Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2015-12-24 · Commodity Credit Corporation and Farm Service Agency, USDA · Notices

Notices. Notice

1,744 words·~8 min read·/register/2015/12/24/2015-32456

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P 80 247 Thursday, December 24, 2015 Notices DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Commodity Credit Corporation Domestic Sugar Program: Overall Allotment Quantity and Marketing Allotments AGENCY: Commodity Credit Corporation and Farm Service Agency, USDA. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Farm Service Agency
(FSA)on behalf of the Commodity Credit Corporation
(CCC)is issuing this notice to publish the sugar Overall Allotment Quantity (OAQ), beet and cane sugar marketing allotments, and processor allocations for fiscal year
(FY)2016 (October 1, 2015-September 30, 2016), as well as a summary of the OAQ's, sugar marketing allotments, and allocations for FY 2015 and FY 2014. Although the actions in this notice have already been announced through United States Department of Agriculture
(USDA)news releases, each determination establishing, adjusting, or suspending sugar marketing allotments issued by the Secretary is required by the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended, to be published in the **Federal Register** . DATES: Effective: December 24, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barb Fecso, telephone:
(202)720-4146. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication should contact the USDA Target Center at
(202)720-2600 (voice). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Initial FY 2016 OAQ, State Allotments, and Processor Allocations Section 359c of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 (Pub. L. 75-430), as amended, (7 U.S.C. 1359cc) requires that the OAQ be established at not less than 85 percent of the estimated quantity of sugar for domestic human consumption for the crop year, and that fixed percentages of the OAQ be assigned to the beet sector and cane sector, and further allocated to the States in the cane sector. In a September 29, 2015 news release, CCC established the FY 2016 (2015-crop year) OAQ at the minimum quantity of 10,093,750 short tons, raw value (STRV). CCC distributed the FY 2016 beet sugar allotment of 5,485,953 STRV (54.35 percent of the OAQ) to the beet sugar processors and the cane sugar allotment of 4,607,797 STRV (45.65 percent of the OAQ) to the sugarcane states and processors. The FY 2016 (2015-crop year) beet sugar and cane sugar marketing allotments and allocations to date are listed in the following table: FY 2016 Overall Beet/Cane Allotments and Allocations Distribution Date of Announcement Initial FY16 allocations September 29, 2016 Beet Sugar 5,485,953 Cane Sugar 4,607,797 TOTAL OAQ 10,093,750 BEET PROCESSORS' MARKETING ALLOCATIONS: Amalgamated Sugar Co. 1,174,584 American Crystal Sugar Co. 2,017,406 Michigan Sugar Co. 566,565 Minn-Dak Farmers Co-op 380,994 So. Minn Beet Sugar Co-op 740,429 Western Sugar Co. 560,041 Wyoming Sugar Growers, LLC 45,935 TOTAL BEET SUGAR 5,485,953 STATE CANE SUGAR ALLOTMENTS: Florida 2,344,636 Louisiana 1,813,839 Texas 203,823 Hawaii 245,499 TOTAL CANE SUGAR 4,607,797 CANE PROCESSORS' MARKETING ALLOCATIONS: Florida: Florida Crystals 965,348 Growers Co-op of FL 421,765 U.S. Sugar Corp. 957,522 TOTAL 2,344,636 Louisiana: Louisiana Sugar Cane Products, Inc. 1,259,225 M.A. Patout & Sons 554,615 TOTAL 1,813,839 Texas: Rio Grande Valley 203,823 Hawaii: Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar Company 245,499 FY 2015 OAQ, State Allotments, and Processor Allocations On September 26, 2014, CCC announced the initial FY 2015 OAQ of 9,987,500 STRV, the distribution of the FY 2015 beet sugar allotment of 5,428,206 STRV (54.35 percent of the OAQ) to sugar beet processors, and the distribution of the 4,559,294 STRV cane sugar allotment (45.65 percent of the OAQ) to sugarcane states and processors. In mid-year, CCC reviewed current inventories, estimated production, expected marketings, and other factors