Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2014-02-26 · Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) · Notices

Notices. Notice of final order on petition to object to a state operating permit

659 words·~3 min read·/register/2014/02/26/2014-04174

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [Petition IV-2011-1; FRL-9907-12-Region 9] Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Petition for Objection to State Operating Permit for Hu Honua Bioenergy Facility, LLC; Pepeekeo, Hawaii AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice of final order on petition to object to a state operating permit. SUMMARY: Pursuant to Clean Air Act
(CAA)Section 505(b)(2) and 40 CFR 70.8(d), the EPA Administrator signed an Order, dated February 7, 2014, partially granting and partially denying a petition to object to a CAA title V operating permit proposed by the Clean Air Branch, Environmental Management Division, Hawaii Department of Health
(HDOH)for the Hu Honua Bioenergy Facility, LLC (Hu Honua) in Pepeekeo, Hawaii. For the Issues that EPA denied, the Order constitutes a final action on the petition submitted by the Law Office of Marc Chytilo, on behalf of Preserve Pepeekeo Health & Environment (Petitioner), on August 26, 2011. Pursuant to section 505(b)(2) of the CAA, a petitioner may seek judicial review in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit of those portions of the petition which EPA denied. Any petition for review shall be filed within 60 days from the date this notice appears in the Federal Register, pursuant to section 307 of the CAA. ADDRESSES: Copies of the Order, the petition, and all pertinent information relating thereto are on file at the following location: EPA Region 9; Air Division; 75 Hawthorne Street; San Francisco, California 94105. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gerardo Rios, Air Permits Office, EPA Region 9, at
(415)972-3974 or *rios.gerardo@epa.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CAA affords EPA a 45-day period to review and, as appropriate, the authority to object to operating permits proposed by state permitting authorities under title V of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7661-7661f. Section 505(b)(2) of the CAA and 40 CFR 70.8(d) authorize any person to petition the EPA Administrator to object to a title V operating permit within 60 days after the expiration of EPA's 45-day review period if EPA has not objected on its own initiative. Petitions must be based only on objections to the permit that were raised with reasonable specificity during the public comment period provided by the state, unless the petitioner demonstrates that it was impracticable to raise these issues during the comment period or the grounds for the issues arose after this period. The petitioner submitted a petition regarding Hu Honua on August 26, 2011, requesting that EPA object to the CAA title V operating permit, identified as Covered Source Permit Number 0724-01-C. The Petitioner alleged that the permit was not consistent with the CAA because:
(1)EPA raised objectionable issues in its comment letter on the proposed permit;
(2)the permit fails to ensure compliance with criteria air pollutant emission limits;
(3)the permit fails to ensure compliance with Best Available Control Technology
(BACT)requirements for CO;
(4)the permit fails to ensure compliance with hazardous air pollutant
(HAP)emission limits;
(5)the baghouse is not adequately described or monitored;
(6)the permit fails to ensure compliance with applicable state law and State Implementation Plan
(SIP)requirements;
(7)the permit fails to ensure compliance with Maximum Achievable Control Technology
(MACT)requirements for major sources of HAPs;
(8)the permit impermissibly exempts startups and shutdowns from emissions limits;
(9)the facility's biomass handling, chipping, and storage operations do not qualify as an “insignificant activity”;
(10)the permit fails to address emissions from trona or lime and ash handling;
(11)HDOH failed to address ammonia slip and sulfuric acid mist emissions;
(12)HDOH failed to directly regulate and evaluate the impacts of PM <sup>2.5</sup> ; and
(13)HDOH failed to adequately respond to significant public comments. On February 7, 2014, the Administrator issued an Order partially granting and partially denying the petition. The Order explains EPA's rationale for partially granting and partially denying the petition. Dated: February 11, 2014. Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, Region IX. [FR Doc. 2014-04174 Filed 2-25-14; 8:45 am]
Connections2 off-index
2 references not yet in our index
  • 40 CFR 70.8(d)
  • 42 USC 7661-7661f
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice of final order on petition to object to a state operating permit
Cite40 CFR 70.8(d)
Cite42 USC 7661-7661f
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.