Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2020-06-22 · Indian Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Notice of proposed rulemaking

1,039 words·~5 min read·/register/2020/06/22/2020-12754

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Indian Health Service 42 CFR Part 136a [Docket No. IHS-FRDOC-0001] RIN 0917-AA13 Indian Health; Removal of Suspended Regulations AGENCY: Indian Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. SUMMARY: The Indian Health Service
(IHS)of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS or “the Department”) is issuing this notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM)proposing the removal of regulations appearing in the Code of Federal Regulations. These regulations have never been implemented and were referred to as “suspended” in a 1999 **Federal Register** Notice. DATES: Send comments on or before August 21, 2020. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments to this proposed rule, identified by RIN 0917-AA14 by any of the following methods: • *Federal eRulemaking Portal.* You may submit electronic comments at *http://www.regulations.gov* by searching for the Docket ID number IHS-FRDOC-0001. Follow the instructions *http://www.regulations.gov* online for submitting comments through this method. • *Regular, Express, or Overnight Mail:* You may mail comments to Indian Health Service, Attention: Evonne Bennett, Acting Director, NPRM, RIN 0917-AA13, Division of Regulatory and Policy Coordination, Office of Management Services, Indian Health Service, 5600 Fishers Lane, Mailstop: 09E70, Rockville, Maryland 20857. All comments received by the methods and due date specified above will be posted without change to content to *http://www.regulations.gov,* including any personal information provided about the commenter, and such posting may occur before or after the closing of the comment period. *Docket:* For complete access to background documents or posted comments, go to *http://www.regulations.gov* and search for Docket ID number IHS-FRDOC-0001. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Evonne Bennett, Acting Director, Division of Regulatory and Policy Coordination, Office of Management Services, IHS, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, Mail Stop: 09E70. Telephone
(301)443-1116 (This is not a toll-free number). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In response to Executive Order 13777, Sec. 3(d), which directs agencies to repeal existing regulations that are “outdated, unnecessary or ineffective” from the CFR, HHS proposes to remove the regulations appearing at 42 CFR part 136a. These regulations were promulgated as a final rule in 1987 and were intended to replace the regulations appearing in the CFR at 42 CFR part 136. The new regulations, however, were never implemented and have since been referred to as “suspended” in the **Federal Register** *.* In the intervening years, the IHS has continued to follow the regulations appearing at 42 CFR part 136, and the IHS does not propose to alter this practice. Instead, the IHS proposes to remove the duplicative regulations at 42 CFR part 136a from the CFR. Given how much time has passed since these regulations were initially promulgated; the concern on the part of Congress regarding implementation of the regulations; and the confusion caused by having two sets of regulations addressing the same issue published in the CFR, the Agency proposes that the suspended regulations at 42 CFR part 136a be deleted in their entirety. Executive Orders 12866, 13563, 13771, and 13777 Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives. Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 defines a “significant regulatory action” as an action that is likely to result in a rule:
(1)Having an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more in any 1 year, or adversely and materially affecting a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local or Tribal governments or communities (also referred to as “economically significant”);
(2)creating a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfering with an action taken or planned by another agency;
(3)materially altering the budgetary impacts of entitlement grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or
(4)raising novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in the Executive Order. A regulatory impact analysis
(RIA)must be prepared for major rules with economically significant effects ($100 million or more in any 1 year). HHS submits that this proposed rule is not “economically significant” as measured by the $100 million threshold, and hence not a major rule under the Congressional Review Act. This rule has not been designated as a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Executive Order 13771, titled, “Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs,” was issued on January 30, 2017. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to categorize all impacts which generate or alleviate costs associated with regulatory burden and to determine the actions' net incremental effect. HHS identifies this proposed rule as a deregulatory action (removing an obsolete rule from the Code of Federal Regulations) that provides no cost savings. Executive Order 13777, titled, “Enforcing the Regulatory Reform Agenda,” was issued on February 24, 2017. As required by Section 3 of this Executive Order, HHS established a Regulatory Reform Task Force (HHS Task Force). Pursuant to Section 3(d)(ii), the HHS Task Force evaluated this rulemaking and determined that these regulations are “outdated, unnecessary, or ineffective.” Following this finding, the HHS Task Force advised IHS to initiate this rulemaking to remove the unnecessary regulation from the Code of Federal Regulations. Regulatory Flexibility Act This action will not have a significant economic impact on Indian health programs. Therefore, the regulatory flexibility analysis provided for under the Regulatory Flexibility Act is not required. Paperwork Reduction Act This action does not affect any information collections. List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 136a Government procurement, Government programs—education, Grant programs—education, Grant programs—health, Grant programs—Indians, Health care, Health professions, Indians, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Scholarships and fellowships, Student aid. PART 136a—[REMOVED] For the reasons set forth above, and under the authority of the Snyder Act (25 U.S.C. 13) and the Transfer Act (42 U.S.C. 2001 *et seq.* ), the Department of Health and Human Services proposes to remove 42 CFR part 136a from the Code of Federal Regulations. Dated: March 13, 2020. Michael D. Weahkee, RADM, Assistant Surgeon General, U.S. Public Health Service, Principal Deputy Director, Indian Health Service. Approved: April 9, 2020. Alex M. Azar II, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services. [FR Doc. 2020-12754 Filed 6-19-20; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 4
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 42 CFR 136
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Notice of proposed rulemaking
Cite42 CFR 136
Cites 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.