Notices. Notice

7,628 words·~35 min read·/register/2005/07/14/05-13851

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4510-43-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-56,586] Lawson-Hemphill Sales, Inc., Spartanburg, SC; Notice of Negative Determination on Reconsideration On April 6, 2005, the Department issued an Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for the workers and former workers of the subject facility. The notice of determination was published on April 25, 2005 in the **Federal Register** (70 FR 21250). Workers at the subject facility sell textile testing instruments.

On January 24, 2005, a company official filed the petition as a secondarily-affected company (affected by loss of business as a supplier, assembler, or finisher of products or components produced for a TAA certified firm). The Department denied Trade Adjustment Assistance

(TAA)and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

(ATAA)to workers and former workers of Lawson-Hemphill Sales, Inc., Spartanburg, South Carolina because the worker separation eligibility requirement of Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, was not met. The investigation revealed that the subject facility neither separated nor threatened to separate a significant number or proportion of workers at the subject facility during the relevant period (January-December 2004). In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner alleged that the subject facility supported an affiliated production facility, Lawson-Hemphill, Inc., Central Falls, Rhode Island. A careful review of previously-submitted documents revealed that a significant number of the workers at the South Carolina facility were separated or threatened with separation during the relevant period and that the primary function of the South Carolina facility is to sell textile testing instruments produced at the Rhode Island facility. Even if the subject worker group supported production at the Rhode Island facility, they could not be certified for TAA under this petition because the Rhode Island facility was not affected by loss of business as a supplier, assembler, or finisher of products or components produced for the TAA-certified firms identified in the petition: Globe Manufacturing, Fall River, Massachusetts (TA-W-38,840); Cavalier Specialty Yarn, Gastonia, North Carolina (TA-W-53,226); Cone Mills Corporation, Cliffside, North Carolina (TA-W-53,291A); Pillowtex Corporation, Kannapolis, North Carolina (TA-W-39,416); Burlington Industries, Greensboro, North Carolina (TA-W-40,205); and Spartan Mills, Spartanburg, South Carolina (TA-W-37,126). Lawson-Hemphill, Inc. cannot be considered a secondarily-affected company because textile testing instruments is not a component of textiles and the company neither assembles nor finishes an article produced by the above-identified companies. Since the workers are denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA. Conclusion After careful reconsideration, I affirm the original notice of negative determination of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance for workers and former workers of Lawson-Hemphill Sales, Inc., Spartanburg, South Carolina. Signed at Washington, DC, this 30th day of June, 2005. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5-3738 Filed 7-13-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [[TA-W-56,782] FC Meyer Packaging, LLC/Millen Industries, Inc.; Lawrence, MA; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration By application of May 20, 2005, a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative determination regarding eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA), applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The denial notice was signed on May 6, 2005, and published in the **Federal Register** on May 25, 2005 (70 FR 30145). Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under the following circumstances:

(1)If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered that the determination complained of was erroneous;

(2)If it appears that the determination complained of was based on a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or

(3)If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a mis-interpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the decision. The petition for the workers of FC Meyer Packaging, LLC/Millen Industries, Inc., Lawrence, Massachusetts engaged in production of shoe boxes was denied because the “contributed importantly” group eligibility requirement of Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, was not met, nor was there a shift in production from that firm to a foreign country. The “contributed importantly” test is generally demonstrated through a survey of the workers' firm's customers. The survey revealed that imports of shoe boxes were minimal during the relevant period and imports did not contribute importantly to separations at the subject firm. The subject firm did not import shoe boxes nor did it shift production to a foreign country during the relevant period. The petitioner alleges that the subject firm lost its business due to the customers shifting their production of shoes abroad and buying shoe boxes overseas. The petitioner concludes that, because the production of shoes occurs abroad, the subject firm workers producing shoe boxes are import impacted. In order to establish import impact, the Department must consider imports that are like or directly competitive with those produced at the subject firm. The Department conducted a survey of the subject firm's major declining customer regarding their purchases of shoe boxes. The survey revealed that the declining customers did not import shoe boxes during the relevant period. The petitioner further cites a list of customers which shifted their production overseas and imported shoe boxes back to the United States. Some of these customers were already surveyed by the Department during the original investigation. A review of the survey responses confirms import purchases of show boxes were minimal and did not contribute importantly to the layoffs at the subject plant during the relevant period. A company official was contacted to verify the allegations regarding the customers which were not surveyed during the initial investigation. The official stated that all of these companies were customers of the subject firm in the years prior to 2001, which is outside of the relevant time period. Conclusion After review of the application and investigative findings, I conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department of Labor's prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied. Signed at Washington, DC day 22nd of June, 2005. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5-3739 Filed 7-13-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-51,750] Federated Merchandising Group, a Part of the Federated Department Stores, New York, NY; Notice of Negative Determination on Remand By Order dated February 7, 2005, the United States Court of International Trade (USCIT) directed the Department of Labor (Department) to further investigate *Former Employees of Federated Merchandising Group, a Part of Federated Department Stores* v. *United States* (Court No. 03-00689). The Department's denial of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance for the subject worker group was issued on June 10, 2003 and the Notice of determination was published in the **Federal Register** on June 19, 2003 (68 FR 36846). Workers produced paper patterns and sample garments at the subject facility. The investigation revealed that worker separations at the subject facility are not attributable to either increased in imports or a shift of production abroad of paper patterns and sample garments, but are attributable to a change in the company's production technology which resulted in substitution of the manual labor by computer design programs. By application of July 2, 2003, the workers requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination. In the request for reconsideration, the workers assert that the subject company could not have replaced the manual labor with a computer program (due to the complexity of decision making required in pattern making and the physical demands required to construct sample garments) and that the subject company must have outsourced production (possibly to a foreign source). The Department contacted a company official and was informed that the computer program had reduced the need for manpower and that the work performed by the petitioners had not been outsourced, domestically or abroad. The Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration was issued on August 19, 2003 and published in the **Federal Register** on September 30, 2003 (68 FR 56327). The workers' request was denied because there was no error or misunderstanding of the law or facts in the investigation. By letter dated September 24, 2003, the petitioners appealed to the USCIT for judicial review. In the appeal, the petitioners alleged that a computer pattern making program cannot replace human pattern makers, but was merely a tool to be used by the subject workers, and stated that it is their belief that their jobs were being outsourced abroad since the subject firm has not reduced the number of styles produced. On February 7, 2005, the USCIT directed the Department to investigate into the petitioner's allegation that the new computer program cannot replace the human pattern makers, to determine the reason(s) for the subject firm's reduced need for garment samples and patterns in the period prior to the subject workers' separations, and to determine the subject workers' eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance as provided by the Trade Act of 1974. In response to the petitioners' claim that the new computer program could not have replaced the manual pattern makers, the Department contacted a company official for clarification about the pattern making process. The company official described the process and explained how the need for manual pattern making was reduced by new pattern making technology. The company official also clarified that the sample makers made samples from manually created patterns and not the computer-generated patterns. Prior to the new technology, technical pattern design teams created new patterns with the pattern makers drawing each new pattern by hand based on the designers' advice. The new pattern making technology enabled the technical designers to access a library of electronically-stored patterns and utilize those patterns in creating new patterns, thereby reducing the need for hand-drawn patterns. As the technology became more efficient, the need for manual pattern makers decreased. Prior to the workers' separations in January 2003, the subject company had conducted a productivity analysis and concluded that there was not enough work to justify the then-current staffing levels of manual pattern makers and sample makers. There was a reduced need for the manual pattern makers due to increased productivity in other areas of production and decreased need for new patterns as existing patterns stored in the computer could be recalled and utilized. The company determined that one manual pattern maker could manage the workload of four manual pattern makers, and reduced the staff accordingly. Since the manual sample makers created samples from the patterns drawn by the manual pattern makers, the need for manual sample makers decreased as the number of hand-drawn patterns decreased. Thus, the level of manual staffing was reduced to match the level of manual pattern makers. While sample imports increased after the implementation of new technology in March 2003, the company's submissions clearly show that the separations were not due to the subject company shifting production abroad or increasing imports of patterns or samples during the relevant period, but due to the subject company's institution of production improvement measures which resulted in the reduced need for manual labor in general. As such, the Department has determined that the workers have not met the criteria set forth in Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, and are not eligible to apply for worker adjustment assistance. Conclusion After reconsideration on remand, I affirm the original notice of negative determination of eligibility to apply for adjustment assistance for workers and former workers of Federated Merchandising Group, a Part of Federated Department Stores, New York, New York. Signed at Washington, DC, this 6th day of July, 2005. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5-3735 Filed 7-13-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-57,232] Ingram Micro, Santa Ana, CA; Notice of Termination of Investigation Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on May 23, 2005 in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Ingram Micro, Santa Ana, California. The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of June, 2005. Richard Church, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5-3744 Filed 7-13-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-57,121] J.E. Morgan Knitting Mills (Sara Lee) Tamaqua, PA; Notice of Termination of Investigation Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on May 5, 2005 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at J.E. Morgan Knitting Mills (Sara Lee), Tamaqua, Pennsylvania. The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. Signed in Washington, DC, this 17th day of June, 2005. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5-3741 Filed 7-13-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Investigations Regarding Certifications of Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (“the Act”) and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to Section 221(a) of the Act. The purpose of each of the investigations is to determine whether the workers are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title II, Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. The petitioners or any other persons showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigations may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than June 25, 2005. Interested persons are invited to submit written comments regarding the subject matter of the investigations to the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than June 25, 2005. The petitions filed in this case are available for inspection at the Office of the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room C-5311, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of June, 2005. Timothy Sullivan, Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. Appendix [Petitions instituted between 06/06/2005 and 06/10/2005] TA-W Subject firm (petitioners) Location Date of institution Date of petition 57,315 Magruder Color (State) Elizabeth, NJ 06/06/2005 06/06/2005 57,316 Flow Robotic Systems, Inc.

