Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2010-02-10 · Postal Service · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Final rule

440 words·~2 min read·/register/2010/02/10/2010-2844

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4810-02-P POSTAL SERVICE 39 CFR Part 965 Rules of Practice in Proceedings Relative to Mail Disputes AGENCY: Postal Service. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: This document revises the rules of practice of the Postal Service's Office of the Judicial Officer to allow qualified persons licensed to practice law to be designated by the Judicial Officer as presiding officers in proceedings relating to mail disputes. DATES: *Effective Date:* March 1, 2010. ADDRESSES: Judicial Officer Department, United States Postal Service, 2101 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 600, Arlington, VA 22201-3078. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Administrative Judge Gary E. Shapiro,
(703)812-1910. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A. Executive Summary 39 CFR Part 965 contains the rules governing proceedings involving Mail Disputes. Only one change is made. Paragraph
(a)of section 965.4 of the rules has defined the “presiding officer” as an Administrative Law Judge or an Administrative Judge qualified in accordance with law. The revised rule expands the definition of presiding officer to include any other qualified person licensed to practice law designated by the Judicial Officer to preside over a proceeding conducted pursuant to this part. B. Summary of Change Expanding the definition of presiding officer in Part 965 is intended to permit qualified staff counsel employed in the Office of the Judicial Officer to be designated as the initial presiding official authorized to conduct proceedings and issue Initial Decisions in the resolution of mail disputes. Administrative Law Judges and Administrative Judges qualified in accordance with law will continue to be designated as presiding officers in such matters. The appellate procedure is unchanged. C. Effective Dates and Applicability These revised rules will govern proceedings under Part 965 docketed on or after March 1, 2010. List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 965 Administrative practice and procedure, Mail disputes, Postal Service. For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Postal Service amends 39 CFR Part 965 as set forth below: 1. The authority citation for part 965 continues to read as follows: Authority: 39 U.S.C. 204, 401. 2. In § 965.4, paragraph
(a)is revised to read as follows: § 965.4 Presiding officers.
(a)The presiding officer shall be an Administrative Law Judge, an Administrative Judge qualified in accordance with law, or any other qualified person licensed to practice law designated by the Judicial Officer to preside over a proceeding conducted pursuant to this part. The Judicial Officer assigns cases under this part. Judicial Officer includes Associate Judicial Officer upon delegation thereto. The Judicial Officer may, on his or her own initiative or for good cause found, preside at the reception of evidence. Stanley F. Mires, Chief Counsel, Legislative. [FR Doc. 2010-2844 Filed 2-9-10; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 39 CFR 965
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Final rule
Cite39 CFR 965
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.