Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2010-03-02 · Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Withdrawal of notice of proposed rulemaking

492 words·~2 min read·/register/2010/03/02/2010-4374

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau 27 CFR Parts 28 and 44 [Docket No. TTB-2009-0005; Notice No. 102; Re: Notice Nos. 100 & 101] RIN 1513-AB77 Drawback of Internal Revenue Excise Taxes AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury. ACTION: Withdrawal of notice of proposed rulemaking. SUMMARY: This document withdraws a notice of proposed rulemaking, published in the **Federal Register** on October 15, 2009, that proposed conforming amendments to reflect proposed Customs and Border Protection regulations stating that domestic merchandise on which no tax is paid under the Internal Revenue Code may not be substituted for imported merchandise for purposes of claims for drawback of tax under the customs laws and regulations.
The notice is being withdrawn to permit further consideration of the relevant issues involved in the proposed rulemaking. DATES: The proposed rulemaking is withdrawn on March 2, 2010. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gerry Isenberg, Regulations and Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street, NW., Suite 200-E, Washington, DC 20220; telephone
(202)453-2097. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On October 15, 2009, the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
(TTB)published in the **Federal Register** a notice of proposed rulemaking to amend its regulations to clarify the relationship between tax payment under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and drawback of tax under the Tariff Act of 1930. See Notice No. 100 at 74 FR 52937. Specifically, TTB's proposed rulemaking would have provided conforming regulations to reflect proposed Customs and Border Protection
(CBP)regulations stating that domestic merchandise on which no tax is paid under the Internal Revenue Code may not be substituted for imported merchandise for purposes of claims for drawback of tax under the customs laws and regulations. TTB later extended the comment period closing date for its proposal until January 14, 2010. See Notice No. 101, November 27, 2009, at 74 FR 62266. The CBP notice of proposed rulemaking regarding drawback of internal revenue excise tax, on which TTB's proposed rulemaking was based, also was published in the **Federal Register** on October 15, 2009, at 74 FR 52928. CBP twice extended the comment period on its proposal to allow additional time for interested parties to comment on the proposed rulemaking. See the CBP notices of November 4, 2009 (74 FR 57125), and November 25, 2009 (74 FR 61585). The CPB proposal's comment period ended on January 12, 2010. Withdrawal of Notice No. 100 The proposed CBP regulations published on October 15, 2009, and on which TTB's proposed rulemaking was based, are being withdrawn to allow for further consideration of the issues involved. Consistent with the CBP action, TTB withdraws its proposed rulemaking, Notice No. 100, published in the **Federal Register** on October 15, 2009 at 74 FR 52928. Dated: February 3, 2010. John J. Manfreda, Administrator. Approved: February 25, 2010. Michael Mundaca, Acting Assistant Secretary (Tax Policy). [FR Doc. 2010-4374 Filed 3-1-10; 8:45 am]
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.