Notices. Notice; request for applications
15,269 words·~69 min read·
/register/2008/02/04/08-494A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Highway Administration Express Lanes Demonstration Program AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT. ACTION: Notice; request for applications. SUMMARY: Section 1604(b) of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) (Pub. L. 109-59; Aug. 10, 2005), authorizes the Secretary of Transportation (Secretary) to carry out 15 demonstration projects to permit States, public authorities, or public or private entities designated by States, the authority to collect a toll from a motor vehicle on an eligible toll facility.
This notice invites States, public authorities, or other entities as designated by States to apply to participate in the Express Lanes Demonstration Program. It also presents guidelines for program applications and participation. DATES: Applications must be received no later than May 31, 2009. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions about this notice, contact Mr. Wayne Berman, Office of Operations,
(202)366-4069, ( *Wayne.Berman@dot.gov* ); for legal questions contact Mr. Michael Harkins, Attorney Advisor, Office of the Chief Counsel,
(202)366-4928, ( *Michael.Harkins@dot.gov* ). The FHWA is located at 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. Office hours are from 7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Electronic Access An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded from the **Federal Register's** home page at: *http://www.archives.gov* and the Government Printing Office's database at: *http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara.* Background There is a growing consensus among transportation policymakers and economists that existing financing mechanisms for highway and aviation infrastructure are unsustainable in the long-term and will be unable to keep pace with projected demands on the transportation network. In May 2006, the National Strategy to Reduce Congestion on America's Transportation Network was introduced by the U.S. Department of Transportation to set forth several initiatives to relieve congestion. 1 The Express Lanes Demonstration Program furthers the goals of the National Strategy to Reduce Congestion by allowing States to better manage congestion and improve their ability to finance new or expanded highway capacity through the use of tolling. 1 Speaking before the National Retail Federation's annual conference on May 16, 2006, in Washington, DC, former U.S. Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta unveiled a new plan to reduce congestion plaguing America's roads, rails, and airports. The National Strategy to Reduce Congestion on America's Transportation Network includes a number of initiatives designed to reduce transportation congestion. The transcripts of these remarks is available at the following URL: *http://www.dot.gov/affairs/minetasp051606.htm.* SAFETEA-LU offers States broader authority to use tolling on a pilot or demonstration basis. The Express Lanes Demonstration
(ELD)program is a new pilot program that permits tolling on selected new and existing Interstate lanes to manage high levels of congestion, reduce emissions in a non-attainment or maintenance area, or finance added Interstate lanes for the purpose of reducing congestion. The ELD program is one of six Federal tolling programs. There is no special Federal funding specifically authorized for this program. For further information on other Federal tolling programs available, please refer to the **Federal Register** notice published on January 6, 2006 (71 FR 965), entitled “Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU); Opportunities for State and Other Qualifying Agencies to Gain Authority to Toll Facilities Constructed Using Federal Funds.” Demonstration Projects Section 1604(b)(2) authorizes the Secretary to carry out 15 demonstration projects under the ELD program. A demonstration project may include more than one facility so long as such facilities interrelate in a regional strategy to manage high levels of congestion, to reduce emissions in a nonattainment area, or to finance the expansion of a highway for the purpose of reducing traffic congestion. There is no special Federal funding specifically authorized for this program. Regular Federal-aid highway funds may be used, subject to the normal eligibility requirements for these funds. Eligible Project Types The ELD program permits tolling on any newly constructed Interstate or non-Interstate lanes. In addition, existing Interstate or non-Interstate facilities that are modified or constructed to create toll lanes are eligible to collect tolls on the entire facility. Additionally, existing Interstate or non-Interstate HOV facilities are eligible to collect tolls on the entire facility. Eligible toll facilities fall under four broad categories of new and existing highway capacity. Specifically, section 1604(b)(1)(A) of SAFETEA-LU lists the following four types of eligible toll facilities: 1. A facility in existence on August 10, 2005 (date of enactment of SAFETEA-LU), that collects tolls; 2. A facility in existence on August 10, 2005, that serves high occupancy vehicles (HOV); 3. A facility modified or constructed after August 10, 2005, to create additional tolled lane capacity, including a facility constructed by a private entity or using private funds; and 4. In the case of a new lane added to a previously non-tolled facility, only the new lane. Definitions For the purposes of the ELD program, the following definitions are provided to clarify various terms and phrases having special significance in the ELD program: A “demonstration project,” for the purpose of this program, means a project that involves collecting a toll from a motor vehicle at an eligible toll facility for the purposes of meeting the goals set forth for this program. A “facility that serves high occupancy vehicles” or “HOV facility” provides any preferential treatment through an exclusive lane(s), park-and-ride lots, or other support facilities or elements. The preferential treatment must give priority to buses, vanpools, carpools or high-occupancy vehicles either all or part of the day. The facility must have been in existence and providing such preferential treatment on August 10, 2005. An “HOV lane” provides any preferential lane designated for exclusive use by vehicles with 2 or more occupants for all or part of a day, including a designated lane on a freeway, other highway or a street, or independent roadway on a separate right-of-way. The phrase “modified or constructed” for the purposes of the ELD program means improvements made to the existing lanes. Examples include reconstruction, rehabilitation, resurfacing, or restoring the existing lanes, reconfiguration of entrance and exit ramps, the installation of toll barriers, and restriping to create additional lanes. “Toll Agreement” means the agreement required to be executed between the FHWA and a State and other public authorities or private entity to grant the authority to collect tolls. The toll agreement must be executed by the Executive Director of the FHWA and the relevant State department of transportation and other third parties, as appropriate, and shall provide that any toll revenues received from the operation of the toll facility will be used in accordance with section 1604(b)(3)(A) of SAFETEA-LU. Each executed agreement constitutes one demonstration project and must be executed between the FHWA, the relevant State department of transportation, and any other applicable public authority or private entity to a demonstration project prior to September 30, 2009. Tolling Existing Capacity There are two ways that existing non-tolled capacity may be tolled under this pilot program. First, section 1604(b)(1)(A)(ii) of SAFETEA-LU allows a State to toll a facility in existence on August 10, 2005, that serves high occupancy vehicles. As stated in the definitions, these facilities are those that provide any preferential treatment to buses, vanpools, carpools, or HOVs. One example of a facility eligible for tolling under this provision is one with a designated HOV lane. Another example of a facility that is eligible for tolling under this provision is one with designated commuter parking or is served by bus rapid transit. Second, section 1604(b)(1)(A)(iii) allows a State to toll a facility that is modified or constructed after August 10, 2005, to create additional tolled lane capacity. This provision would allow States to toll the existing non-tolled lanes when a new toll-lane is created and the existing lanes are modified or constructed (note that section 1604(b)(1)(A)(iv) would only allow the new lane to be tolled if the existing lanes are not modified or constructed). While the existing lanes must be modified or constructed, improvements do not need to be made throughout the entire length of the project. Tolling will be permitted on the existing lanes if the improvements are expected to improve or benefit, directly or indirectly, the operational performance of the entire length of the facility proposed to be tolled. The State must demonstrate these benefits to the FHWA in the required application. Toll Agreements As provided at section 1604(b)(3)(C) of SAFETEA-LU, a toll agreement must be executed prior to the collection of tolls on any toll facility under a demonstration project. Since authority to carry-out demonstration projects is only granted through the end of fiscal year 2009, a toll agreement must be executed prior to September 30, 2009. While a toll agreement must be executed prior to September 30, 2009, tolling may commence anytime after this date. In general, the toll agreement will restrict the use of revenues collected on any toll facilities operating under any demonstration project and will be executed by the FHWA, State, and other relevant public authorities or private parties. More details on the revenue use restrictions are discussed below. Eligible Uses of Revenue As provided in section 1604(b)(3)(A) of SAFETEA-LU, toll revenues received under the Express Lanes Demonstration Program shall be used by a State, public authority, or private entity designated by a State, for the following purposes: 1. Debt service; 2. Reasonable return on investment of any private financing; 3. To fund the costs necessary for proper operation and maintenance of any facilities used for this demonstration program (including reconstruction, resurfacing, restoration, and rehabilitation); or 4. If the State, public authority, or private entity annually certifies that the eligible toll facility is being adequately operated and maintained, the toll revenues may be used for any other purpose relating to a highway or transit project carried out under title 23 or 49, United States Code. Electronic Toll Collection As outlined in section 1604(b)(5) of SAFETEA-LU, fees collected under this program shall be collected only through the use of noncash electronic technology that optimizes the free flow of traffic on the tolled facility. Project sponsors are also encouraged to explore interoperability of other noncash electronic technology in their respective regions. In order to advance the requirements under this Section, a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, titled “Interoperability Requirements, Standards, or Performance Specifications for Automated Toll Collection Systems” was published in the **Federal Register** on September 20, 2007, at 72 FR 53736. HOV Lanes As provided in section 1604(b)(3)(B)(iii) of SAFETEA-LU, a State may permit motor vehicles with a single occupant to operate in a HOV lane pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 166. Under 23 U.S.C. 166, a State may allow single occupant