Unknown. Final interpretive rule

5,121 words·~23 min read·/register/2020/01/16/2020-00659

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

--- schema: federal-register doc_type: fedreg source_file: FR-2020-01-16.xml --- 85 11 Thursday, January 16, 2020 Contents Agricultural Marketing Agricultural Marketing Service NOTICES Privacy Act; Systems of Records, 2693-2696 2020-00658 Agriculture Agriculture Department See Agricultural Marketing Service See Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service See Commodity Credit Corporation See Forest Service See Rural Business-Cooperative Service See The U.S. Codex Office Animal Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service RULES User Fees for Agricultural Quarantine and Inspection Services, 2621-2624 2020-00659 Children Children and Families Administration NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities;

Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Building Capacity to Evaluate Child Welfare Community Collaborations to Strengthen and Preserve Families Cross-Site Process Evaluation, 2745-2746 2020-00594 Tribal Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program Form 2: Grantee Performance Measures, 2744-2745 2020-00593 Coast Guard Coast Guard RULES Safety Zone: Morro Bay Harbor Entrance, Morro Bay, CA, 2643-2646 2020-00375 Commerce Commerce Department See Industry and Security Bureau See International Trade Administration See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Commodity Credit Commodity Credit Corporation NOTICES Request for Information:

Higher Blends Infrastructure Incentive Program, 2699-2700 2020-00617 Consumer Product Consumer Product Safety Commission NOTICES Meetings; Sunshine Act, 2722-2723 2020-00710 Corporation Corporation for National and Community Service NOTICES Privacy Act; Systems of Records, 2723-2726 2020-00581 Defense Department Defense Department NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 2726, 2728 2020-00608 2020-00560 Privacy Act; Systems of Records, 2726-2730 2020-00567 2020-00571 2020-00582 2020-00587 Education Department Education Department NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities;

Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery, 2730-2731 2020-00632 Energy Department Energy Department See Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Environmental Protection Environmental Protection Agency RULES Air Quality State Implementation Plans; Approvals and Promulgations: Georgia; Nonattainment New Source Review, 2646-2648 2020-00326 New Mexico; City of Albuquerque-Bernalillo County; New Source Review Preconstruction Permitting Program, 2648-2654 2020-00286 Pesticide Tolerances:

Fenhexamid, 2654-2659 2020-00080 PROPOSED RULES Significant New Use Rules on Certain Chemical Substances (20-1.B), 2676-2683 2019-26292 Federal Aviation Federal Aviation Administration RULES Airworthiness Directives: Airbus SAS Airplanes, 2627-2629 2020-00609 The Boeing Company Airplanes, 2624-2627 2020-00580 Instrument Flight Rules Altitudes; Miscellaneous Amendments, 2629-2639 2020-00322 Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle Departure Procedures;

Miscellaneous Amendments, 2640-2643 2020-00328 2020-00329 NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Representatives of the Administrator, 2806-2807 2020-00597 Petition for Exemption; Summary: Greenpoint Technologies, Inc., 2807 2020-00561 James Ivey, 2807-2808 2020-00660 Federal Communications Federal Communications Commission RULES Wireless E911 Location Accuracy Requirements, 2660-2675 2019-28483 PROPOSED RULES Wireless E911 Location Accuracy Requirements, 2683-2692 2019-28482 Federal Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission NOTICES Application:

City of St. Cloud, MN, 2734-2735 2020-00623 City of Tacoma, WA, 2732 2020-00621 Public Utility District No. 1 of Chelan; County, WA, 2734 2020-00627 Combined Filings, 2733 2020-00619 Filing: Questar Southern Trails Pipeline Co., 2733-2734 2020-00624 Schedule for Environmental Review: Portland Natural Gas Transmission System; Westbrook XPress Project, 2731-2732 2020-00626 Transfer of Exemption: Ampersand Collins Hydro, LLC; Dichotomy Collins Hydro, LLC, 2732-2733 2020-00628 Update on Market-Based Rate Database:

Data Collection for Analytics and Surveillance and Market-Based Rate Purposes, 2736 2020-00622 Federal Housing Finance Agency Federal Housing Finance Agency NOTICES Property Assessed Clean Energy Program, 2736-2740 2020-00655 Federal Reserve Federal Reserve System NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 2740-2744 2020-00566 2020-00614 2020-00634 Fish Fish and Wildlife Service NOTICES Receipt of Incidental Take Permit Application and Proposed Habitat Conservation Plan for Sand Skink;