affecting each sugar beet or sugarcane processor's ability to market its full allocation. On May 4, 2015 CCC announced an increase in the FY 2015 OAQ to 10,080,150 STRV, which was 85 percent of the estimate for domestic human consumption published in the April 2015 World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates Report (WASDE). CCC also announced the reassignment of projected surplus beet sugar and cane sugar marketing allotments and allocations under the FY 2015 Sugar Marketing Allotment Program. The reassignment, which transferred allocations from processors with surplus allocation to processors with deficit allocation, was expected to increase the available supply of domestically-produced refined beet sugar. As part of the domestic Sugar Program, CCC is required to reassign allocation to raw cane sugar imports if it is determined that processors will be unable to market their allocations and there is no CCC inventory. Data supplied by the processors in April 2015 indicated that the beet sugar sector would be unable to market 400,000 STRV of its current sugar marketing allotment, while the raw cane sugar sector would be unable to market 600,000 STRV of its sugar marketing allotment. Therefore, the allotments were reduced to 5,078,562 STRV for beet sugar and 4,001,588 STRV for cane sugar, while 1,000,000 STRV was reassigned to raw cane sugar imports already displayed in the WASDE report. This reassignment to imports was merely an accounting effort to comply with Sugar Program requirements as specified in 7 U.S.C. 1359ee and was not an increase in the raw sugar tariff-rate quota. On August 28, 2015, CCC announced a second reassignment of projected FY 2015 surplus beet sugar marketing allocation among beet processors and a reassignment of projected surplus cane sugar marketing allocation among cane processors. CCC transferred beet sugar marketing allocations from beet sugar processors with surplus allocation to another beet processor requiring more allocation to market its record high crop. Similarly, CCC transferred cane sugar marketing allocation from two sugar processors in Florida with surplus allocation to another processor requiring more allocation to market its larger-than-expected crop. The FY 2015 (2014-crop) beet sugar and cane sugar marketing allotments and allocations are listed in the following table: FY 2015 OVERALL BEET/CANE ALLOTMENTS AND ALLOCATIONS Distribution Initial FY15 allocations Change in OAQ due to change in food use Reassignment among processors Reassignment to imports Adjusted allocations Reassignment within states Reassignment among processors Adjusted allocations Date of Announcement September 26, 2014 May 4, 2015 August 28, 2015; Beet Sugar 5,428,206 50,355 0 (400,000) 5,078,562 — — 5,078,562 Cane Sugar 4,559,294 42,295 0 (600,000) 4,001,588 — — 4,001,588 Reassignment to Raw Cane Sugar Imports 0 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 — — 1,000,000 TOTAL OAQ 9,987,500 92,650 0 0 10,080,150 — — 10,080,150 BEET PROCESSORS' MARKETING ALLOCATIONS: Amalgamated Sugar Co. 1,162,220 10,781 −29,979 −71,320 1,071,703 — (2,770) 1,068,933 American Crystal Sugar Co. 1,996,116 18,565 −75,752 −180,217 1,758,711 — (11,701) 1,747,010 Michigan Sugar Co. 560,601 5,200 121,322 0 687,124 — 31,896 719,020 Minn-Dak Farmers Co-op. 376,983 3,497 44,520 0 425,000 — (4,025) 420,975 So. Minn Beet Sugar Co-op. 732,635 6,796 −58,187 −138,428 542,816 − (5,319) 537,497 Western Sugar Co. 554,200 5,093 −4,218 −10,034 545,042 — (7,555) 537,487 Wyoming Sugar Growers, LLC 45,451 422 2,294 0 48,167 —
