Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2015-11-12 · DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

357 words·~2 min read·/register/2015/11/12/2015-28635

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. CP15-537-000] DBM Pipeline, LLC; Notice of Withdrawal of Staff Protest to Proposed Blanket Certificate Activity Commission staff (Protestor) hereby withdraws its Protest to the Proposed Blanket Certificate Activity filed in the above-referenced proceeding on October 2, 2015. In its prior notice request filed on July 27, 2015 (in Docket No. CP15-537-000) and noticed on August 6, 2015, 1 DBM Pipeline, LLC (DBM Pipeline) proposed to construct and operate approximately 9 miles of 20-inch-diameter pipeline in Reeves and Culberson Counties, Texas, and Eddy County, New Mexico (Project).
Protestor protested the prior notice request filed under the provisions of Part 157, subpart F, of the Commission's regulations, because DBM Pipeline did not file in its application or supplemental filings, the Bureau of Land Management comments on the Project and did not provide adequate avoidance plans to have no effect on historic properties. In addition DBM Pipeline did not provide complete responses to the FERC Environmental Data Request dated September 23, 2015. 1 Notice of the request was published in the **Federal Register** on August 13, 2015 (80 *Fed.
Reg.* 48520). Protestor notes that on November 3, 2015, DBM Pipeline filed a data response with comments from the Texas and New Mexico State Historic Preservation Officers (SHPOs), dated June 23, 2015 and October 27, 2015 respectively, stating that the Project would either have no effect on or would avoid historic properties. DBM Pipeline also filed an avoidance plan for three cultural resources in New Mexico. Additionally, the BLM agreed with the avoidance plan and stated the Project would have no effect on historic properties in a letter dated November 2, 2015.
FERC staff agrees with the Texas and New Mexico SHPOs and finds the avoidance plan acceptable. Finally, DBM Pipeline submitted complete responses to the FERC Environmental Data Request dated September 23, 2015. Thus, Protestor's environmental concern has been satisfied. Accordingly, Protestor hereby withdraws its Protest to the Proposed Blanket Certificate Activity filed in the instant docket on October 2, 2015. Dated: November 4, 2015. Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015-28635 Filed 11-10-15; 8:45 am]
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.