Polk County, FL; Categorical Exclusion, 2757 2020-00630 Receipt of Proposed Habitat Conservation Plan for Sand Skink and Blue-tailed Mole-Skink and Application to Amend Incidental Take Permit; Osceola County, FL; Categorical Exclusion, 2756 2020-00631 Food and Drug Food and Drug Administration NOTICES Guidance: Pediatric Study Plans for Oncology Drugs: Questions and Answers, 2746-2747 2020-00592 Foreign Assets Foreign Assets Control Office NOTICES Blocking or Unblocking of Persons and Properties, 2814-2817 2020-00596 2020-00613 Forest Forest Service RULES Public Notice and Comment for Forest Service Directives, 2864 2020-00666 NOTICES Forest Service Handbook 1109.12;

Directive System Handbook; Providing Notice and Opportunity to Comment on Forest Service Directives, 2865 2020-00668 Meetings: Flathead Resource Advisory Committee, 2697-2698 2020-00649 Lincoln Resource Advisory Committee, 2699 2020-00650 Mineral County Resource Advisory Committee, 2698-2699 2020-00618 The Nevada and Placer Counties Resource Advisory Committee, 2698 2020-00620 Health and Human Health and Human Services Department See Children and Families Administration See Food and Drug Administration See National Institutes of Health See Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Homeland Homeland Security Department See Coast Guard See U.S.

Citizenship and Immigration Services Industry Industry and Security Bureau NOTICES Meetings: Information Systems Technical Advisory Committee, 2700-2701 2020-00552 Interior Interior Department See Fish and Wildlife Service See Land Management Bureau Internal Revenue Internal Revenue Service PROPOSED RULES Classification of Cloud Transactions and Transactions Involving Digital Content: Hearing, 2676 2020-00591 International Trade Adm International Trade Administration NOTICES Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Investigations, Orders, or Reviews:

Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to-Length Plate from the Republic of Korea, 2710-2712 2020-00644 Certain Pasta from Italy, 2714-2715 2020-00640 Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the People's Republic of China, 2701-2702 2020-00638 Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea, 2719-2721 2020-00642 Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China, 2705-2708 2020-00639 Monosodium Glutamate from the Republic of Indonesia, 2717-2719 2020-00645 Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube from the People's Republic of China, 2708-2709 2020-00647 Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico, 2702-2705 2020-00646 Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, from the People's Republic of China, 2709-2710 2020-00643 Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipes and Tubes from India, 2715-2717 2020-00641 Scope Rulings, 2712-2714 2020-00637 Justice Department Justice Department NOTICES Proposed Consent Decree:

Clean Air Act, Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act, 2759-2760 2020-00558 Labor Department Labor Department See Wage and Hour Division Land Land Management Bureau NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Oil and Gas Facility Site Security, 2757-2758 2020-00612 Record of Decision: Desert Quartzite Solar Photovoltaic Project, Riverside County, CA, 2758-2759 2020-00611 Maritime Maritime Administration NOTICES Deepwater Port License Application:

Texas COLT LLC; Correction, 2808 2020-00615 NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Datanaut Applicant Selection, 2761 2020-00553 National Institute National Institutes of Health NOTICES Meetings: Center for Scientific Review, 2752 2020-00578 National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 2752-2753 2020-00575 2020-00576 National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, 2753 2020-00579 National Institute on Aging, 2747 2020-00577 Privacy Act;

Systems of Records, 2747-2752 2020-00633 National Oceanic National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 2721-2722 2020-00601 2020-00602 2020-00603 National Science National Science Foundation NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 2761-2762 2020-00654 Pipeline Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities;

Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Hazardous Materials, 2809-2812 2020-00651 Hazardous Materials: Actions on Special Permits, 2812-2813 2020-00606 Applications for Modifications to Special Permits, 2808-2809 2020-00605 Applications for New Special Permits, 2813-2814 2020-00604 Rural Business Rural Business-Cooperative Service NOTICES Request for Information: Higher Blends Infrastructure Incentive Program, 2699-2700 2020-00617 Securities Securities and Exchange Commission NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities;

Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 2762-2763 2020-00559 Order: Temporary Exemptions from the Exchange Act and Exchange Act Rules in Connection with the Revision of the Definition of Security to Encompass Security-Based Swaps, 2763-2766 2020-00568 Self-Regulatory Organizations; Proposed Rule Changes: BOX Exchange LLC, 2783-2784 2020-00588 MIAX Emerald, LLC, 2766-2783 2020-00586 MIAX PEARL, LLC, 2784-2801 2020-00589 Small Business Small Business Administration NOTICES Class Waiver of the Nonmanufacturer Rule, 2801-2802 2020-00454 State Department State Department NOTICES Meetings:

Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation, 2803 2020-00629 Rescission of Statutory Debarment under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations: Jami Siraj Choudhury, David Michael Janowski II, Netria Corporation, Jonathan Robert Reynolds, and State Metal Industries, Inc., 2802-2803 2020-00656 Substance Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration NOTICES Meetings: Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council, 2753-2754 2020-00584 Surface Transportation Surface Transportation Board NOTICES Control:

Soo Line Corp.; Central Maine and Quebec Railway, Inc., 2803-2806 2020-00625 Codex The U.S. Codex Office NOTICES Meetings: Codex Committee on General Principles, 2696-2697 2020-00590 Transportation Department Transportation Department See Federal Aviation Administration See Maritime Administration See Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Treasury Treasury Department See Foreign Assets Control Office See Internal Revenue Service U.S. Citizenship U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities;

Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Application for Employment Authorization, 2755-2756 2020-00563 Request for Premium Processing Service, 2754 2020-00564 Veteran Affairs Veterans Affairs Department NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Statement of Purchaser or Owner Assuming Seller's Loan, 2817 2020-00585 Wage Wage and Hour Division RULES Joint Employer Status under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 2820-2862 2019-28343 NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities;

Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Disclosures to Workers under the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act, 2760-2761 2020-00562 Separate Parts In This Issue Part II Labor Department, Wage and Hour Division, 2820-2862 2019-28343 Part III Agriculture Department, Forest Service, 2864-2865 2020-00666 2020-00668 Reader Aids Consult the Reader Aids section at the end of this issue for phone numbers, online resources, finding aids, and notice of recently enacted public laws.

To subscribe to the Federal Register Table of Contents electronic mailing list, go to https://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/USGPOOFR/subscriber/new, enter your e-mail address, then follow the instructions to join, leave, or manage your subscription. 85 11 Thursday, January 16, 2020 Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 7 CFR Part 354 [Docket No. APHIS-2013-0021] RIN 0579-AD77 User Fees for Agricultural Quarantine and Inspection Services AGENCY:

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA. ACTION: Final interpretive rule. SUMMARY: On May 13, 2016, the Air Transport Association of America, Inc., and the International Air Transport Association filed suit against the United States Department of Agriculture, the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), the Department of Homeland Security, Customs and Border Protection Agency (CBP), the Secretary of Agriculture, the Administrator of APHIS, the Commissioner of CBP, and the Secretary of Homeland Security, claiming APHIS' 2015 final rule setting fee structures for its Agricultural Quarantine and Inspection

(AQI)program (Docket No. APHIS-2013-0021, effective December 28, 2015) (2015 Final Rule) violated the Food, Agriculture, Conservation and Trade Act of 1990 (FACT Act) and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). In its March 28, 2018, Order, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia affirmed APHIS' cost methodology and the sufficiency of its data. *Air Transport Ass'n of Am., Inc.* v. *U.S. Dep't of Agric.,* 303 F. Supp. 3d 28 (D.D.C. 2018). However, the Court held that in the rulemaking for the 2015 Final Rule, the ground upon which APHIS relied to justify setting fees at a level that enabled APHIS to maintain a reasonable balance in the AQI user fee account was an expired provision in the FACT Act. The Court remanded to APHIS the reserve portion of the 2015 Final Rule updating user fees for the AQI program. Accordingly, on April 26, 2019, APHIS published in the **Federal Register** a interpretative rule and request for comments, titled “User Fees for Agricultural Quarantine and Inspection Services” (Docket No. APHIS-2013-0021) (the Interpretive Rule). The Interpretive Rule clarified the agency's statutory authority to collect a reserve fund in support of AQI inspection activities, including by citing unexpired provisions of the FACT Act as the basis for collecting and maintaining a reserve. The Interpretive Rule requested public comment related to the legal authority for the reserve component of the AQI User Fee Program. This document responds to comments received on the Interpretive Rule and finalizes that rule. DATES: This final interpretive rule is effective February 18, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. George Balady, Senior Regulatory Policy Specialist, Office of the Executive Director-Policy Management, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road, Unit 131, Riverdale, MD 20737 1231;