(527)47,640 TOTAL BEET SUGAR 5,428,206 50,355 0 −400,000 5,078,562 − − 5,078,562 STATE CANE SUGAR ALLOTMENTS: Florida 2,318,566 22,732 0 −332,253 2,009,046 — — 2,009,046 Louisiana 1,793,672 17,586 0 −201,973 1,609,285 — — 1,609,285 Texas 201,557 1,976 0 −57,275 146,258 — — 146,258 Hawaii 245,499 0 0 −8,499 237,000 — — 237,000 TOTAL CANE SUGAR 4,559,294 42,295 0 −600,000 4,001,588 — — 4,001.588 CANE PROCESSORS' MARKETING ALLOCATIONS: Florida Florida Crystals 954,615 9,360 0 −210,252 753,723 (17,376) — 736,347 Growers Co-op. of FL 417,076, 4,089 0 −25,825 395,341 (2,134) — 393,206 U.S. Sugar Corp. 946,876 9,284 0 −96,177 859,983 19,510 — 879,493 TOTAL 2,318,566 22,732 0 −332,253 2,009,046 — — 2,009,046 Louisiana Louisiana Sugar Cane Products, Inc. 1,245,224 12,209 0 −168,664 1,088,768 — — 1,088,768 M.A. Patout & Sons 548,448 5,377 0 −33,308 520,517 — — 520,517 TOTAL 1,793,672 17,586 0 −201,973 1,609,285 — — 1,609,285 Texas Rio Grande Valley 201,557 1,976 0 −57,275 146,258 — — 146,258 Hawaii Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar Company 245,499 0 0 −8,499 237,000 — — 237,000 FY 2014 OAQ, State Allotments, and Processor Allocations On August 30, 2013, CCC announced the initial FY 2014 OAQ of 9,843,000 STRV, the distribution of the FY 2014 beet sugar allotment of 5,349,671 STRV (54.35 percent of the OAQ) to sugar beet processors, and the distribution of the 4,493,330 STRV cane sugar allotment (45.65 percent of the OAQ) to sugarcane states and processors. In a May 30, 2014 news release, CCC announced the reassignment of projected surplus beet sugar and cane sugar marketing allotments and allocations under the FY 2014 Sugar Marketing Allotment Program. The reassignment, which transferred allocations from processors with surplus allocation to processors with deficit allocation, was expected to increase the supply of domestically-produced sugar. Data supplied by the processors indicated that the beet sugar sector would be unable to market 100,000 STRV of its sugar marketing allotment, while the raw cane sugar sector would be unable to market 550,000 STRV of its sugar marketing allotment. Hence, the allotments were reduced to 5,249,671 STRV for beet sugar and 3,943,330 STRV for cane sugar, while 650,000 STRV was reassigned to raw cane sugar imports already expected in the WASDE report. This reassignment to imports was merely an accounting effort to comply with the Sugar Program requirements as specified in 7 U.S.C. 1359ee and was not an increase in the raw sugar tariff-rate quota. The FY 2014 (2013-crop) beet sugar and cane sugar marketing allotments and allocations are listed in the following table: FY 2014 OVERALL BEET/CANE ALLOTMENTS AND ALLOCATIONS Distribution Date of Announcement Initial FY14 allocations August 30, 2013 Reassignments among processors May 29, 2014 Reassignment to imports Adjusted allocations Beet Sugar 5,349,671 (100,000) 5,249,671 Cane Sugar 4,493,330 (550,000) 3,943,330 Reassignment to Imports of Raw Cane Sugar 650,000 650,000 TOTAL OAQ 9,843,000 9,843,000 BEET PROCESSORS' MARKETING ALLOCATIONS: Amalgamated Sugar Co. 1,145,405 (68,408) (37,305) 1,039,693 American Crystal Sugar Co 1,967,161 (34,459) (18,791) 1,913,912 Michigan Sugar Co. 552,490 107,128 659,618 Minn-Dak Farmers Co-op 371,529 76,249 447,778 So. Minn Beet Sugar Co-op 722,035 (75,606) (41,230) 605,200 Western Sugar Co. 546,256
(73)546,050 Wyoming Sugar Growers, LLC 44,794 (4,771) (2,602) 37,421 TOTAL BEET SUGAR 5,349,671 (100,000) 5,249,671 STATE CANE SUGAR ALLOTMENTS: Florida 2,283,112 (22,051) (411,110) 1,849,951 Louisiana 1,766,244 (6,044) (112,681) 1,647,519 Texas 198,475 (1,406) (26,209) 170,860 Hawaii 245,499 29,501 275,000 TOTAL CANE SUGAR 4,493,330 (550,00) 3,943,330 CANE PROCESSORS' MARKETING ALLOCATIONS: Florida Florida Crystals 940,017 (12,711) (236,976) 690,330 Growers Co-op of FL 410,698 (3,543) (66,055) 341,100 U.S. Sugar Corp. 932,397 (5,797) (108,079) 818,521 TOTAL 2,283,112 (22,051) (411,110) 1,849,951 Louisiana Louisiana Sugar Cane Products, Inc. 1,226,182 (4,826) (89,968) 1,131,388 M.A. Patout & Sons 540,061 (1,218) (22,712) 516,131 TOTAL 1,766,244 (6,044) (112,681) 1,647,519 Texas: Rio Grande Valley 198,475 (1,406) (26,209) 170,860 Hawaii: Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar Company 245,499 29,501 275,000 Authority: 15 U.S.C. 714b and 7 U.S.C. 1359hh(c). Val Dolcini, Administrator, Farm Service Agency, and Executive Vice President, Commodity Credit Corporation. [FR Doc. 2015-32456 Filed 12-23-15; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 4
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.