vehicles to operate in a HOV lane only if the operator is charged a toll. Additionally, 23 U.S.C. 166 permits single occupant motorcycles, bicycles, public transportation vehicles, inherently low emission vehicles (ILEVs), and other low emission and energy efficient vehicles to operate in a HOV lane. However, the exception for ILEVs and other low emission and energy efficient vehicles expires on September 30, 2009. Should a State allow any single occupant vehicles to use a HOV lane, 23 U.S.C. 166(d) mandates that the State carry-out certain responsibilities with respect to enforcement as well as monitoring, evaluating, and reporting on the impacts such vehicles have to the operation of the HOV lane. Title 23 U.S.C. 166(d) also requires the State to limit or discontinue the use of the facility by any single occupant vehicles should the presence of such vehicles on the facility degrade the facility's operation. Additionally, section 1604(b)(3)(B)(ii) requires that the tolls on any HOV facility vary in price according to time of day or level of traffic as appropriate to manage congestion or improve air quality. Program Coordination and Assistance The FHWA, Office of Operations, is responsible for coordinating all tolling and pricing programs that now exist under the Federal-aid highway program. The Express Lanes Demonstration Program is one of six tolling programs or provisions that currently exists for Federal-aid highways. The FHWA Tolling and Pricing Opportunities Web site is located at *http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/tolling_pricing* . The Office of Operations has formed a working group known as the “Tolling and Pricing Team.” The key role for the Tolling and Pricing Team is to assist public authorities by directing them to the most appropriate program (or programs) among the options available. Members of the Tolling and Pricing Team represent the FHWA Offices of Operations and Infrastructure—the primary offices responsible for administering each of the tolling and pricing programs—and other oversight offices within the U.S. Department of Transportation, including, but not limited to the Office of the Secretary and the FHWA Offices of the Administrator and Chief Counsel. The “Expression of Interest” A public authority that wants to request authority under any Federal tolling program, including the Express Lanes Demonstration Program, or other tolling and funding authority is asked to submit an Expression of Interest to the Tolling and Pricing Team in care of the FHWA Office of Operations in Washington, DC at the address listed below. Submittal of an Expression of Interest is optional, but is strongly recommended so that the Tolling and Pricing Team can confirm that an application is best suited to the tolling authority requested. An Expression of Interest template can be downloaded at *http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/tolling_pricing/participation.htm* . Use of the template is optional. The Expression of Interest may be attached as an e-mail to *TollingandPricingTeam@dot.gov,* or a hardcopy can be mailed to Mr. Wayne Berman, FHWA Office of Operations, HOTM, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. Concurrently, the Expression of Interest should be copied to the respective State FHWA Division Office. The Expression of Interest is a document—in letter, memo, or report format—that provides the rationale for the intended project. A complete Expression of Interest will enable the Tolling and Pricing Team to provide the best assistance and identify the range of options possible to meet intended goals and timeframes. The Tolling and Pricing Team reviews all “Expressions of Interest” for the various tolling opportunities contained in current law but does not have responsibility to approve or disapprove specific projects. That responsibility will remain with each of the respective FHWA program offices responsible for administering a specific tolling and pricing program. By requesting and reviewing all Expressions of Interest, the Tolling and Pricing Team can effectively guide an applicant to the most appropriate program. Formal Application Procedures Pursuant to section 1604(b)(4) of SAFETEA-LU, States, public authorities or private entities must submit a formal application to the FHWA in order to be eligible to participate in the program, regardless of whether the recommended Expression of Interest is submitted or not. Applicants are strongly encouraged to coordinate with their contacts at the FHWA Division office in their State as they are developing their application. A formal application will only be approved if the project meets the necessary requirements and objectives of the program set forth in section 1604(b) of SAFETEA-LU. As outlined in section 1604(b)(4) of SAFETEA-LU, the formal application must contain the following information in order to qualify as a demonstration project: 1. A description of the project, including construction that may be involved; 2. An identification and description of the type of facility proposed to be tolled; 3. A specific description of which lanes are intended to be tolled, and for which limits; 4. A timeline of project development process, including key milestones over the next 3 years and the anticipated date a toll agreement will be executed; 5. A description of the congestion or air quality problems sought to be addressed under the program; 6. A description of the performance goals sought to be achieved under the program, which should include goals related to addressing the effects on travel, traffic, and air quality; the distribution of benefits and burdens on users of the facility; the use of alternative modes of transportation; and the use of revenues to transportation or impact mitigation needs; 7. Plans for regular monitoring and reporting on the achievement of the project's performance goals; 8. An identification of the timing on when the facility will begin tolling motor vehicles and for how long a period tolling will be in effect; 9. Description of the type of noncash technology and standards that will be applied to automate the tolling operations; and 10. Description of tolling strategy considered, for instance, fixed or variable pricing. The formal application should be submitted directly through the State Department of Transportation to the appropriate FHWA Division Administrator. The FHWA Division will then forward the application to Mr. Wayne Berman, c/o the Office of Operations, HOTM, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, or via e-mail at *wayne.berman@dot.gov.* Upon finding that the application provides relevant information pertaining to the above listed factors, the FHWA will determine whether to accept the application and grant authority to toll motor vehicles on the facility. The FHWA's determination will based, in part, upon availability of program slots and competition with other pending and anticipated project applications, including projects that further the objectives of the “Congestion Initiative” (see *http://www.fightgridlocknow.gov/* ), such as for the Corridors of the Future or the Urban Partnership Initiatives. Any applications received by the FHWA prior to the publication of this Notice need only address the minimum eligibility factors contained in section 1604(b)(4)(A) &
(B)of SAFETEA-LU. For further questions about the formal application process, please contact Mr. Wayne Berman, Office of Operations at
(202)366-4069. Performance Goals and Monitoring Pursuant to section 1604(b)(7) of SAFETEA-LU, the Secretary, in cooperation with the State, public authority, private entity, and other program participants must develop performance goals for each project and publish such goals for public comment. These performance goals will first be proposed by the State, public authority, private entity, or other program participant in the formal application to participate in the program. These goals must include goals related to addressing the effects on travel, traffic, and air quality; the distribution of benefits and burdens on users of the facility; the use of alternative modes of transportation; and the use of revenues to transportation or impact mitigation needs. The FHWA will review the performance goals and provide feedback to the applicant if the FHWA has any questions or comments. Once satisfied with the project's performance goals, the FHWA will publish these goals in the **Federal Register** and solicit public comment, as required in section 1604(b). Additionally, section 1604(b)(7) of SAFETEA-LU requires the Secretary, in cooperation with the State, public authority, private entity, and other program participants, to establish a program for regular monitoring and reporting on the achievement of the performance goals. A description of the monitoring program should be included in the project's application, and should include a process whereby the State, public authority, private entity, and other program participant will report on the project's achievement of the performance goals by March 31 of each year. In the case where a private entity has been designated by the State to carry out the demonstration project, the private entity shall work with the State in evaluating the performance goals. Once the FHWA is satisfied with the monitoring and reporting program, the FHWA will publish a description of the program in the **Federal Register** and solicit public comment. The establishment of the performance goals and a monitoring program required by section 1604(b)(7) of SAFETEA-LU, including the publication of such goals and monitoring in the **Federal Register** and solicitation of public comment, does not need to occur prior to the FHWA's approval of the State's application. Authority: Section 1604(b) of Public Law 109-59; 23 U.S.C. 315; 49 CFR 1.48. Issued on: January 24, 2008. J. Richard Capka, Federal Highway Administrator. [FR Doc. E8-1932 Filed 2-1-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-22-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration [Docket No. FMCSA-2006-25756] Commercial Driver's License
(CDL)Standards; Volvo Trucks North America, Renewal of Exemption AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of renewal of exemption; request for comments. SUMMARY: FMCSA renews Volvo Trucks North America's (Volvo) exemption from the Agency's requirement for certain drivers of commercial motor vehicles
(CMVs)to hold a commercial driver's license (CDL). Volvo requested that its exemption for eight Swedish engineers and technicians be renewed to enable these individuals to continue test driving CMVs in the United States for Volvo. All of the individuals hold a valid Swedish CDL. FMCSA believes the knowledge and skills testing and training program that drivers must undergo for a Swedish CDL ensures a level of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the level of safety that would be obtained by complying with the U.S. requirement for a CDL. DATES: This decision is effective February 4, 2008. Comments must be received on or before March 5, 2008. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Federal Docket Management System Number FMCSA-2006-25756 by any of the following methods: • Web Site: *http://www.regulations.gov.* Follow the instructions for submitting comments on the Federal electronic docket site. • *Fax:* 1-202-493-2251. • *Mail:* Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. • *Hand Delivery:* Ground Floor, Room W12-140, DOT Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. *Instructions:* All submissions must include the Agency name and docket number. For detailed instructions on submitting comments and additional information on the exemption process, see the Public Participation heading below. Note that all comments received will be posted without change to *http://www.regulations.gov,* including any personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading below. *Docket:* For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to *http://www.regulations.gov* at any time or to the ground floor, Room W12-140, DOT Building, New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. *Privacy Act:* Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the **Federal Register** published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you may visit *http://www.regulations.gov.* *Public participation:* The *http://www.regulations.gov* Web site is generally available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. You can get electronic submission and retrieval help and guidelines under the “help” section of the *http://www.regulations.gov* web site and also at the DOT's *http://docketsinfo.dot.gov* Web site. If you want us to notify you that we received your comments, please include a self-addressed, stamped envelope or postcard or print the acknowledgement page that appears after submitting comments online. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Richard Clemente, FMCSA Driver and Carrier Operations Division; Office of Bus and Truck Standards and Operations; Telephone: 202-366-4325. E-mail: *MCPSD@dot.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Under 49 U.S.C. 31315 and 31136(e), FMCSA may renew an exemption from the commercial driver's license
(CDL)requirements in 49 CFR 383.23 for a maximum 2-year period if it finds “such exemption would likely achieve a level of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be achieved absent such exemption.” The procedures for requesting an exemption (including renewals) are prescribed in 49 CFR part 381. FMCSA evaluated Volvo's application for a renewal on its merits and decided to grant renewal of the exemption for eight of Volvo's engineers and technicians for a 2-year period. Volvo Application for an Exemption Renewal Volvo Trucks North America (Volvo) applied for the renewal of an exemption from the commercial driver's licensing rules, specifically 49 CFR 383.23, which establishes licensing requirements for drivers operating commercial motor vehicles
(CMVs)in interstate commerce. The exemption was originally granted on May 12, 2006 (71 FR 27780). Volvo is seeking a renewal of this exemption because the drivers it employs are citizens and residents of Sweden, and as such they cannot apply for a CDL from a State in the United States. A copy of the request for a renewal is in the docket identified at the beginning of this notice. The renewal of the exemption will enable the following drivers to operate CMVs in the U.S. and continue to support Volvo's field tests to meet future clean air standards, to test drive prototype vehicles at their test site, and to deliver the vehicles, if necessary. These are eight of the eleven drivers included in the original exemption: Christer Milding, Jonas Gustafsson, Sten-Ake Sandberg, Daniel Kanebratt, Urban Walter, Fredrik Wattwil, Jonas Nilsson, and Bjorn Nyman. These drivers are a team of designers, currently employed by Volvo in Sweden, who want to continue driving CMVs in the U.S. to test and evaluate prototype and production CMVs in order to design safe and well-tested vehicles for use on U.S. highways. They are experienced CMV operators with valid Swedish-issued CDLs. It is estimated that each driver would continue to drive approximately 2,500 miles per year on U.S. roads. Because each of the drivers was required to satisfy strict regulations in Sweden to obtain a CDL, and has extensive CMV training and experience, Volvo believes that the renewal of the exemption will continue to achieve a level of safety equivalent to the level of safety that would be obtained absent the exemption. Method To Ensure an Equivalent or Greater Level of Safety Drivers applying to obtain a Swedish CDL must take both a knowledge test and skills test before a license to operate CMVs is issued. This process is considered comparable to, or as effective as, the requirements of 49 CFR part 383 and adequately assesses the driver's ability to operate CMVs in the U.S. Request for Comments In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31315(b)(4) and 31136(e), FMCSA requests public comments on the renewal of Volvo's exemption from the requirements of 49 CFR 383.23. The Agency requests that interested parties with specific data concerning the safety records of the drivers listed in this notice submit comments by March 5, 2008. FMCSA will review all comments received by this date and determine whether the renewal of the exemption is consistent with the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 31315 and 31136(e). Comments received after the comment closing date will be filed in the public docket and will be considered to the extent practicable, but FMCSA may make its final decision at any time after the close of the comment period. FMCSA believes the requirements for a renewal of an exemption under 49 U.S.C. 31315 and 31136(e) can be satisfied by initially granting the renewal and then requesting and subsequently evaluating comments submitted by interested parties. As indicated above, the Agency previously published a notice of final disposition announcing its decision to exempt these eight Volvo drivers from the CDL requirement in 49 CFR 383.23. The decision to renew the exemption for these drivers was based on the merits of each driver's demonstrated knowledge and skills about the safe operation of CMVs, and only after careful consideration of the comments submitted in response to the February 9, 2006 original notice. The notice of application for exemption indicated that detailed information about the qualifications and experience of each of the drivers was provided in Volvo's application and that a copy of the application is in the docket referenced at the beginning of this notice. Interested parties or organizations possessing information that would otherwise show that any or all of these drivers are not currently achieving the requisite statutory level of safety should immediately notify FMCSA. The Agency will evaluate any adverse information submitted and, if safety is being compromised or if the continuation of the exemption is not consistent with 49 U.S.C. 31315(b)(4) and 31136(e), FMCSA will take immediate steps to revoke the exemption of the driver(s) in question. Issued on: January 28, 2008. Larry W. Minor, Associate Administrator for Policy and Program Development. [FR Doc. E8-1931 Filed 2-1-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Transit Administration [FTA Docket No. 2008-0007] Notice of Request for the Extension of Currently Approved Information Collections AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration, DOT. ACTION: Notice of request for comments. SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice announces the intention of the Federal Transit Administration
(FTA)to request the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)to extend the following currently approved information collection: Reporting of Technical Activities by FTA Grant Recipients. DATES: Comments must be submitted before April 4, 2008. ADDRESSES: To ensure that your comments are not entered more than once into the docket, submit comments identified by the docket number by only one of the following methods: 1. *Web site: http://www.regulations.gov.* Follow the instructions for submitting comments on the U.S. Government electronic docket site. ( **Note:** The U.S. Department of Transportation's (DOT's) electronic docket is no longer accepting electronic comments.) All electronic submissions must be made to the U.S. Government electronic docket site at *http://www.regulations.gov.* Commenters should follow the directions below for mailed and hand-delivered comments. 2. *Fax:* 202-493-2251. 3. *Mail:* U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Docket Operations, M-30, West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001. 4. *Hand Delivery:* U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Docket Operations, M-30, West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001 between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. *Instructions:* You must include the agency name and docket number for this notice at the beginning of your comments. Submit two copies of your comments if you submit them by mail. For confirmation that FTA has received your comments, include a self-addressed stamped postcard. Note that all comments received, including any personal information, will be posted and will be available to Internet users, without change, to *http://www.regulations.gov.* You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the **Federal Register** published April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477), or you may visit *http://www.regulations.gov.* *Docket:* For access to the docket to read background documents and comments received, go to *http://www.regulations.gov* at any time. Background documents and comments received may also be viewed at the U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Docket Operations, M-30, West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001 between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Candace Noonan, Office of Planning and Environment,
(202)366-1648, or e-mail: *CandaceNoonan@dot.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Interested parties are invited to send comments regarding any aspect of these information collections, including:
(1)The necessity and utility of the information collection for the proper performance of the functions of the FTA;
(2)the accuracy of the estimated burden;
(3)ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the collected information; and
(4)ways to minimize the collection burden without reducing the quality of the collected information. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information collection. *Title:* Reporting of Technical Activities by FTA Grant Recipients, ( *OMB Number: 2132-0549* ). *Background:* 49 U.S.C. 5305 authorizes the use of federal funds to assist metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs), states, and local public bodies in developing transportation plans and programs to serve future transportation needs of urbanized areas and nonurbanized areas throughout the nation. As part of this effort, MPOs and states are required to consider a wide range of goals and objectives and to analyze alternative transportation system management and investment strategies. These objectives are measured by definable activities such as planning certification reviews and other related activities. The information collected is used to report annually to Congress, the Secretary, and to the Federal Transit Administrator on how grantees are responding to national emphasis areas and congressional direction, and allows FTA to track grantees' use of federal planning funds. *Respondents:* FTA grant recipients. *Estimated Annual Burden on Respondents:* 3 hours for each of the 52 respondents. *Estimated Total Annual Burden:* 156 hours. *Frequency:* Annual. Issued: January 29, 2008. Ann M. Linnertz, Associate Administrator for Administration. [FR Doc. E8-1935 Filed 2-1-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-57-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration [Docket No. NHTSA-2008-0023] Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation (NHTSA). ACTION: Request for public comment on proposed collection of information. SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from the public, it must receive approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, before seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit public comment on proposed collections of information, including extensions and reinstatement of previously approved collections. This document describes one collection of information for which NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval concerning an extension of motorcycle helmet labeling (OMB control number 2127-0518). DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 4, 2008. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments to the docket number identified in the heading of this document by any of the following methods: • *Federal eRulemaking Portal:* Go to *http://www.regulations.gov.* Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. • *Mail:* Docket Management Facility, M-30, U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building, Ground Floor, Rm. W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. • *Hand Delivery or Courier:* West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. • *Fax:*