(Wkrs)Wixom, MI 06/06/2005 06/06/2005 57,317 Power-One

(Wkrs)Andover, MA 06/06/2005 06/06/2005 57,318 Seneca Foods Corp.

(Wkrs)Dayton, WA 06/06/2005 06/03/2005 57,319 L.R. Nelson Corporation (State) Peoria, IL 06/06/2005 06/02/2005 57,320 Sabre Inc.

(NPS)Southlake, TX 06/06/2005 06/03/2005 57,321 Reum Corporation (State) Waukegan, IL 06/07/2005 06/06/2005 57,322 Danaher Tool Group (State) West Hartford, CT 06/07/2005 06/07/2005 57,323 American Safety Razor Company

(Comp)Knoxville, TN 06/07/2005 06/01/2005 57,324 Plymouth Rubber Co., Inc.

(Comp)Canton, MA 06/07/2005 06/06/2005 57,325 Danly IEM (AFLCIO) Beaver Dam, WI 06/07/2005 06/02/2005 57,326 Intel Corporation

(Wkrs)Hillsboro, OR 06/08/2005 06/03/2005 57,327 WestPoint Stevens

(Comp)Lanett, AL 06/08/2005 06/06/2005 57,328 REHAU, Inc.

(Comp)Sturgis, MI 06/08/2005 06/01/2005 57,329 Kimberly-Clark

(Comp)Fort Worth, TX 06/08/2005 04/01/2005 57,330 Davy Manufacturing

(Wkrs)Collingdale, PA 06/08/2005 06/01/0005 57,331 Ready Fixtures

(MCIW)Shell Lake, WI 06/08/2005 05/31/2005 57,332 Fabry Industries

(Wkrs)Green Bay, WI 06/08/2005 06/07/2005 57,333 Ready Metal Manufacturing, Co.

(Comp)Chicago, IL 06/08/2005 06/07/2005 57,334 Century Furniture Ind.

(Comp)Longview, NC 06/08/2005 06/07/2005 57,335 Teledyne Instruments (State) City of Industry, CA 06/08/2005 06/07/2005 57,336 United Machine Works, Inc.

(Comp)Bethel, NC 06/08/2005 06/03/2005 57,337 Bernhardt

(Wkrs)Lenoir, NC 06/08/2005 05/25/2005 57,338 Cardinal Home Products

(Comp)Linesville, PA 06/08/2005 06/08/2005 57,339 Frazer and Jones Co.

