Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2021-11-17 · State Department · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Interim final rule; reopening of public comment period

1,162 words·~5 min read·/register/2021/11/17/2021-25038

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4191-02-P DEPARTMENT OF STATE 22 CFR Part 40 [Public Notice: 11566] RIN 1400-AE87 Visas: Ineligibility Based on Public Charge Grounds AGENCY: State Department. ACTION: Interim final rule; reopening of public comment period. SUMMARY: On October 11, 2019, the Department of State (“the Department”) published an interim final rule (“IFR”) regarding visa ineligibility on public charge grounds and accepted public comments on the rule through November 12, 2019. Given the many changed circumstances since publication of the IFR, the Department is soliciting additional information from the public by reopening the public comment period for an additional 60 days.
DATES: The Department of State will accept comments until January 18, 2022. ADDRESSES: To provide comments go to *https://www.regulations.gov,* enter Docket DOS-2021-0034 and RIN 1400-AE87. Alternatively, you may submit comments by any of the following methods: • *Email:* You may submit comments via email to *VisaRegs@state.gov.* You must include the RIN in the subject line of your message. • *Mail paper submissions:* You may submit comments via physical mail to Regulatory Coordinator, Visa Services, Bureau of Consular Affairs, Department of State, 600 19th St.
NW, Washington, DC 20006. You must include the RIN in the Attention Line in the address. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrea B. Lage, Acting Regulatory Coordinator, Visa Services, Bureau of Consular Affairs, Department of State, 600 19th St. NW, Washington, DC 20006,
(202)485-7586, *VisaRegs@state.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Public Participation All interested parties are invited to respond to this Reopening of Public Comment Period by submitting written views and comments on the IFR regarding visa ineligibility on public charge grounds. Comments must be submitted in English or commenters must submit an English translation. Comments that will provide the most assistance to the Department in considering recommendations will reference a specific existing regulation, order, guidance, policy, or any other similar agency action, explain the reason for any recommended change, and include information that supports the recommended change. II. Background On August 14, 2019, the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) issued a final rule outlining its new interpretation of the public charge ground of inadmissibility. *See Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds,* 84 FR 41292, as amended on October 2, 2019 by *Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds; Correction,* 84 FR 52357 (“DHS Public Charge Final Rule”). The Department issued an IFR on October 11, 2019, amending 22 CFR 40.41 by prescribing how consular officers determine whether a noncitizen is ineligible for a visa under section 212(a)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(4), and 6 U.S.C. 236(b), because they are likely at any time to become a public charge. *See Visas: Ineligibility Based on Public Charge Grounds,* 84 FR 54996. The Department issued its IFR in significant part to ensure that consular officers were applying standards consistent with the DHS Public Charge Final Rule. Specifically, the IFR could have helped avoid situations where a consular officer evaluates a visa applicant's circumstances and concludes that the applicant is not likely at any time to become a public charge, only for DHS to find the applicant inadmissible on public charge grounds under the same facts when they seek admission to the United States. See, *e.g.,* 84 FR at 55011 (“Coordination of Department and DHS implementation of the public charge inadmissibility ground is critical to the Department's interest in preventing inconsistent adjudication standards and different outcomes between determinations of visa eligibility and determinations of admissibility at a port of entry.”). 1 1 The IFR is currently under a preliminary injunction issued by the Southern District of New York on July 29, 2020. *See Make the Road New York* v. *Pompeo,* 475 F. Supp. 3d 232 (S.D.N.Y. 2020). In the time since the Department first issued the IFR, a court order vacating the DHS Public Charge Final Rule nationwide went into effect after the government moved to voluntarily dismiss an appeal of that order. 2 Due to the vacatur of the DHS Public Charge Final Rule, DHS immediately stopped applying its Public Charge Final Rule to all pending applications and petitions that would have been subject to that rule. 3 DHS is now implementing the public charge inadmissibility statute using the former-Immigration and Nationalization Service's 1999 Interim Field Guidance on Deportability and Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds (64 FR 28689, May 26, 1999) issued by the former Immigration and Naturalization Service, which was in place before the 2019 DHS Public Charge Final Rule was implemented, for immigration petitions, applications for admission and adjustment of status. On August 23, 2021, DHS published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“ANPRM”) and notice of virtual public listening sessions to seek broad public feedback on the public charge ground of inadmissibility that will inform its development of a future regulatory proposal. 4 2 *Cook County* v. *Wolf,* 498 F. Supp. 3d 999 (N.D. Ill. 2020), appeal dismissed, 2021 WL 1608766 (7th Cir. Mar. 9, 2021). 3 *See* USCIS, “Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds Final Rule: Litigation” *https://www.uscis.gov/green-card/green-card-processes-and-procedures/public-charge/inadmissibility-on-public-charge-grounds-final-rule-litigation* (last visited Aug. 24, 2021). 4 *Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility,* 86 FR 47025 (Aug. 23, 2021). III. Change in Circumstances With the vacatur of the 2019 DHS Public Charge Final Rule the original reason for the Department's adoption of the 2019 IFR may no longer apply. Further, with the publication of the DHS ANPRM, DHS has indicated an intention to develop a new regulatory proposal that may substantively differ from the IFR. Additionally, just months after the Department issued its IFR, the COVID-19 pandemic swept the globe. The pandemic's ongoing effects on public health and economic conditions have been vast and have underscored the importance of ensuring that individuals are able to access public health and other programs for which they and their family members are eligible, without undue fear or confusion. The Department welcomes comments on the potential effects of the IFR on public health measures in response to the pandemic, as well as other ways that the Department should consider the intervening circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic in relation to the IFR. Consequently, the Department has concluded that it should review the IFR to determine
(1)if the IFR should be rescinded or revised, and
(2)what final rule should be adopted, if any. If the IFR is rescinded, § 40.41 would logically revert to its prior text pending any new rulemaking; such an outcome would likely be preferable to a regulatory void, which the Department did not propose in the 2019 IFR. See 22 CFR 40.41 (2018). 5 5 Prior text of § 40.41 available at *https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2018-title22-vol1/pdf/CFR-2018-title22-vol1-chapI-subchapE.pdf,* page 8. IV. Request for Public Comment The Department invites comment on any issues that may be pertinent to its review of the IFR to determine
(1)if the IFR should be rescinded or revised, and
(2)what final rule should be adopted, if any. Reopening the comment period gives interested persons an opportunity to comment on these issues. Kevin E. Bryant, Deputy Director, Office of Directives Management, U.S. Department of State. [FR Doc. 2021-25038 Filed 11-16-21; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 3
3 references not yet in our index
  • 22 CFR 40
  • 475 F. Supp. 3d 232
  • 498 F. Supp. 3d 999
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Interim final rule; reopening of public comment period
F. Supp.475 F. Supp. 3d 232
F. Supp.498 F. Supp. 3d 999
Cite22 CFR 40
Cites 6Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.