Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2005-11-16 · DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE · Notices

Notices. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

458 words·~2 min read·/register/2005/11/16/05-22664

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4410-05-P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Proposed Termination of Final Decree Notice is hereby given that Ludowici Roof Tile, Inc. (“Ludowici”), successor in interest to Ludowici-Celadon Company (“Ludowici-Celadon”), a defendant in *Unitd States* v. *Ludowici-Celadon Co., et al.,* In Equity No. 9022 (N.D. III. Mar. 12, 1929), has filed a motion to terminate the final Decree entered in that matter on March 18, 1929 (the “Decree”). The Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, in a Stipulation also filed with the Court, tentatively has consented to termination of the Decree, but has reserved the right to withdraw its consent pending receipt of public comments.
On March 12, 1929, the United States filed a Petition against Ludowici-Celadon and sixteen individuals, including certain exclusive sales agents, “preferred roofers,” and certain Ludowici-Celadon officers, directors, and employees. The Petition alleged that the defendants conspired to restrain interstate trade and commerce in the manufacture and sale of “roofing tile” and to monopolize and attempt to monopolize such trade. The Decree defined “roofing tile” as “tile produced from shale or clay and used as a covering for pitched roofs, cornices and other exposed surfaces of buildings and structures.
” The Decree perpetually enjoined the defendants from continuing the conspiracy or entering into any combination similar thereto. The Decree prohibited the defendants from engaging in any exclusionary or otherwise potentially or patently anticompetitive conduct. The Decree also perpetually enjoined Ludowici-Celadon from acquiring ownership or control of any additional plants engaged in the manufacture and sale of roofing tile. The Department has filed with the Court a memorandum setting forth the reasons the United States believes that termination of the Decree would serve the public interest.
Copies of the motion papers, the Stipulation containing the United States' tentative consent, the United States' memorandum, and all other papers filed with the Court in connection with the motion will be available for inspection at the Antitrust Documents Group, Antitrust Division, Room 215, 325 7th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20530, and at the Office of the Clerk of the United States District court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. Copies of these materials may be obtained from the Antitrust Division upon request and payment of the copying fees set by Department of Justice regulations.
Interested persons may submit comments regarding the proposed termination of the Decree to the United States. Such comments must be received by the Antitrust Division within sixty days and will be filed with the Court by the United States. Comments should be addressed to Maribeth Petrizzi, Chief, Litigation II Section, Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice, 1401 H Street, NW., Suite 3000, Washington, DC 20530 (202-307-0924). Dorothy B. Fountain, Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 05-22664 Filed 11-15-05; 8:45 am]
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.