(Comp)Soway, NY 06/08/2005 05/23/2005 57,340 Top Ride Fashion

(Comp)S. El Monte, CA 06/08/2005 05/16/2005 57,341 Haggar Clothing Co.

(Wkrs)Weslaco, TX 06/08/2005 05/26/2005 57,342 Bemis Company, Inc.

(Comp)Dallas, TX 06/09/2005 06/07/2005 57,343 IBM OS Systems Support

(NPS)Royston, GA 06/09/2005 06/06/2005 57,344 Kulicke and Soffa Industries

(Comp)San Jose, CA 06/09/2005 06/08/2005 57,345 Merrimac Paper Co., Inc.

(Comp)Lawrence, MA 06/09/2005 06/02/2005 57,346 Linn, Inc.

(Comp)Parsons, TN 06/09/2005 06/03/2005 57,347 Hart Furniture Mfg. Company (State) Corning, AR 06/09/2005 06/08/2005 57,348 Magnus Group

(Comp)Emigsville, PA 06/09/2005 06/09/2005 57,349 PMC—Sierra

(Comp)Santa Clara, CA 06/09/2005 06/06/2005 57,350 Motor Appliance Corporation

(IBT)Washington, MO 06/09/2005 06/09/2005 57,351 Medicare Assoc. of United Gov't Srvs, LLC

(Wkrs)Ashland, WI 06/09/2005 06/04/2005 57,352 Specialty Filaments, Inc.

(Wkrs)Burlington, VT 06/09/2005 05/23/2005 57,353 WestPoint Stevens

(Comp)Wagram, NC 06/10/2005 06/10/2005 57,354 Visteon Systems, LLC

(IUE)Connersville, IN 06/10/2005 06/10/2005 57,355 FEMDS, Inc.

(Comp)Gaithersburg, MD 06/10/2005 06/10/2005 57,356 KeyTronicEMS

(Comp)Las Cruces, NM 06/10/2005 06/08/2005 57,357 Hewlett Packard Company

(Wkrs)Cincinnati, OH 06/10/2005 05/31/2005 57,358 Northwest Staffing Resources (State) Beaverton, OR 06/10/2005 06/09/2005 57,359A Mid-West Metal Products Co., Inc.

(Comp)Muncie, IN 06/10/2005 05/11/2005 57,359B Mid-West Metal Products Co., Inc.

(Comp)Muncie, IN 06/10/2005 05/11/2005 57,359C Mid-West Metal Products Co., Inc.

(Comp)Muncie, IN 06/10/2005 05/11/2005 57,359D Mid-West Metal Products Co., Inc.

(Comp)Muncie, IN 06/10/2005 05/11/2005 57,359 Mid-West Metal Products Co., Inc.

(Comp)Muncie, IN 06/10/2005 05/11/2005 57,360 Lucent Technologies

(Wkrs)Columbus, OH 06/10/2005 05/27/2005 57,361 ACS—Affiliated Computer Services

(Wkrs)Kennett, MO 06/10/2005 06/01/2005 57,362 Sony Electronics

(Wkrs)San Jose, CA 06/10/2005 06/01/2005 57,363 Rhoda Lee (UNITE) New York, NY 06/10/2005 05/20/2005 57,364 Akro-Mils

(Comp)Akron, OH 06/10/2005 05/26/2005 57,365 Best Manufacturing

(Comp)Cordele, GA 06/10/2005 06/05/2005 57,366 Office Depot

(NPS)Torrance, CA 06/10/2005 06/02/2005 [FR Doc. E5-3749 Filed 7-13-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-56,867] Manual Transmissions of Muncie, LLC, Muncie, IN; Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration of Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance By letter dated June 15, 2005, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Region 3 and Local 499 requested administrative reconsideration regarding Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

(ATAA)applicable to workers of the subject firm. The negative determination was signed on May 13, 2005, and was published in the **Federal Register** on June 13, 2005 (70 FR 34155). The workers of Manual Transmissions of Muncie, LLC, Muncie, Indiana were certified eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance

(TAA)on May 13, 2005. The initial ATAA investigation determined that the skills of the subject worker group are easily transferable to other positions in the local area. In the request for reconsideration, the union representative provided new information confirming that the skills of the workers at the subject firm are not easily transferable in the local commuting area. Additional investigation has determined that the workers possess skills that are not easily transferable. A significant number or proportion of the worker group are age fifty years or over. Competitive conditions within the industry are adverse. Conclusion After careful review of the additional facts obtained on reconsideration, I conclude that the requirements of Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, have been met for workers at the subject firm. In accordance with the provisions of the Act, I make the following certification: “All workers of Manual Transmissions of Muncie, LLC, Muncie, Indiana, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after March 21, 2004 through May 13, 2007, are eligible to apply for trade adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.” Signed in Washington, DC, this 1st day of July, 2005. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5-3737 Filed 7-13-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, (19 U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade adjustment assistance

(ATAA)by (TA-W) number issued during the periods of June 2005. In order for an affirmative determination to be made and a certification of eligibility to apply for directly-impacted (primary) worker adjustment assistance to be issued, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision have decreased absolutely; and C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. There has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or subdivision to a foreign county of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or subdivision; and C. One of the following must be satisfied: 1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United States; 2. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act; or 3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are or were produced by such firm or subdivision. Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made and a certification of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance as an adversely affected secondary group to be issued, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met.

(1)Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers' firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2)The workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related to the article that was the basis for such certification; and

(3)Either—

(A)The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph

(2)accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or

(B)A loss or business by the workers' firm with the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph

(2)contributed importantly to the workers' separation or threat of separation. Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the criteria for eligibility have not been met for the reasons specified. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B) (No shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. *TA-W-57,077; Radicispandex Corp., Fall River, MA* *TA-W-57,141; Stanbury Uniforms, Inc., Waxahachie, TX* *TA-W-57,253; Intermark Fabric Corp., including leased workers of Placement Pros and Staffing Consultants, Plainfield, CT* *TA-W-57,253; Vision Knits, Inc., Albemarle, NC* *TA—W-57,025; AGC Automotive, TN, Inc., Mt. Pleasant, TN* The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.)(Sales or production, or both, did not decline) and

(B)(II.B) (No shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. *TA-W-57,108; Parker Hannifin Corp., Minneapolis, MN* *TA-W-57,174; Microsemi Corp., Colorado Div., Broomfield, CO* *TA-W-57,189; Elliott Company, Jeannette, PA* *TA-W-57,287A; Stora Enso North America, Biron Mill, Wisconsin Rapids, WI* The investigation revealed that criterion (a)(2)(A)(I.A) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A) (no employment decline) has not been met. *TA-W-57,138; New Hope Weavers Ltd, Lansdale, PA* *TA-W-57,237; Tingstol Company, on-site workers employed at Honeywell, Inc., Golden Valley, MN* *TA-W-57,196; K & T Jewelry and Accessories, Inc., Providence, RI* The workers firm does not produce an article as required for certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974. *TA-W-57,320; Sabre, Inc., Travel Network North America Div., Southlake, TX* *TA-W-57,165; Panasonic Mobile Communication Development, a div. of Panasonic Mobile Communications, Suwanee, GA* *TA-W-57,149; MCI, Service Deliver Div., a subsidiary of MCI, Inc., Weldon Springs, MO* *TA-W-57,157; Ted Thorsen, LLC, Wilkes-Barre, PA* *TA-W-57,128; Northwest Airlines, Inc., Technical Operations—MSP, Bloomington, MN* *TA-W-57,118; Lucerne Textiles, Inc., New York, NY* *TA-W-57,130; Barrow Industries, Inc., including on-site workers employed at Canton Samples, Inc., Norwood, MA* *TA-W-57,245; Delta Air Lines, Technical Operations, Atlanta, GA* *TA-W-57,300; Aegis Communications Group, Irving, TX* The investigation revealed that criterion (a)(2)(A) (I.C) (Increased imports and (a)(2)(B) (II.C) (has shifted production to a foreign country) have not been met. *TA-W-56,898; **Eastman Chemical Company, Arkansas Operations Div., Batesville, AR* Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued; the date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of

