46A-13-23. Denial of petition for drainage improvement--Grounds--Liability of petitioners for costs of proceeding.
141 words·~1 min read·
/sd/title-46/chapter-46-13/46a-13-23A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
If the drainage commission has fully heard and considered the petition and the joint plan as adopted or modified, the report of the engineers and viewers, and the determination as to the proportion of cost to be borne by this state, and if the commission finds the proposed drainage improvement not conducive to the public health, convenience, or welfare, or not needed or practicable for the purpose of draining agricultural lands, or that the proportion of the cost of the proposed improvement to be borne by this state will be greater than the benefits conferred, the commission shall deny the petition for the drainage improvement.
The petitioners are jointly and severally liable for the cost and expenses of the proceeding thus far made and incurred by the drainage commission, and the costs and expenses may be recovered in a civil action.