Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2013-07-10 · Federal Energy Regulatory Commission · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Notice of proposed rulemaking

436 words·~2 min read·/register/2013/07/10/2013-16495

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 18 CFR Part 40 [Docket No. RM13-8-000] Electric Reliability Organization Proposal To Retire Requirements in Reliability Standards AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to the proposed rule (RM13-8-000) which was published in the **Federal Register** of Friday, June 28, 2013 (78 FR 38851). The proposed regulations would approve the retirement of 34 requirements within 19 Reliability Standards identified by the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC), the Commission-certified Electric Reliability Organization.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Ryan (Legal Information), Office of the General Counsel, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, Telephone:
(202)502-6840. Michael Gandolfo (Technical Information), Office of Electric Reliability, Division of Reliability Standards and Security, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, Telephone:
(202)502-6817. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Errata Notice On June 20, 2013, the Commission issued a “Notice of Proposed Rulemaking” in the above-captioned proceeding, *Electric Reliability Organization Proposal to Retire Requirements in Reliability Standards,* 143 FERC ¶ 61,251 (2013). This errata notice serves to correct P 90 and the associated table. Specifically, in P 90, the estimate “$535,500” in the first sentence is changed to “$518,220.” In the table in P 90, the “Estimated Total Annual Reduction in Burden (in hours)” for FAC-013-2, R3 and INT-007-1, R1.2 is changed from “1,600” to “640” and from “448” to “1,120,” respectively, and the Total is changed from “8,925” to “8,637.” In addition, in the table in P 90, the “Estimated Total Annual Reduction in Cost” for FAC-013-2, R3 and INT-007-1, R1.2 is changed from “$96,000” to “$38,400” and from “$26,880” to “$67,200,” respectively, and the Total is changed from “$535,500” to “$518,220.” In FR Doc. 2013-15433 appearing on page 38851 in the **Federal Register** of Friday, June 28, 2013, the same corrections are made: 1. On page 38860, in P 90, the estimate “$535,500” in the first sentence is changed to “$518,220.” 2. On page 38860, in the table in P 90, the “Estimated Total Annual Reduction in Burden (in hours)” for FAC-013-2, R3 and INT-007-1, R1.2 is changed from “1,600” to “640” and from “448” to “1,120,” respectively, and the Total is changed from “8,925” to “8,637.” 3. On page 38860, in the table in P 90, the “Estimated Total Annual Reduction in Cost” for FAC-013-2, R3 and INT-007-1, R1.2 is changed from “$96,000” to “$38,400” and from “$26,880” to “$67,200,” respectively, and the Total is changed from “$535,500” to “$518,220.” Dated: July 3, 2013. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2013-16495 Filed 7-9-13; 8:45 am]
Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 18 CFR 40
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Notice of proposed rulemaking
Cite18 CFR 40
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.