Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2005-12-14 · Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior · Notices

Notices. Notice

2,289 words·~10 min read·/register/2005/12/14/05-24037

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4410-10-M DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish And Wildlife Service Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Initiation of a 5-Year Review of Greenback Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhynchus clarki stomias) AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) announces a 5-year review of greenback cutthroat trout ( *Oncorhynchus clarki stomias* ) under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA). A 5-year review is a periodic process conducted to ensure that the listing classification of a species is accurate.
A 5-year review is based on the best scientific and commercial data available at the time of the review; therefore, we are requesting submission of any such information on greenback cutthroat trout that has become available since its reclassification as a threatened species in 1978. Based on the results of this 5-year review, we will make the requisite finding under the ESA. DATES: To allow us adequate time to conduct this review, we must receive your information no later than February 13, 2006.
However, we will continue to accept new information about any listed species at any time. ADDRESSES: Submit information to Susan Linner, Field Supervisor, Colorado Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 755 Parfet Street, Suite 361, Lakewood, Colorado 80215. Information received in response to this notice and review, as well as other documentation in our files, will be available for public inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours, at the above address. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Linner, Field Supervisor, at the above address, or at 303-275-2370. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), the Service maintains a list of endangered and threatened wildlife and plant species at 50 CFR 17.11 (for animals) and 17.12 (for plants). Section 4(c)(2)(A) of the ESA requires that we conduct a review of listed species at least once every 5 years. Based on such reviews, under section 4(c)(2)(B), we then determine whether or not any species should be removed from the List (delisted), or reclassified from endangered to threatened or from threatened to endangered.
Delisting a species must be supported by the best scientific and commercial data available and is only considered if these data substantiate that the species is neither endangered nor threatened for one or more of the following reasons—(1) The species is considered extinct;
(2)the species is considered to be recovered; and/or
(3)the original data available when the species was listed, or the interpretation of such data, were in error. Any change in Federal classification would require a separate rulemaking process. The regulations in 50 CFR 424.21 require that we publish a notice in the **Federal Register** announcing those species currently under active review. This notice announces our active review of the greenback cutthroat trout currently listed as threatened. We request submission of any new information on the greenback cutthroat trout that has become available since since its reclassification as a threatened species in 1978 (43 FR 16343, April 18, 1978). Public Solicitation of New Information To ensure that the 5-year review is complete and based on the best available scientific and commercial information, we are soliciting new information from the public, concerned governmental agencies, tribes, the scientific community, industry, environmental entities, and any other interested parties concerning the status of the greenback cutthroat trout. The 5-year review considers the best scientific and commercial data and all new information that has become available since the listing determination. Categories of requested information include—(A) species biology, including but not limited to, population trends, distribution, abundance, demographics, and genetics;
(B)habitat conditions, including but not limited to amount, distribution, and suitability;
(C)conservation measures that have been implemented that benefit the species;
(D)threat status and trends; and
(E)other new information, data, or corrections, including but not limited to taxonomic or nomenclatural changes, identification of erroneous information contained in the List, and improved analytical methods. If you wish to provide information for this 5-year review, you may submit your comments and materials to the Colorado Field Office Supervisor (see ADDRESSES ). Our practice is to make comments, including names and home addresses of respondents, available for public review during regular business hours. Respondents may request that we withhold a respondent's identity, as allowable by law. If you wish us to withhold your name or address, you must state this request prominently at the beginning of your comment. However, we will not consider anonymous comments. To the extent