Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2010-03-09 · Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior · Notices

Notices. Notice of Availability; receipt of application; reopening of comment period

416 words·~2 min read·/register/2010/03/09/2010-4886

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4312-51-P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service [FWS-R8-ES-2010-N012; 81420-1113-0000-F3] Proposed Programmatic Safe Harbor Agreement for the Sacramento River Conservation Area Forum in Shasta, Tehama, Butte, Glenn, Colusa, Yolo, and Sutter Counties, CA AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of Availability; receipt of application; reopening of comment period. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), recently announced our receipt of an application for an Enhancement of Survival Permit from the Sacramento River Conservation Area Forum (applicant) under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act).
We now reopen the comment period on this application and the associated proposed safe harbor agreement. If you have previously submitted comments, please do not resubmit them because we have already incorporated them in the public record and will fully consider them in our final decision. DATES: To ensure consideration, please send your written comments by April 8, 2010. ADDRESSES: Send comments to Ms. Kathy Brown, via U.S. mail at U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office, 2800 Cottage Way, W-2605, Sacramento, California 95825; or via facsimile to
(916)414-6713. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Kathy Brown, Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office ( *see* ADDRESSES ); telephone:
(916)414-6600; facsimile:
(916)414-6713. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 21, 2009, we published a **Federal Register** notice (74 FR 67897) announcing our receipt of an application for an Enhancement of Survival Permit from the Sacramento River Conservation Area Forum under the Act (16 U.S.C 1531 *et seq.* ). The permit application includes a proposed Safe Harbor Agreement (Agreement) between the Applicant and us for the Federally threatened valley elderberry longhorn beetle ( *Desmocerus californicus dimorphus* ) and the Federally threatened giant garter snake ( *Thamnophis gigas* ). We took comments on the available documents until January 20, 2010. In response to several requests from local government agencies, non-governmental organizations, and the general public we are reopening the comment period for an additional 30 days. We will consider these public comments in our final version of the document. For information on how to review available documents and submit comments or questions, along with background information on the safe harbor agreement process, see our December 21, 2009, notice (74 FR 67897). We provide this notice under section 10(c) of the Act and our National Environmental Policy Act implementing regulations (40 CFR 1506.6). Dated: March 2, 2010. Susan K. Moore, Field Supervisor, Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office, Sacramento, California. [FR Doc. 2010-4886 Filed 3-8-10; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 40 CFR 1506.6
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice of Availability; receipt of application; reopening of comment period
Cite40 CFR 1506.6
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.