(301)851-2338; email: *AQI.User.Fees@usda.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On May 13, 2016, the Air Transport Association of America, Inc., and the International Air Transport Association filed suit against the United States Department of Agriculture, the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), the Department of Homeland Security, the Customs and Border Protection Agency (CBP), the Secretary of Agriculture, the Administrator of APHIS, the Commissioner of CBP, and the Secretary of Homeland Security, claiming APHIS' 2015 Final Rule setting fee structures for its Agricultural Quarantine and Inspection

(AQI)program (80 FR 66748, Docket No. APHIS-2013-0021, effective December 28, 2015, referred to below as “the Final Rule” or “the 2015 Final Rule”) violated the Food, Agriculture, Conservation and Trade Act of 1990 (FACT Act), 21 U.S.C. 136a, and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 500 *et seq.* In its March 28, 2018 Order, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia affirmed APHIS' cost methodology and the sufficiency of its data. *Air Transport Ass'n of Am., Inc.* v. *U.S. Dep't of Agric.,* 303 F. Supp. 3d 28 (D.D.C. 2018). The Court rejected the plaintiffs' claims that the Final Rule's imposition of the commercial aircraft fee is duplicative of the air passenger fee; that the Final Rule results in cross-subsidization; and that the Final Rule relied on unreliable data that was not disclosed to the public. However, the Court held that APHIS improperly relied on an expired provision in the FACT Act to justify setting fees at a level that enabled APHIS to maintain a reasonable balance in the AQI user fee account. The Court remanded to APHIS the reserve portion of the 2015 Final Rule updating user fees for the AQI program. The Court expressly did not vacate the rule pending further explanation by the agency. *See Air Transport Ass'n of Am., Inc.* v. *U.S. Dep't of Agric.,* 317 F. Supp. 3d 385, 392 (D.D.C. 2018). In its memorandum opinion on summary judgment, the Court stated that the agency unreasonably relied on the “reasonable balance” allowance in 21 U.S.C. 136a(a)(1)(C) of the FACT Act to justify its continued fee collection to maintain a reserve, as that allowance expired after fiscal year 2002. The Court did not rule on whether APHIS had authority for continued fee collection to maintain a reserve under any other subsection of the FACT Act and, therefore, remanded to the Agency for “reconsideration of its authority to charge a surcharge for the reserve account.” *See Air Transport Ass'n,* 303 F. Supp. 3d at 57. The Court expressly declined to consider APHIS' explanation in its legal filings that, consistent with its past explanations and practice, APHIS justified its authority to collect such fees under other subsections of 21 U.S.C. 136a(a)(1). *Air Transport Ass'n,* 303 F. Supp. 3d at 51; *see, e.g.,* User Fees for Agricultural Quarantine & Inspection Services, 71 FR 49984 (August 24, 2006). The Court did “not evaluate or rule on the agency's . . . argument that it had authority to fund a reserve under” a different part of the statute, and instead remanded the rule to the agency without vacating for further consideration of the agency's authority. *Air Transport Ass'n,* 303 F. Supp. 3d at 51. The Court ordered APHIS to complete notice and comment rulemaking to address whether “there is support for APHIS authority to set a reserve fee elsewhere in the statute [other than 21 U.S.C. 136a(a)(1)(C)].” *Air Transport Ass'n,* 317 F. Supp. 3d at 392. Accordingly, on April 26, 2019, APHIS issued an interpretive rule and request for comments (Interpretive Rule) 1 (84 FR 17729-17731, Docket No. APHIS-2013-0021) to the 2015 Final Rule. In the document, APHIS clarified that subsections 136a(a)(1)(A) and

(B)of the FACT Act provide adequate authority to continue setting user fees in amounts to maintain the AQI reserve, irrespective of the expiration of subsection 136a(a)(1)(C). 1 To view the Interpretive Rule and the comments that we received, go to *https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=APHIS-2013-0021.* The comments received on the correction can best be accessed by clicking on “view all” next to the Comments field, and then sorting by “date posted” on the resulting screen. APHIS took comments on its Interpretive Rule for 30 days ending May 28, 2019. We received 10 comments by that date. The received comments were from an organization representing the pork industry in the United States, an organization representing the trucking industry in the United States, an organization representing commercial airlines, an organization representing county agricultural commissioners in one State, a maritime exchange, and private citizens. Three commenters supported APHIS' interpretation of the FACT Act without further comment, and two comments were not germane to the AQI User Fee program or the Interpretive Rule. Two commenters generally agreed with APHIS' interpretation of the FACT Act, but also provided comment on how the reserve should be maintained or used in order to fully comply with the intent of the FACT Act. Three commenters disagreed with APHIS' interpretation of the FACT Act and provided reasons why they considered a reserve to be in violation of the Act. The issues raised by the commenters are discussed below, by topic. Comments Expressing Concern Regarding Transparency Two commenters, one of whom supported APHIS' interpretation of the FACT Act and one of whom disagreed with it, stated that a reserve maintained to administer the User Fee program could theoretically be used for any program purpose. The commenters expressed concern that this would not allow the general public to know how large an amount was maintained in the reserve, how it was derived, and for what purposes it was being used. One of the commenters stated that, if APHIS wished to use subsections 136a(a)(1)(A) and

(B)of the FACT Act as a basis for maintaining a reserve to administer the AQI User Fee program, it should make the user fee sources from which the reserve had been derived publicly available, indicating the percentage of the reserve drawn from each user fee group, and should make the total amount of the reserve publicly available as well. The reserve is not drawn from specific user fee sources by percentage. Rather, AQI user fee rates are calculated so that a percentage allocated for the reserve (currently 3.5 percent) is built into each fee collected (see the 2015 Final Rule at 80 FR 66753). While we do not believe the statute requires us to make the amount in the reserve publicly available, we have decided to post the amount in the reserve on APHIS' AQI user fees web page and update it on an annual basis. The page will indicate that the amount listed represents the amount in the reserve at a particular moment in time, and will further indicate that it does not include accounts due to APHIS or accounts payable from the reserve. We plan to announce the amount in the reserve, as well as the schedule for future announcements, through a notice published in the **Federal Register** in calendar year 2020. With respect to the purposes of the reserve, this notice will also provide examples of one-time expenditures from the reserve that were made in previous fiscal years; other expenditures cannot easily be itemized in the manner requested by the commenter. Comments Regarding Cross-Subsidization One commenter stated that, if the reserve is drawn from all user fee groups but is used on an activity that only benefits a particular user fee group, this amounts to cross-subsidization of that activity. Subsection 136a(a)(2) of the FACT Act requires that APHIS ensure that, when setting fees, the amount of an AQI user fee is commensurate with the costs of agricultural quarantine and inspection services with respect to the class of persons or entities paying the fee. APHIS considers this subsection to prohibit us from setting fees for one AQI program in a manner that would knowingly cross-subsidize another AQI program. In contrast, the commenter's interpretation would preclude us from using fees for activities necessary for the overall administration of the program, which would run counter to the intent of subsection 136a(a)(1)(B) of the FACT Act. The same commenter stated that, if the reserve were used to cover revenue shortfall due to delinquent accounts, this would also constitute cross-subsidization, since the delinquent party would effectively receive services paid for by another party. The commenter also expressed concern that using the reserve in this manner could encourage delinquent parties to remain in arrears. We do not consider this practice to constitute cross-subsidization, as it does not implicate how APHIS sets its user fees. Once again, the FACT Act only requires that, “ *in setting the fees* . . . the Secretary shall ensure that the amount of fees is commensurate with the costs of agricultural quarantine and inspection services with respect to the class of persons or entities paying the fees.” 21 U.S.C. 136a(a)(2) (emphasis added). Furthermore, we do not believe use of the reserve fund poses a significant risk of encouraging delinquent parties to remain in arrears. We note that there are several procedures in place within the AQI User Fees program to discourage delinquency; delinquent accounts are sent multiple billing notices, sent a letter of warning, and ultimately referred to the Department of the Treasury for collection. Comments Regarding Congressional Intent Two commenters disagreed with APHIS' interpretation that subsections 136a(a)(1)(A) and

(B)of the FACT Act provide authority to set user fees in amounts to maintain an AQI reserve. The commenters opined that this would effectively render subsection 136a(a)(1)(C), which explicitly authorized maintaining the reserve through fiscal year

(FY)2002, superfluous and thus ineffectual. Both of the commenters suggested that the FACT Act establishes three distinct bases for collecting AQI User Fees:

(1)To recover costs of providing AQI services in connection with the arrival at a port in the customs territory of the United States;

(2)to recover costs of administering the program; and

(3)through FY 2002, to maintain a reasonable balance in the AQI User Fee Account. The commenters stated that APHIS' interpretation of the FACT Act thus contravenes Congressional intent. We disagree that our interpretation of subsections 136a(a)(1)(A) and

(B)as allowing collection and maintenance of a reserve following the end of FY 2002 renders subsection 136a(a)(1)(C), which authorized the maintenance of a reasonable balance in the AQI User Fee Account through the end of FY 2002, superfluous. Congress enacted the 1996 amendments in order to respond to escalating budget pressures and increasing demand for AQI services due to consistent annual increases in passenger and commercial air travel by changing AQI's funding structure to transition from being funded from an account subject to annual appropriations to a true “user fee account.” Revoking APHIS' ability to maintain a reasonable balance in the reserve at the same time that Congress was transitioning the AQI User Fee Account to one for which fees could only be adjusted through notice-and-comment rulemaking is inconsistent with the purpose of ensuring that the funding structure responded to the needs of the program. The same commenters stated that a plain reading of the FACT Act limits APHIS' authority to maintain a reserve to the time period between the passage of the amended act in 1996 and the end of FY 2002. We disagree. A plain reading of the FACT Act gives specific authority to maintain a reasonable balance until the end of FY 2002, but does not address whether a reserve could continue to be maintained after FY 2002 to recover costs associated with providing AQI services or administering AQI programs. As we discussed in the Interpretive Rule, we consider the FACT Act to grant such authority. One commenter stated that APHIS' interpretation of the FACT Act as stated in the Interpretive Rule violated the precedent established in *Corley versus United States* (556 U.S. 303), *Marx versus General Revenue Corporation* (568 U.S. 371), *Michigan versus the Environmental Protection Agency* (135 S. Ct. 2699), *Chevron versus Natural Resources Defense Council* (467 U.S. 837), and *Laurel Baye Health Care of Lake Lanier, Inc., versus National Labor Relations Board* (564 F.3d 469 (D.C. Cir. 2009)). We consider the APHIS' interpretation of the FACT Act to be consistent with relevant legal precedent and authorities. The agency's legal position has been expressed in full in briefs in the *Air Transport Ass'n of Am., Inc.* v. *U.S. Dep't of Agric.* litigation and APHIS continues to hold the views expressed therein. Specifically, APHIS' view is that its interpretation of the FACT Act gives effect to each of the Act's provisions. Comment Regarding Commensurability of Fees One commenter pointed out that section 136a(a)(2) of the FACT Act stipulates that in setting AQI User Fees, APHIS must ensure that the amount of each fee be commensurate with the costs of providing AQI services to the class of users paying the fees. The commenter opined that this section precludes fees from being set at a level that exceeds actual costs of providing services. APHIS disagrees with the commenter's interpretation of section 136a(a)(2) of the FACT Act, which would, *inter alia,* render ineffective subsection 136a(a)(1)(B)'s authorization to collect fees at a level necessary for the administration of the program. Administrative costs often impact the AQI program as a whole; therefore, it is not possible to divide these costs based on individual user fee groups. For example, the development of policies regarding inspection procedures and sampling of agricultural commodities at ports of entry, the maintenance of manuals regarding the entry requirements for agricultural products, and the issuance of permits for agricultural commodities intended for import into the United States are not rendered to a particular user group but to the program as a whole. Comment Regarding Calculation Process One commenter stated that the 2015 Final Rule that set the user fee schedule for the AQI program was based on a Grant Thornton, LLC guidance document, and the Grant Thornton document appeared to calculate the fee model on the presupposition that subsection 136a(a)(1)(C) of the FACT Act was still operative. The commenter also stated that nowhere had the Grant Thornton document made it explicit that the reserve fee calculation was based on actual or imputed costs of providing AQI services or administering the AQI program. The same commenter also stated that the 2015 rule itself indicated that the reserve fee had been calculated based on the assumption that subsection 136a(a)(1)(C) of the FACT Act was still operative. The commenter believed that 136a(a)(1)(A) and

(B)provide a more limited basis for collecting and maintaining a reserve. The 2015 Final Rule took the recommendations of Grant Thornton into consideration, but the final calculation of the reserve fee was ultimately determined by APHIS. The calculation of the reserve fee was not based on the assumption that subsection 136a(a)(1)(C) of the FACT Act was still operative; the specific methodology used for calculation of the fee is set forth at length in the 2015 Final Rule (see 80 FR 66752-66753) and makes no reference to subsection 136a(a)(1)(C) of the FACT Act. Finally, we disagree with the commenter's assertion that subsections 136a(a)(1)(A) and

(B)provide a more limited basis for collecting and maintaining a reserve than subsection 136a(a)(1)(C). APHIS' final calculation for the reserve is supported by subsections 136a(a)(1)(A) and

(B)of the FACT Act and enables full cost recovery under the FACT Act for all the reasons stated above. Comment Disagreeing With APHIS' Interpretation of Previous Rulemakings In the Interpretive Rule, we stated that our interpretation of the FACT Act was consistent with long-standing practice, which had been explained to the public through multiple rulemaking proceedings, beginning in 2002. *See* 67 FR 56217, Docket No. 02-085-1; 69 FR 71660, Docket No. 04-042-1; 71 FR 49985, Docket No. 04-042-2. A commenter stated that each rule cited by APHIS as evidence of the long-standing nature of the APHIS' interpretation of the FACT Act instead provided evidence that reserve fees have consistently been calculated based on the assumption that subsection 136a(a)(1)(C) was still operative. The commenter stated that APHIS had therefore deliberately mischaracterized prior rulemakings in the correction. We disagree. Since 2004, we have consistently stressed the need to maintain a reserve in order to administer the AQI User Fee program and ensure continuity of services, thus effectively claiming subsections 136a(a)(1)(A) and

(B)as the bases for the reserve. For example, in a 2004 rulemaking, the first rulemaking APHIS initiated after FY 2002, APHIS “included a reserve-building component in the user fees.” *See* 69 FR 71660, 71664. In that rulemaking, APHIS stated that “the FACT Act, as amended” directed that “user fees should cover the costs of” only three things: [(1)] Providing the AQI services for the conveyances and the passengers listed . . . , [(2)] Providing preclearance or preinspection [services], and [(3)] Administering the user fee program.” 69 FR 71660; *see also id.* (not mentioning FACT Act's “reasonable balance” language). Nonetheless, in that same rulemaking, APHIS set fees that “includ[ed] a reserve-building component.” *Id.* at 71664. APHIS stated that it was doing so because “[m]aintaining an adequate reserve fund is . . . essential for the AQI program,” and explained why it “need[s] to maintain a reasonable reserve balance in the AQI account.” *Id.* (“The reserve fund provides us with a means to ensure the continuity of AQI services in cases of fluctuations in activity volumes, bad debt, carrier insolvency, or other unforeseen events.”) This explanation in that 2004 rulemaking makes clear that, of the three items the cost of which user fees should cover, APHIS was justifying its inclusion “of a reserve-building component” directly on the third—“[a]dministering the user fee program.” As noted previously in the Interpretive Rule and in this document, this rationale effectively relies on subsection 136a(a)(1)(B) of the FACT Act as a basis for the reserve. The 2004 rulemaking also aligned administering the program with ensuring continuity of AQI services by indicating that one of the ways in which APHIS administers the program is by maintaining sufficient funds in reserve to ensure continuity of AQI services within the program. As noted previously in the Interpretive Rule and in this document, this rationale effectively relies on subsection 136a(a)(1)(A) of the FACT Act as another basis for the reserve. In the 2006 final rule that responded to comments on the 2004 rulemaking, we again aligned administering the program with maintaining sufficient funds in reserve to ensure continuity of AQI services. *See* 71 FR 49985. APHIS' 2014 proposed rule to revise the AQI user fee schedule again aligned administration of the user fee program with maintaining sufficient funds to provide AQI services. *See* 79 FR 22896. Comment Requesting Assistance for Domestic Programs One commenter asked that APHIS fund domestic control and eradication programs undertaken by State cooperators using AQI user fees. The FACT Act prohibits such subsidization. Congressional Review Act Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 *et seq.* ), the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs designated this action as not a major rule, as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701-7772, 7781-7786, and 8301-8317; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 49 U.S.C. 80503; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3. Done in Washington, DC, this 13th day of January 2020. Kevin Shea, Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. [FR Doc. 2020-00659 Filed 1-15-20; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 6

Traces to 6 documents

U.S. Code