Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Arizona · Title 11 — Criminal Law

11-269.09. Federal and state regulations; local coordination; standing; definitions

341 words·~2 min read·/az/title-11/11-269-09·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

A. If a county has laws, regulations, plans or policies that are less restrictive than a federal or state regulation, rule, plan or policy, the county shall demand by any lawful means that the federal or state government coordinate with the county before the federal or state government implements, enforces, expands or extends the federal regulation, rule, plan or policy within the county's jurisdictional boundaries. This subsection is mandatory unless the county specifically votes to not demand coordination.
B. If the federal or state government fails to coordinate in good faith with the county, the county shall hold public hearings, consider the evidence and vote on whether to authorize litigation to enforce the county's coordination rights.
C. If a person who resides or does business in this state serves each member of the board of supervisors with a written demand that the county comply with this section and, within sixty days after service of the written demand, the board of supervisors fails to comply with this section in a manner that causes injury to the person, the person may submit a written demand for a response. The written demand must specify the county law, regulation, plan or policy with which the federal or state government failed to coordinate.
Within thirty days after receiving the written demand for a response, the county shall hold a public hearing to present information on the decision not to demand coordination.
D. For the purposes of this section:
1. "Coordinate" means the action necessary to achieve coordination.
2. "Coordination" means the process by which the federal or state government seeks in good faith to reach consistency between a federal or state regulation, rule, plan or policy and a county law, regulation, plan or policy that is less restrictive than the federal or state regulation, rule, plan or policy.
3. "Less restrictive" means a county law, regulation, plan or policy imposes or would impose less of a burden on the exercise of rights, privileges or immunities enjoyed by individuals, organizations and businesses within the county's jurisdictional boundaries.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.