(202)493-2251. You may call the Docket Management Facility at 202-366-9826. Regardless of how you submit your comments, you should mention the docket number of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Complete copies of each request for collection of information may be obtained at no charge from Mr. Sean Doyle, NHTSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W43-414, NVS-111, Washington, DC 20590. Mr. Doyle's telephone number is
(202)493-0188. Please identify the relevant collection of information by referring to its OMB Control Number. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, before an agency submits a proposed collection of information to OMB for approval, it must first publish a document in the **Federal Register** providing a 60-day comment period and otherwise consult with members of the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of information. The OMB has promulgated regulations describing what must be included in such a document. Under OMB's regulation (at 5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must ask for public comment on the following:
(i)Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;
(ii)The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
(iii)How to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected;
(iv)How to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic submission of responses. In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA asks for public comments on the following proposed collections of information:
(1)*Title:* 49 CFR 571.218, Motorcycle Helmets (Labeling). *OMB Number:* 2127-0518. *Type of Request:* Extension of a currently approved collection. *Affected Public:* Motorcycle helmet manufacturers *Abstract:* The National Traffic Vehicle Safety statute at 49 U.S.C. subchapter II standards and compliance, sections 30111 and 30117, authorizes the issuance of Federal motor vehicle safety standards (FMVSS). The Secretary is authorized to issue, amend, and revoke such rules and regulations as he/she deems necessary. The Secretary is also authorized to require manufacturers to provide information to first purchasers of motor vehicles or motor vehicle equipment when the vehicle equipment is purchased, in the form of printed matter placed in the vehicle or attached to the motor vehicle or motor vehicle equipment. Using this authority, the agency issued the initial FMVSS No. 218, Motorcycle Helmets, in 1974. Motorcycle helmets are devices used to protect motorcyclists from head injury in motor vehicle accidents. FMVSS No. 218 S5.6 requires that each helmet shall be labeled permanently and legibly in a manner such that the label(s) can be read easily without removing padding or any other permanent part. *Estimated Total Annual Burden:* 5,000 hours. *Estimated Number of Respondents:* 45. *Instructions:* For detailed instructions on submitting comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the Public Participation heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. Note that all comments received will be posted without change to *http://www.regulations.gov* , including any personal information provided. *Comments are invited on:* Whether the proposed collections of information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Department, including whether the information will have practical utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Public Participation How Do I Prepare and Submit Comments? Your comments must be written and in English. To ensure that your comments are correctly filed in the Docket, please include the docket number of this document in your comments. Your comments must not be more than 15 pages long. 1 We established this limit to encourage you to write your primary comments in a concise fashion. However, you may attach necessary additional documents to your comments. There is no limit on the length of the attachments. 1 *See* 49 CFR 553.21. If you are submitting comments electronically as a PDF (Adobe) file, we ask that the documents submitted be scanned using Optical Character Recognition
(OCR)process, thus allowing the agency to search and copy certain portions of your submissions. 2 2 Optical character recognition
(OCR)is the process of converting an image of text, such as a scanned paper document or electronic fax file, into computer-editable text. Please note that pursuant to the Data Quality Act, in order for substantive data to be relied upon and used by the agency, it must meet the information quality standards set forth in the OMB and DOT Data Quality Act guidelines. Accordingly, we encourage you to consult the guidelines in preparing your comments. OMB's guidelines may be accessed at *http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg/reproducible.html* . DOT's guidelines may be accessed at *http://dmses.dot.gov/submit/DataQualityGuidelines.pdf* . How Can I Be Sure That My Comments Were Received? If you submit your comments by mail and wish Docket Management to notify you upon its receipt of your comments, enclose a self-addressed, stamped postcard in the envelope containing your comments. Upon receiving your comments, Docket Management will return the postcard by mail. How Do I Submit Confidential Business Information? If you wish to submit any information under a claim of confidentiality, you should submit three copies of your complete submission, including the information you claim to be confidential business information, to the Chief Counsel, NHTSA, at the address given above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT . When you send a comment containing information claimed to be confidential business information, you should include a cover letter setting forth the information specified in our confidential business information regulation. 3 3 *See* 49 CFR part 512. In addition, you should submit a copy, from which you have deleted the claimed confidential business information, to the Docket by one of the methods set forth above. Will the Agency Consider Late Comments? We will consider all comments received before the close of business on the comment closing date indicated above under DATES . To the extent possible, we will also consider comments received after that date. How Can I Read the Comments Submitted By Other People? You may read the materials placed in the docket for this document (e.g., the comments submitted in response to this document by other interested persons) at any time by going to *http://www.regulations.gov* . Follow the online instructions for accessing the dockets. You may also read the materials at the Docket Management Facility by going to the street address given above under ADDRESSES . The Docket Management Facility is open between 9 am and 5 pm Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506(c); delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.50. Issued on: January 29, 2008. Stephen R. Kratzke, Associate Administrator for Rulemaking. [FR Doc. E8-1938 Filed 2-1-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-59-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Reports, Forms and Recordkeeping Requirements; Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information Collection Request
(ICR)abstracted below has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)for review and comment. The ICR describes the nature of the information collections and their expected burden. The **Federal Register** Notice with a 60-day comment period was published on November 9, 2007 [72 FR 63650]. DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before March 5, 2008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anetris Campbell at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of Rulemaking (NVS-100), 202-366-0933. 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W45-331, Washington, DC 20590. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration *Title:* 49 CFR part 552, Petitions for Rulemaking, Defects, and Noncompliance Orders. *OMB Number:* 2127-0046. *Type of Request:* Extension of a currently approved collection. *Abstract:* 49 U.S.C. 30162 specifies that any “interested person may file a petition with the Secretary of Transportation requesting the Secretary to begin a proceeding” to prescribe a motor vehicle safety standard under 49 U.S.C. chapter 301, or to decide whether to issue an order under 49 U.S.C. 30118(b). 49 U.S.C. 30111 gives the Secretary authority to prescribe motor vehicle safety standards. 49 U.S.C. 30118(b) gives the Secretary authority to issue an order to a manufacturer to notify vehicle or equipment owners, purchasers, and dealers of the defect or noncompliance and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Section 30162 further specifies that all petitions filed under its authority shall set forth the facts, which it is claimed establish that an order is necessary and briefly describe the order the Secretary should issue. *Affected Public:* Business or other-for-profit. *Estimated Total Annual Burden:* 20. ADDRESSES: Send comments, within 30 days, to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725-17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attention NHTSA Desk Officer. *Comments are invited on:* Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Department, including whether the information will have practical utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. A Comment to OMB is most effective if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication. Issued on: January 29, 2008. Stephen R. Kratzke, Associate Administrator for Rulemaking. [FR Doc. E8-1939 Filed 2-1-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-59-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration [U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA-2007-0043] Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT. ACTION: Request for public comment on proposed collection of information. SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from the public, it must receive approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, before seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit public comment on proposed collections of information, including extensions and reinstatements of previously approved collections. This document describes one collection of information for which NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval. DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 4, 2008. ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to U.S. Department of Transportation Dockets, 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE., Washington, DC 20590. Docket No. NHTSA-2007-0043. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Keith Williams, Contracting Officer's Technical Representative, Highway Safety Specialist, Enforcement and Justice Services Division, NTI-122, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W44-231, Washington, DC 20590. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, before an agency submits a proposed collection of information to OMB for approval, it must publish a document in the **Federal Register** providing a 60-day comment period and otherwise consult with members of the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of information. The OMB has promulgated regulations describing what must be included in such a document. Under OMB's regulations (at 5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must ask for public comment on the following:
(i)Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;
(ii)The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
(iii)How to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(iv)How to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA asks public comment on the following proposed collection of information: Evaluation Surveys for Demonstration of Speed Management Programs (including Automated and Traditional Enforcement) *Type of Request* —New information collection requirement. *OMB Clearance Number* —None. *Form Number* —This collection of information uses no standard forms. *Requested Expiration Date of Approval* —3 years from date of approval. *Summary of the Collection of Information* —NHTSA proposes to conduct telephone surveys to evaluate an intervention designed to reduce speeding. Sample size will range from 200 to 400 per survey wave depending on the geographic area unit being surveyed (State, community) and the evaluation design for the intervention (e.g., number of analytic groups). Interview length will be approximately10 minutes. The surveys will collect information on attitudes, awareness knowledge, and behavior related to the speed management program intervention. Surveys will be administered in areas where NHTSA is conducting speed management enforcement demonstration projects and similar control sites. The surveys will follow a pre-post design where they are administered prior to the implementation of the intervention and after its conclusion. Interim survey waves may also be administered if the duration of the intervention permits. In conducting the proposed surveys, the interviewers will use computer-assisted telephone interviewing to reduce interview length and minimize recording errors. A Spanish Language translation and bilingual interviewers will be used to minimize language barriers in participation. The proposed surveys will be anonymous. Description of the Need for the Information and Proposed Use of the Information The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's (NHTSA) mission is to save lives, prevent injuries, and reduce healthcare and other economic costs associated with motor vehicle crashes. The agency's goal is to reduce the rate of fatalities from speeding-related crashes. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) was established to reduce the mounting number of deaths, injuries, and economic losses resulting from motor vehicle crashes on the Nation's highways. As part of this statutory mandate, NHTSA is authorized to conduct research as a foundation for the development of motor vehicle standards and traffic safety programs. NHTSA has periodically updated its knowledge and understanding of the public's attitudes and behaviors with respect to speeding. In 1998, NHTSA conducted a national survey (National Survey of Speeding and Other Unsafe Driving Actions: Volume III: Countermeasures, Final Report) which indicated 71% of the general public favored automated devices for speed enforcement, and 76% believed the use of automated devices reduced speeding-related accidents. This survey also showed females were 15% more likely to be in favor of using automated speed enforcement than males, as well as, reasons why the public liked or disliked automated speeding devices. Twenty percent (20%) liked automated speeding devices because photo evidence proved a violation and 19% liked it because it increased driver awareness and fewer law enforcement officers were needed for traffic enforcement. Twenty-six percent (26%) did not like automated speeding enforcement because it invaded privacy, was a violation of rights or was a governmental infringement. Four years later NHTSA sponsored another national survey (National Survey of Speeding and Unsafe Driving Attitudes and Behavior: 2002: Volume II.) that found 68% of the general public believed the use of automated speed enforcement was good for anyone driving at least 20 miles per hour more than the speed limit, and 78% favored automated enforcement in a school zone. Fifty-Six percent (56%) of the public favored photos being taken of the driver from a frontal view while 32% favored taking photos of the rear license plate only. Since these surveys were conducted years ago they cannot be used to evaluate new programs scheduled to be initiated in the next few years. Beginning in 2008, NHTSA intends to administer a demonstration project over a three-year period that will include two years where selected sites will incorporate both traditional law enforcement and use of automated enforcement of speeding in the demonstration area. The demonstration project will be accompanied by a Public Information and Education campaign about speeding and driving safety. Before and after this demonstration project, NHTSA will conduct telephone surveys in waves of up to 400 adult drivers living in the selected demonstration project areas, as well as, a comparison area. These surveys will measure the change in public attitude about speeding and driving behavior resulting from the enforcement and Public Information and Education campaigns. These surveys will collect the following type of information: Whether members of the general public support automated enforcement; if the support varies by the specific speed being traveled; where the speeding occurs, such as a school zone or other road type; whether there is a preference for photos to be taken of the driver versus the license plate of the vehicle; whether there are a differences by sex or age; the reasons for supporting or not supporting automated speed enforcement versus traditional law enforcement officer enforcement; whether members of the general public are aware of the public information campaign in their area about speeding; whether this public information campaign has caused them to change their opinions toward speeding or whether the public information campaign has affected their behavior by causing them to be more careful about observing speed limits or reducing the speed they drive; the overall effectiveness of the public information campaign; determining what is an appropriate balance between automated speed enforcement and traditional law enforcement officer enforcement; whether members of the general public believe automated speeding enforcement should be expanded, and the effectiveness of automated and traditional enforcement measures on reducing crashes, injuries and saving lives. These surveys will help NHTSA to evaluate a demonstration project on speed management using automated and traditional speed enforcement. The findings will be used to help focus the program and determine which activities achieve the greatest benefit. This information will then be used to develop new programs to decrease the likelihood of speeding, and to provide informational support to States, localities, and law enforcement agencies that will aid them in their efforts to reduce speeding crashes and injuries. This demonstration project could be a model for how jurisdictions can develop a self-sustaining and effective speed management program using both traditional and automated speed enforcement methods. A demonstration project incorporating rational speed limits, a public communications plan and rigorously enforced speed limits over a defined geographic area will assist jurisdictions in understanding how to gain higher compliance with speed limits and bring about a reduction in speeding-related crashes, injuries and deaths. Description of the Likely Respondents (Including Estimated Number and Proposed Frequency of Response to the Collection of Information) Under this proposed effort, NHTSA intends to conduct telephone surveys to collect data from up to 1,600 licensed drivers age 18 and older. Interviews will be conducted with persons at residential phone numbers selected through random digit dialing and located within the jurisdiction where the speed enforcement demonstration project is conducted, as well as control areas. Businesses will be ineligible for the sample and will not be interviewed. No more than one respondent will be selected per household. Each member of the sample will complete one interview. After each wave is completed and the data analyzed, the findings will be disseminated to the participating States for review. Estimate of the Total Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden Resulting From the Collection of Information NHTSA estimates the respondents in the sample will require an average of 10 minutes to complete the telephone interviews. Thus, the estimated reporting burden hours on the general public will be a maximum of 137 hours per year, for two years. The respondents will not incur any reporting cost from the information collection. The respondents also will not incur any record keeping burden or record keeping cost from the information collection. Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A). Marilena Amoni, Associate Administrator, Research and Program Development. [FR Doc. E8-2016 Filed 2-1-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-59-P DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Community Development Financial Institutions Fund Request for Public Comments, Community Development Financial Institutions Program AGENCY: Community Development Financial Institutions Fund, Department of the Treasury. SUMMARY: This document invites comments from the public on certain issues regarding, for purposes of the Community Development Financial Institutions
(CDFI)Program, the CDFI Fund's certification of entities as CDFIs, pursuant to the CDFI Program regulations set forth at 12 CFR 1805.201. All materials submitted will be available for public inspection and copying. DATES: Written comments should be received on or before March 5, 2008 to be assured of consideration. ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent by mail to: Certification and Training Manager, CDFI Fund, U.S. Department of the Treasury, 601 13th Street, NW., Suite 200 South, Washington, DC 20005; by e-mail to *cdfihelp@cdfi.treas.gov* ; or by facsimile at
(202)622-7754. This is not a toll free number. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Information regarding the CDFI Fund and its programs may be downloaded from the CDFI Fund's Web site at *http://www.cdfifund.gov* . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Community Development Banking and Financial Institutions Act of 1994 (12 U.S.C. 4701 *et seq.* ) authorizes the CDFI Fund to select and provide financial assistance and technical assistance to eligible applicants through the CDFI Program. Pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 4702(5)(a) and in accordance with regulations set forth at 12 CFR 1805.201, the CDFI Fund certifies eligible entities as CDFIs. The capitalized terms found in this notice are defined in the CDFI Program regulations found at 12 CFR part 1805. Through this notice, the CDFI Fund is seeking comments from the public regarding the CDFI Fund's certification of organizations as CDFIs. Commentators are encouraged to consider, at a minimum, the following issues:
(1)*Primary Mission Criteria:* To be certified as a CDFI, the entity must have a primary mission of community development (12 CFR 1805.201(b)(1)).