consistent with applicable law, we will make all submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses, available for public inspection in their entirety. Comments and materials received will be available for public inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours (see ADDRESSES ). Authority: This document is published under the authority of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Dated: November 16, 2005. Richard A. Coleman, Regional Director, Denver, Colorado. [FR Doc. E5-7283 Filed 12-13-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-55-P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service National Register of Historic Places; Notification of Pending Nominations and Related Actions Nominations for the following properties being considered for listing or related actions in the National Register were received by the National Park Service before December 3, 2005. Pursuant to section 60.13 of 36 CFR Part 60 written comments concerning the significance of these properties under the National Register criteria for evaluation may be forwarded by United States Postal Service, to the National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C St., NW., 2280, Washington, DC 20240; by all other carriers, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service,1201 Eye St., NW., 8th floor, Washington DC 20005; or by fax, 202-371-6447. Written or faxed comments should be submitted by December 29, 2005. John W. Roberts, Acting Chief, National Register/National Historic Landmarks Program. Arizona Maricopa County First Methodist Episcopal Church of Glendale Sanctuary, 7102 N. 58th Dr., Glendale, 05001502 Floralcroft Historic District, Roughly bounded by State St., 59th Ave., Myrtle St., Grand Ave. and 61st Ave., Glendale, 05001505 Glendale Grammar School One-room Class Building, 7301 N. 58th Dr., Glendale, 05001503 Glendale Tract Historic District, 51st Ave. and Northern Ave., Glendale, 05001506 Tinker, C.H., House, 6838 N. 59th Dr., Glendale, 05001504 Colorado Delta County First Presbyterian Church of Eckert, 13011 and 13025 CO 65, Eckert, 05001507 Iowa Montgomery County Red Oak Firehouse and City Jail, 318 E. Washington Ave., Red Oak, 05001508 Kansas Chautauqua County Niotaze Methodist Episcopal Church, 301 N. F St., Niotaze, 05001512 Dickinson County Abilene Historic District #1, 301, 303, 305, 307, 309 N. Buckeye, Abilene, 05001514 Leavenworth County First Presbyterian Church, Leavenworth, 407 Walnut St., Leavenworth, 05001515 Lincoln County Nielsen Farm, 1125 E. Pike Dr., Sylvan Grove, 05001513 Shawnee County Veale, Tinkham, Building, 909-911 S. Kansas Ave., Topeka, 05001511 Massachusetts Suffolk County Stony Brook Reservation Parkways, Metropolitan Park System of Great Boston MPS, (Metropolitan Park System of Greater Boston MPS) Dedham, Enneking, Turtle Pond Parkways, Smith Field, Reservation, W. Border Rds., Boston, 05001509 Worcester County West Main Street Historic District (Boundary Increase II), Roughly bounded by Charles, Forbes, South and Cross Sts., Westborough, 05001516 North Dakota Walsh County Odalen Lutherske Kirke, 6 mi W and 1/4 mi N of Jct of ND 32 and Cty Rte 9, Edinburg, 05001517 Ohio Clinton County Underwood Farms Rural Historic District, Vicinity of OH 73 and Brimstone Rd., Chester Township, 05001519 Columbiana County McBean, Daniel, Farmstead, 18709 Fife Coal Rd., Wellsville, 05001518 Oregon Marion County Union Street Railroad Bridge and Trestle, Jct of Union St. NE and Water St. NE, Salem, 05001520 Vermont Orange County Camp Billings, (Organized Summer Camping in Vermont MPS) 1452 VT 244, Thetford, 05001524 Washington County Bridge No. 27, Town Hwy 61, Lover's Ln., Berlin, 05001523 Windsor County Spaulding Bridge, Mill St., Cavenish, 05001522 Virginia Culpeper County Fairview Cemetery, VA 522, approx. 1/4 mi. W of Main St., Culpeper, 05001521 In the interest of preservation of the resource the comment period for the following resource has been shortened to three
(3)days: Michigan Gratiot County Ithaca Downtown Historic District, 100-168 and 101-161 E. Center St., Ithaca, 05001510 [FR Doc. E5-7282 Filed 12-13-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312-51-P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Reclamation Safety Modifications and Flood Damage Reduction Project for Folsom Dam and Appurtenant Structures (Combined Federal Effort)—Sacramento, El Dorado, and Placer Counties, CA AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior. ACTION: Notice of additional public scoping meeting. SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)and Public Resources Code, sections 21000-21177 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), the lead Federal agency; the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, a cooperating Federal agency; and the California Reclamation Board/Department of Water Resources, the lead State agencies; intend to prepare a joint Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIS/EIR) for the Safety Modifications and Flood Damage Reduction Project for Folsom Dam and Appurtenant Structures (Combined Federal Effort). The notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement
(EIS)and notice of public scoping meetings was published in the **Federal Register** on October 6, 2005 (70 FR 58469). A notice of change to public scoping meeting dates and locations was published in the **Federal Register** on December 2, 2005 (70 FR 72314). Reclamation will have an additional scoping meeting on December 15, 2005. DATES: The additional meeting will be on December 15, 2005, from 5 to 7 p.m. in Sacramento, CA. ADDRESSES: The added location is County Administration Center, Board Chamber Foyer, 700 H Street, Sacramento, CA. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Shawn Oliver, Bureau of Reclamation, 7794 Folsom Dam Road, Folsom, California 95630; telephone number
(916)989-7256; e-mail *soliver@mp.usbr.gov.* Dated: December 2, 2005. Frank Michny, Regional Environmental Officer, Mid-Pacific Region. [FR Doc. E5-7294 Filed 12-13-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-MN-P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act Notice is hereby given that on November 22, 2005, a proposed Consent Decree (“Consent Decree”) in *United States* v. *Summit Equipment & Supplies, Inc., et al.,* Civil Action No. 5:90CV1704, was lodged with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. In this action, the United States sought to recover response costs incurred by the United States at or in connection with the Summit Equipment & Supplies, Inc. Superfund Site (the “Site”) in Akron, Ohio, against alleged generators of hazardous waste disposed of at the Site, pursuant to Sections 107 and 113 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9607, 9613. The United States sought to recover response costs incurred at or in connection with the Site on behalf of the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the United States Defense Logistics Agency (“DLA”), an agency within the United States Department of Defense. Since July 1991, DLA has been performing the response action at the Site pursuant to an Administrative Order by Consent (“AOC”) with EPA under sections 104 and 106 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9604 and 9606. The Consent Decree would resolve the United States' claims for past and future response costs with regard to the Site against Settling Defendants through a reimbursement to the Superfund of a portion of the response costs incurred or to be incurred by the United States at or in connection with the Site. Settling Defendants would collectively pay a total of $1.36 million in reimbursement for response costs that EPA has incurred at or in connection with the Site. (Each Settling Defendant's individual payment is listed in Appendix A to the Consent Decree). As a condition of settlement, Settling Defendants would relinquish all claims or causes of action with respect to the Site against the United States, including DLA, and would waive all affirmative CERCLA claims or causes of action that they may have against any person. In return, the Settling Defendants would receive contribution protection and a covenant not to sue from the United States for the work at the Site as well as past and future response costs, subject to certain reservations of rights. DLA would pay $1.48 million in reimbursement for past response costs incurred by EPA, its remaining obligations under the AOC would terminate, and EPA would assume responsibility for completing the remaining clean up of the Site. DLA also would receive contribution protection. The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty
(30)days from the date of this publication comments relating to the Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611, and should refer to *United States* v. *Summit Equipment & Supplies, Inc., et al.,* Civil Action No. 5:90CV1704, D.J. Ref. 90-11-3-633 and 90-11-3-633/2. The Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the United States Attorney, 801 West Superior Avenue, Suite 400, Cleveland, Ohio 44113-1852, and at U.S. EPA Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 14th Floor, Chicago, Illinois. During the public comment period, the Consent Decree, may also be examined on the following Department of Justice Web site, *http://www/usdoj.gov/enrd/open.html* . A copy of the Consent Decree may also be obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611 for by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia Fleetwood ( *tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov* ), fax no.
(202)514-0097, phone confirmation number
(202)514-1547. In requesting a copy from the Consent Decree Library, please enclose a check in the amount of $12.75 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the U.S. Treasury. William D. Brighton, Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division. [FR Doc. 05-24037 Filed 12-13-05; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 3
3 references not yet in our index
  • 50 CFR 17.11
  • 50 CFR 424.21
  • 36 CFR 60
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice
Cite50 CFR 17.11
Cite50 CFR 424.21
Cite36 CFR 60
Cites 6Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.