Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Utah · Title 77 — Utah Code of Criminal Procedure · Chapter 16A

77-16a-102. Jury instructions.

544 words·~2 min read·/ut/title-77/chapter-16a/77-16a-102

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Effective 5/3/2023
77-16a-102. Jury instructions.
(1)If a defendant asserts a defense of not guilty by reason of insanity, the court shall instruct the jury that the jury may find the defendant:
(a)guilty;
(b)guilty with a mental condition at the time of the offense;
(c)guilty of a lesser offense;
(d)guilty of a lesser offense with a mental condition at the time of the offense;
(e)not guilty by reason of insanity; or
(f)not guilty.
(a)When a defendant asserts a mental defense pursuant to Section 76-2-305 or asserts special mitigation reducing the level of an offense pursuant to Subsection 76-5-205.5(2)(a) , or when the evidence raises the issue and either party requests the instruction, the court shall instruct the jury that if the jury finds a defendant guilty by proof beyond a reasonable doubt of a charged offense or lesser included offense, the jury shall also return a special verdict indicating whether the jury finds that the defendant had a mental condition at the time of the offense.
(b)If the jury finds the defendant guilty of the charged offense by proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and by special verdict finds the defendant had a mental condition at the time of the offense, the jury shall return the general verdict of "guilty with a mental condition at the time of the offense."
(c)If the jury finds the defendant guilty of a lesser offense by proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and by special verdict finds the defendant had a mental condition at the time of the offense, the jury shall return the general verdict of "guilty of a lesser offense with a mental condition at the time of the offense."
(d)If the jury finds the defendant guilty of the charged offense or a lesser included offense and does not find that the defendant had a mental condition at the time of the offense, the jury shall return a verdict of "guilty" of the offense, along with the special verdict form indicating that the jury did not find that the defendant had a mental condition at the time of the offense.
(e)The special verdict shall be returned by the jury at the same time as the general verdict, to indicate the basis for the jury's general verdict.
(a)In determining whether a defendant should be found guilty with a mental condition at the time of the offense, the court shall instruct the jury that the standard of proof applicable to a finding of mental condition is by a preponderance of the evidence.
(b)The court shall also instruct the jury that the standard of preponderance of the evidence does not apply to the elements establishing a defendant's guilt, and that the proof of the elements establishing a defendant's guilt of an offense must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
(a)When special mitigation based on extreme emotional distress is at issue pursuant to Subsection 76-5-205.5(2)(b) , the jury shall, in addition to the jury's general verdict, return a special verdict.
(b)The special verdict shall be returned by the jury at the same time as the general verdict, to indicate the basis for the jury's general verdict.
Amended by Chapter 184 , 2023 General Session
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.