(a)Should the primary mission criteria differ by organization type? If so, how? (b)(i) Should the CDFI Fund consider the types of Financial Products offered by an entity as relevant to the primary mission criteria? Specifically, should the CDFI Fund review, as part of the certification process, evidence of the affordability of an entity's Financial Products to the intended customers?
(ii)How else might the CDFI Fund ensure that CDFI certification is not given to entities that engage in what are commonly called “predatory lending practices” or include so-called “predatory lending terms” in their lending products?
(iii)Should the CDFI Fund require entities to provide Financial Products at a cost that is at least comparable to market rates or at some minimum level of affordability to their Target Markets in order to satisfy the primary mission criteria? If yes, how should market rates or minimum levels of affordability be determined?
(2)*Financing Entity Criteria:* To be certified as a CDFI, an entity's predominant business activity must be the provision, in arms-length transactions, of Financial Products, Development Services, and/or other similar financing (12 CFR 1805.201(b)(2)). (a)(i) What minimum level of financing activity (i.e., number of transactions, dollar amount of transactions, years of operation, and/or financing) should the CDFI Fund consider to be acceptable to determine that an entity is a financing entity?
(ii)How might this minimum level differ among organization types? (b)(i) Is three
(3)months worth of financing capital a reasonable measure of an entity's ability to sustain its financing activities? Should the period of time be longer or shorter?
(ii)What other measure(s) should the CDFI Fund use to determine that an entity can sustain its financing activities?
(c)The CDFI Fund's definition of Financial Products includes Loans, Equity Investments, and similar financing activities (as determined by the CDFI Fund) including the purchase of loans originated by certified CDFIs and the provision of loan guarantees. Should the CDFI Fund expand this definition? If so, what other products should be included?
(3)*Target Market Criteria:* In order to be certified as a CDFI, an entity must serve a Target Market consisting of one or more Investment Areas and/or Targeted Populations (12 CFR 1805.201(b)(3)).
(a)Are the CDFI Fund's Target Market options (Investment Area, Low Income Target Population, and Other Targeted Population) clear? If not, how can the CDFI Fund make the options more clear?
(b)Should a certification applicant be required to demonstrate a track record of serving the requested Target Market? If so, what is an appropriate minimum time-frame to establish such a track record? Please provide reasons to support your response.
(c)Should the CDFI Fund allow different types of organizations to meet the Target Market requirement at different benchmarks (i.e., percentage of activities directed toward the Target Market could deviate from the required 60 percent level for certain types of organizations)? If so, what level of activity would be acceptable for specific organization types?
(c)Should certification applicants be required to have a physical presence in their Target Markets (i.e., a branch, an office, local partners)? If so, what is an acceptable minimum level of presence?
(4)*Accountability Criteria:* To be certified as a CDFI, an entity must maintain accountability to residents of its Target Market through representation on its governing board or otherwise (12 CFR 1805.201(b)(5)).
(i)How many governing and/or advisory board members representing a Target Market should the CDFI Fund require to determine that an entity is accountable to its Target Market?
(ii)How should the geographic size, population density of the Target Market, and/or board type (governing vs. advisory) factor into the number of representative board members necessary to demonstrate accountability to a Target Market?
(b)Should the CDFI Fund expand or restrict the ways that board members can be deemed to be representative of a Target Market?
(i)Should the CDFI Fund continue to allow certification applicants to demonstrate accountability to Target Markets through “other mechanisms” (i.e. annual meetings, surveys)?
(ii)If so, what additional types of mechanisms should be considered to demonstrate accountability?
(5)*Development Services Criteria:* To be certified as a CDFI, an entity must provide Development Services in conjunction with its Financial Products, either directly or through an Affiliate, or through contract with another provider (12 CFR 1805.201(b)(4)).
(a)What minimum level of Development Services should be expected of a CDFI (i.e. is one-on-one counseling enough or should training be more formal/standardized?)?
(b)Should the CDFI Fund require an entity to provide Development Services that are linked to each Financial Product that it offers?
(c)Should Development Services include broad efforts to increase financial education and literacy within an entity's Target Market?
(6)*Non-Governmental Entity Criteria:* To be certified as a CDFI, an entity cannot be an agency or instrumentality of the United States, or any State or political subdivision thereof. An entity that is created by, or that receives substantial assistance from, one or more government entities may be a CDFI provided it is not controlled by such entities and maintains independent decision-making power over its activities (12 CFR 1805.201(b)(6)).
(a)What minimal levels of government support for an entity's operations (e.g., funding and capitalization) or government involvement in an entity's lending or investment decisions (e.g., underwriting criteria or loan approval) should be considered acceptable for certification?
(b)Should governmental “operations support” and government “involvement in lending and investment decisions” be considered separately or should evidence of both be required in order to deem an entity as having failed to satisfy the non-governmental entity criteria?
(7)*CDFI Certification Application Process:*
(a)Should an electronic, web-based CDFI certification application process be implemented and, if so, should paper applications continue to be accepted?
(i)Should CDFI certification status extend for a fixed period of time before it expires? If so, is three
(3)years an appropriate duration?
(ii)Should CDFI certification be continued indefinitely if the certified CDFI does not request an award from the CDFI Fund?
(iii)Is there any policy justification to designate different certification periods for different types of organizations? If so, how long should certification periods be for specific types of organizations?
(c)What should be the primary components of a recertification process?
