Notices. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
538 words·~2 min read·
/register/2010/08/25/2010-21080A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of the Secretary Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request The Department of Labor
(DOL)hereby announces the submission of the following public information collection request
(ICR)to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35). A copy of this ICR, with applicable supporting documentation; including, among other things, a description of the likely respondents, proposed frequency of response, and estimated total burden may be obtained from the RegInfo.gov Web site at *http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain* or by contacting Linda Watts Thomas on 202-693-4223 (this is not a toll-free number) and e-mail mail to: *DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov.* Interested parties are encouraged to send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the Department of Labor—Employment and Training Administration, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503, Telephone: 202-395-7316/Fax 202-395-5806 (these are not toll-free numbers), e-mail: *OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov* within 30 days from the date of this publication in the **Federal Register.** In order to ensure the appropriate consideration, comments should reference the applicable OMB Control Number (see below). The OMB is particularly interested in comments which:
(1)Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;
(2)Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
(3)Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(4)Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. *Agency:* Employment and Training Administration. *Type of Review:* Extension without changes of a currently approved information collection. *Title of Collection:* Attestation by Employers using Alien Crewmembers for Longshore Activities in U.S. Ports—Form ETA-9033. *OMB Control Number:* 1205-0309. *Frequency:* On occasion. *Form Numbers:* ETA-9033. *Affected Public:* Businesses or Other For-Profits. *Cost to Federal Government:* $0. *Estimated Number of Respondents:* 1. *Total Number of Responses:* 1. *Total Burden Hours:* 4. *Total Hour Burden Cost (Operating/Maintaining):* $0. *Description:* The information collection is required by section 258 of the Immigration and Nationality Act
(INA)(8 U.S.C. 1288). The INA has a prevailing practice exception to the general prohibition on the performance of longshore work by alien crewmembers in U.S. ports. Under the prevailing practice exception, before any employer may use alien crewmembers to perform longshore activities in U.S. ports, it must submit an attestation to the Secretary of Labor containing the elements prescribed by the INA. The INA further requires that the Secretary of Labor make available for public examination in Washington, DC, a list of employers that have filed attestations and, for each of these employers, a copy of the employer's attestation and accompanying documentation received by the Secretary. For additional information, see related notice published in the **Federal Register** on June 10, 2010, (75 FR 32971). Dated: August 11, 2010. Linda Watts Thomas, Acting Departmental Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. 2010-21080 Filed 8-24-10; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
1 reference not yet in our index
- Pub. L. 104-13
Citation graph
cites case law
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources