Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2014-05-27 · DEPARTMENT OF LABOR · Notices

Notices. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

361 words·~2 min read·/register/2014/05/27/2014-12054

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-85,145] AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company, a Subsidiary of AXA Financial, Inc., Including On-Site Leased Workers of Kelly Services, Charlotte, North Carolina; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration By application dated May 5, 2014, a worker requested administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's negative determination regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, applicable to workers and former workers of AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company, a subsidiary of AXA Financial, Inc., Charlotte, North Carolina (subject firm).
The Department's Notice of determination was published in the **Federal Register** on May 5, 2014 (79 FR 25625). Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under the following circumstances:
(1)If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered that the determination complained of was erroneous;
(2)If it appears that the determination complained of was based on a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
(3)If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a mis-interpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the decision. The negative determination was based on the Department's findings that the subject firm does not produce an article, within the meaning of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. The request for reconsideration stated that services supplied by the subject workers shifted to a foreign country. The petitioner did not supply facts not previously considered; nor provide additional documentation indicating that there was either
(1)a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered or
(2)a misinterpretation of facts or of the law justifying reconsideration of the initial determination. Based on these findings, the Department determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not been met. Conclusion After careful review of the application and investigative findings, I conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department of Labor's prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied. Signed in Washington, DC, this 15th day of May, 2014. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2014-12054 Filed 5-23-14; 8:45 am]
Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 29 CFR 90.18(c)
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Cite29 CFR 90.18(c)
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.