(8)*General:* What other changes could the CDFI Fund make to improve the CDFI certification process that has not been addressed in the preceding questions? Authority: 12 U.S.C. 4703, 4703 note, 4704, 4706, 4707, 4717; 12 CFR part 1805. Dated: January 28, 2008. Donna J. Gambrell, Director, Community Development Financial Institutions Fund. [FR Doc. E8-2008 Filed 2-1-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4810-70-P DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service [IA-62-91] Proposed Collection; Comment Request for Regulation Project AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. ACTION: Notice and request for comments. SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the IRS is soliciting comments concerning an existing final and temporary regulations, IA-62-91 (TD 8482), Capitalization and Inclusion in Inventory of Certain Costs (§§ 1.263A-2 and 1.263A-3). DATES: Written comments should be received on or before April 4, 2008 to be assured of consideration. ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Glenn P. Kirkland, Internal Revenue Service, room 6129, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or copies of the regulations should be directed to Carolyn N. Brown at Internal Revenue Service, room 6129, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224, or at
(202)622-6688, or through the internet at *(Carolyn.N.Brown@irs.gov)* . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: *Title:* Capitalization and Inclusion in Inventory of Certain Costs. *OMB Number:* 1545-0987. *Regulation Project Number:* IA-62-91. *Abstract:* The requirements are necessary to determine whether taxpayers comply with the cost allocation rules of Internal Revenue Code section 263A and with the requirements for changing their methods of accounting. The information will be used to verify taxpayers' changes in method of accounting. *Current Actions:* There is no change to this existing regulation. *Type of Review:* Extension of OMB approval. *Affected Public:* Business or other for-profit organizations and farms. *Estimated Number of Respondents:* 20,000. *Estimated Average Time per Respondent:* The estimated annual reporting and recordkeeping burden per respondent varies from 1 hour to 9 hours. *Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:* 100,000. The following paragraph applies to all the collections of information covered by this notice. *The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information covered by this notice:* An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103. *Request for Comments:* Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will become a matter of public record. Comments are invited on:
(a)Whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility;
(b)the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the collection of information;
(c)ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected;
(d)ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and
(e)estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information. Approved: January 25, 2008. Glenn P. Kirkland, IRS Reports Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. E8-2006 Filed 2-1-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4830-01-P DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service [REG-208156-91] Proposed Collection; Comment Request for Regulation Project AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. ACTION: Notice and request for comments. SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the IRS is soliciting comments concerning existing final regulations, REG-208156-91 (TD 8929), Accounting for Long-Term Contracts (§ 1.460-1). DATES: Written comments should be received on or before April 4, 2008 to be assured of consideration. ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Glenn P. Kirkland, Internal Revenue Service, room 6129, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or copies of the regulations should be directed to Carolyn N. Brown at Internal Revenue Service, room 6129, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224, or at
(202)622-6688, or through the internet at ( *Carolyn.N.Brown@irs.gov* ). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: *Title:* Accounting for Long-Term Contracts. *OMB Number:* 1545-1650. *Regulation Project Number:* REG-208156-91. *Abstract:* The regulation requires the Commissioner to be notified of a taxpayer's decision to sever or aggregate one or more long-term contracts under the regulations. The statement is needed so the Commissioner can determine whether the taxpayer properly severed or aggregated its contract(s). The regulations affect any taxpayer that manufactures or constructs property under long-term contracts. *Current Actions:* There are no changes to these existing regulations. *Type of Review:* Extension of a currently approved collection. *Affected Public:* Business or other for-profit organizations. *Estimated Number of Respondents:* 50,000. *Estimated Time per Respondent:* 15 minutes. *Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:* 12,500. *The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information covered by this notice:* An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103. *Request for Comments:* Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will become a matter of public record. Comments are invited on:
(a)Whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility;
(b)the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the collection of information;
(c)ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected;
(d)ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and
(e)estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information. Approved: January 25, 2008. Glenn P. Kirkland, IRS Reports Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. E8-2009 Filed 2-1-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4830-01-P DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service Proposed Collection; Comment Request for Form 1028 AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. ACTION: Notice and request for comments. SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the IRS is soliciting comments concerning Form 1028, Application for Recognition of Exemption Under Section 521 of the Internal Revenue Code. DATES: Written comments should be received on or before April 4, 2008 to be assured of consideration. ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Glenn P. Kirkland, Internal Revenue Service, room 6129, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or copies of the form and instructions should be directed to R. Joseph Durbala at the Internal Revenue Service, room 6129, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224, or at
(202)622-3634, or through the internet at *RJoseph.Durbala@irs.gov* . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: *Title:* Application for Recognition of Exemption Under Section 521 of the Internal Revenue Code. *OMB Number:* 1545-0058. *Form Number:* 1028. *Abstract:* Farmers' cooperatives must file Form 1028 to apply for exemption from Federal income tax as being organizations described in Internal Revenue Code section 521. The information on Form 1028 provides the basis for determining whether the applicants are exempt. *Current Actions:* There are no changes being made to the form at this time. *Type of Review:* Extension of a currently approved collection. *Affected Public:* Business or other for-profit organizations. *Estimated Number of Respondents:* 50. *Estimated Time per Respondent:* 50 hours, 54 minutes. *Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:* 2,545. *The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information covered by this notice:* An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103. *Request for Comments:* Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will become a matter of public record. Comments are invited on:
(a)Whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility;
(b)the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the collection of information;
(c)ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected;
(d)ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and
(e)estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information. Approved: January 25, 2008. Glenn P. Kirkland, IRS Reports Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. E8-2012 Filed 2-1-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4830-01-P DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service [TD 9328] Proposed Collection; Comment Request for Regulation Project AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. ACTION: Notice and request for comments. SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the IRS is soliciting comments concerning an existing final regulation, TD 9328, Safe Harbor for Valuation Under Section 475. DATES: Written comments should be received on or before April 4, 2008, to be assured of consideration. ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Glenn P. Kirkland, Internal Revenue Service, Room 6129, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20224. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or copies of the regulations should be directed to R. Joseph Durbala, at Internal Revenue Service, Room 6129, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20224, or at
(202)622-3634, or through the Internet at *RJoseph.Durbala@irs.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: *Title:* Safe Harbor for Valuation Under Section 475. *OMB Number:* 1545-1945. *Regulation Project Number:* TD 9328. *Abstract:* This document sets forth an elective safe harbor that permits dealers in securities and dealers in commodities to elect to use the values of positions reported on certain financial statements as the fair market values of those positions for purposes of section 475 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). This safe harbor is intended to reduce the compliance burden on taxpayers and to improve the administrability of the valuation requirement of section 475 for the IRS. *Current Actions:* There is no change to this existing regulation. *Type of Review:* Extension of currently approved collection. *Affected Public:* Business or other for-profit organizations. *Estimated Number of Respondents:* 12,308. *Estimated Average Time per Respondent:* 4 hours. *Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:* 49,232. The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information covered by this notice: An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103. *Request for Comments:* Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will become a matter of public record. Comments are invited on:
(a)Whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility;
(b)the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the collection of information;
(c)ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected;
(d)ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and
(e)estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information. Approved: January 24, 2008. Glenn P. Kirkland, IRS Reports Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. E8-2017 Filed 2-1-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4830-01-P DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service Proposed Collection; Comment Request for Form CT-1 AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. ACTION: Notice and request for comments. SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the IRS is soliciting comments concerning Form CT-1, Employer's Annual Railroad Retirement Tax Return. DATES: Written comments should be received on or before April 4, 2008, to be assured of consideration. ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Glenn P. Kirkland, Internal Revenue Service, Room 6129, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or copies of the form and instructions should be directed to R. Joseph Durbala,
(202)622-3634, Internal Revenue Service, room 6129, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224, or through the Internet at *RJoseph.Durbala@irs.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: *Title:* Employer's Annual Railroad Retirement Tax Return. *OMB Number:* 1545-0001. *Form Number:* Form CT-1. *Abstract:* Railroad employers are required to file an annual return to report employer and employee Railroad Retirement Tax Act
(RRTA)taxes. Form CT-1 is used for this purpose. The IRS uses the information to insure that the employer has paid the correct tax. *Current Actions:* There are no changes being made to the form at this time. *Type of Review:* Extension of a currently approved collection. *Affected Public:* Businesses or other for-profit organizations, not-for-profit institutions, and state, local or tribal governments. *Estimated Number of Respondents:* 2,817. *Estimated Time per Respondent:* 21 hours, 19 minutes. *Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:* 46,359. The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information covered by this notice: An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103. *Request for Comments:* Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will become a matter of public record. Comments are invited on:
(a)Whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility;
(b)the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the collection of information;
(c)ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected;
(d)ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and
(e)estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information. Approved: January 25, 2008. Glenn P. Kirkland, IRS Reports Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. E8-2018 Filed 2-1-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4830-01-P DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service [LR-218-78] Proposed Collection; Comment Request for Regulation Project AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. ACTION: Notice and request for comments. SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the IRS is soliciting comments concerning an existing final regulation, LR-218-78 (TD 8096), Product Liability Losses and Accumulations for Product Liability Losses (Section 1.172-13). DATES: Written comments should be received on or before April 4, 2008, to be assured of consideration. ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Glenn P. Kirkland, Internal Revenue Service, Room 6129, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or copies of the regulations should be directed to R. Joseph Durbala, at Internal Revenue Service, Room 6129, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224, or at
(202)622-3634, or through the Internet at *RJoseph.Durbala@irs.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: *Title:* Product Liability Losses and Accumulations for Product Liability Losses. *OMB Number:* 1545-0863. Regulation Project Number: LR-218-78 (TD 8096). *Abstract:* Generally, a taxpayer who sustains a product liability loss must carry the loss back 10 years. However, a taxpayer may elect to have such loss treated as a regular net operating loss under section 172. The election is made by attaching a statement to the tax return. This statement will enable the IRS to monitor compliance with the statutory requirements. *Current Actions:* There is no change to this existing regulation. *Type of Review:* Extension of currently approved collection. *Affected Public:* Business or other for-profit organizations. *Estimated Number of Respondents:* 5,000. *Estimated Average Time per Respondent:* 30 minutes. *Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:* 2,500. The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information covered by this notice: An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103. *Request for Comments:* Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will become a matter of public record. Comments are invited on:
(a)Whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility;
(b)the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the collection of information;
(c)ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected;
(d)ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and
(e)estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information. Approved: January 24, 2008. Glenn P. Kirkland, IRS Reports Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. E8-2019 Filed 2-1-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4830-01-P DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service Proposed Collection; Comment Request for Revenue Procedure 2001-21 AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. ACTION: Notice and request for comments. SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the IRS is soliciting comments concerning Revenue Procedure 2001-21, Debt Roll-Ups. DATES: Written comments should be received on or before April 4, 2008, to be assured of consideration. ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Glenn P. Kirkland, Internal Revenue Service, Room 6129, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or copies of the regulations should be directed to R. Joseph Durbala at Internal Revenue Service, Room 6129, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224, or at
(202)622-3634, or through the internet at *RJoseph.Durbala@irs.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: *Title:* Debt Roll-Ups. *OMB Number:* 1545-1647. *Revenue Procedure Number:* Revenue Procedure 2001-21. *Abstract:* Revenue Procedure 2001-21 provides for an election that will facilitate the consolidation of two or more outstanding debt instruments into a single debt instrument. Under the election, taxpayers can treat certain exchanges of debt instruments as realization events for federal income tax purposes even though the exchanges do not result in significant medications under section 1.1001-3 of the Income Tax Regulations. *Current Actions:* There are no changes to the paperwork burden relating to this revenue procedure at this time. *Type of Review:* Extension of a currently approved collection. *Affected Public:* Business or other for-profit organizations. *Estimated Number of Respondents:* 100. *Estimated Time per Respondent:* 45 minutes. *Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:* 75. The burden for the collection of information is reflected in the burden of Form 4868, Application for Automatic Extension of Time to File U.S. Individual Tax Return. The following paragraph applies to all the collections of information covered by this notice: An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103. *Request for Comments:* Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will become a matter of public record. Comments are invited on:
(a)Whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility;
(b)the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the collection of information;
(c)ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected;
(d)ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and
(e)estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information. Approved: January 24, 2008. Glenn P. Kirkland, IRS Reports Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. E8-2021 Filed 2-1-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4830-01-P DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service Proposed Collection; Comment Request for Form 5713 and Schedules A, B, and C (Form 5713) AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. ACTION: Notice and request for comments. SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the IRS is soliciting comments concerning Form 5713, Specifically Attributable Taxes and Income (Section 999(c)(2)), and the attached Schedules A, B, and C (Form 5713). DATES: Written comments should be received on or before April 4, 2008, to be assured of consideration. ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Glenn P. Kirkland, Internal Revenue Service, Room 6129, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or copies of the form and instructions should be directed to R. Joseph Durbala at Internal Revenue Service, Room 6129, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224, or at
(202)622-3634, or through the internet at *RJoseph.Durbala@irs.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: *Title:* International Boycott Report. *OMB Number:* 1545-0216. *Form Number:* 5713, and Schedules A, B, and C (Form 5713). *Abstract:* Form 5713 and related Schedules A, B, and C are used by any entity that has operations in a “boycotting” country. If that entity cooperates with or participates in an international boycott, it may lose a portion of the following benefits: the foreign tax credit, deferral of income of a controlled foreign corporation, deferral of income of a domestic international sales corporation, or deferral of income of a foreign sales corporation. The IRS uses Form 5713 to determine if any of these benefits should be lost. The information is also used as the basis for a report to the Congress. *Current Actions:* There are no changes being made to the form at this time. *Type of Review:* Extension of a currently approved collection. *Affected Public:* Business or other for-profit organizations, and individuals. *Estimated Number of Respondents:* 3,875. *Estimated Time per Respondent:* 26 hours, 54 minutes. *Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:* 104,236. The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information covered by this notice: An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103. *Request for Comments:* Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will become a matter of public record. Comments are invited on:
(a)Whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility;
(b)the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the collection of information;
(c)ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected;
(d)ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and
(e)estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information. Approved: January 25, 2008. Glenn Kirkland, IRS Reports Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. E8-2022 Filed 2-1-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4830-01-P DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service Open Meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (including the States of Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas, and the Territory of Puerto Rico) AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. ACTION: Correction to notice of meeting. SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, February 28, 2008, 1 to 5 p.m., Friday, February 29, 2008, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., and Saturday, March 1, 2008, 8 a.m. to Noon Eastern Time. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sallie Chavez at 1-888-912-1227, or
(954)423-7979. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App.
(1988)that a meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Thursday, February 28, 2008, 1 to 5 p.m., Friday, February 29, 2008, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., and Saturday, March 1, 2008, 8 a.m. to Noon Eastern Time, at the Holiday Inn—International Drive Resort, 6515 International Drive, Orlando, Florida. You can submit written comments to the panel by faxing the comments to
(954)423-7975, or by mail to Taxpayer Advocacy Panel, Room 340, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Plantation, FL 33324, or you can contact us at *http://www.improveirs.org.* This meeting is not required to be open to the public, but because we are always interested in community input we will accept public comments. Please contact Sallie Chavez at 1-888-912-1227 or
(954)423-7979 for more information. The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues. Dated: January 23, 2008. Richard Morris, Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel. [FR Doc. E8-2014 Filed 2-1-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4830-01-P 73 23 Monday, February 4, 2008 Presidential Documents Part II The President Presidential Determination No. 2008-8 of January 22, 2008—Determination on the Proposed Agreement for Cooperation Between the United States of America and the Republic of Turkey Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy Presidential Determination No. 2008-10 of January 29, 2008—Unexpected Urgent Refugee and Migration Needs Related to Africa and the Middle East Title 3— The President Presidential Determination No. 2008-8 of January 22, 2008 Determination on the Proposed Agreement for Cooperation Between the United States of America and the Republic of Turkey Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the Secretary of Energy I have considered the proposed Agreement for Cooperation Between the United States of America and the Republic of Turkey Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy, signed at Ankara on July 26, 2000, along with the views, recommendations, and statements of interested agencies. I approve the proposed Agreement and have determined the performance of the Agreement will promote, and will not constitute an unreasonable risk to, the common defense and security. The Secretary of State is authorized to publish this determination in the **Federal Register** . GWBOLD.EPS THE WHITE HOUSE, Washington, January 22, 2008. [FR Doc. 08-494 Filed 2-1-08; 8:58 am]
Connectionstraces to 14
Traces to 14 documents
U.S. Code
- HOV facilities§ 166
- Rules, regulations, and recommendations§ 315
- Waivers, exemptions, and pilot programs§ 31315
- Planning programs§ 5305
- Federal agency responsibilities§ 3506
- Purposes§ 3501
- Petitions by interested persons for standards and enforcement§ 30162
- Notification of defects and noncompliance§ 30118
- Standards§ 30111
- Findings and purposes§ 4701
- Definitions§ 4702
- Establishment of national Fund for community development banking§ 4703
- Confidentiality and disclosure of returns and return information§ 6103
17 references not yet in our index
- Pub. L. 109-59
- 49 CFR 1.48
- 49 CFR 383.23
- 49 CFR 381
- 49 CFR 383
- 5 CFR 1320.8(d)
- 49 CFR 571.218
- 49 CFR 553.21
- 49 CFR 512
- 49 CFR 1.50
- 49 CFR 552
- 12 CFR 1805
- Pub. L. 104-13
- T.D. 8482
- T.D. 8929
- T.D. 9328
- T.D. 8096
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice; request for applications
Pub. L.Pub. L. 109-59
Cite49 CFR 1.48
Cite49 CFR 383.23
Cites 31 · showing 12Cited by 0 across 0 sources