(A)(increased imports) of Section 222 have been met. *TA-W-57,124; Jeanerette Shipping Co., Inc., a div. of Jeanerette Sugar Company, Inc., Jeanerette, LA: May 5, 2004.* *TA-W-57,249; Lamplight Farms, Inc., including on-site leased workers of PA Staffing, Inc., QPS Staffing Services, Inc., Menomonee Falls, WI: May 24, 2004.* *TA-W-57,195; True Manufacturing Co., a div. of The True Value Co., Paint Brush Manufacturing Div., Cary, IL: May 9, 2004.* *TA-W-57,167; DB Roberts Company, Workers at Sanmina-SCI, Westbrook, ME: May 13, 2004.* *TA-W-57,126; Tekmax, Inc., a subsidiary of Mitek Industries, Inc., Tangent, OR: April 28, 2004.* *TA-W-57,116; Rockville Fabrics Corp., Active Quilting Div., Plains, PA: May 2, 2004.* *TA-57,087; Strandflex, div. of Maryland Specialty Wire, Oriskany, NY: April 22, 2004.* *TA-W-57,274; Laidlaw Corp., Monticello, WI: May 27, 2004.* *TA-W-57,159; Electro-Mel Industries, Inc., Hazelhurst, WI: May 4, 2004.* *TA-W-57,127; J.T. Shannon Lumber Company, including on-site leased workers of All Seasons Temporaries, Pennsylvania Div., Tidioute, PA: April 22, 2004.* *TA-W-57,112; Broyhill Furniture Industries, Inc., Broyhill Corp. Office, Lenoir, NC: April 18, 2004.* *TA-W-57,096; GE Infrastructure, Sensing Div., Edison, NJ: May 2, 2004.* *TA-W-57,049; Acuity Lighting Group, a subsidiary of Acuity Brands, Inc., Conyers, GA: April 21, 2004.* *TA-W-57,041; Louisiana-Pacific Corp., Hayden Lake, ID: April 19, 2004* *TA-W-57,008; Caldwell VSR, Inc., Weslaco, TX: April 19, 2004.* *TA-W-56,630; Sherwood Harsco Gasserv, a subsidiary of- Harsco Corp., Washington, PA: February 22, 2004.* * TA-W-57,177; Broyhill Furniture Industries, Inc., Occasional #1 Plant, Lenoir, NC, A; Broyhill Harper Furniture, Lenoir, NC, B; Lenoir Chair #1 Plant, Lenoir, NC, C; Broyhill Marion Plant, Marion, NC, D; Broyhill Particleboard Plant, Lenoir, NC, E; Central Lumber Yard, Lenoir, NC, F; Broyhill Central Warehouse, Lenoir, NC and G; Broyhill Security, Lenoir, NC: April 10, 2005. * *TA-W-57,155; Thomson, Inc., Thomson Marion Div., Marion, IN: April 10, 2005.* *TA-W-57,287; Stora Enso North America, Wisconsin Rapids Mill, Wisconsin Rapids, WI: June 17, 2005* The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of

(B)(shift in production) of Section 222 have been met. *TA-W-57,281; Continental JC., Inc., New York, NY: June 1, 2004.* *TA-W-57,219; Riverside Paper Corp., Kerwin Paper Mill, Appleton, WI: May 16, 2004.* *TA-W-57,332; FI-Fabry Industries, Green Bay, WI: November 13, 2004.* *TA-W-57,301; Contec, LLC, a subsidiary of Contec Holdings, LLC, including leased workers of Available Personnel and Kelly Services, Seattle, WA: June 1, 2004.* *TA-W-57,246; TRW Automotive U.S. LLC, Engine Components North American Technical Center, Engine Lab Department, Warrensville, Heights, OH: May 24, 2004.* *TA-W-57,226; Danly IEM, Ionia, MI: May 2, 2004.* *TA-W-57,134; Zomax, Inc., including on-site leased workers of West Valley, Staffing Group, Fremont, CA: April 27, 2004.* *TA-W-57,122; Tower Automotive, Inc., Croydon, IN: May 4, 2004.* *TA-W-57,280; Elringklinger Sealing Systems (USA), Inc., a subsidiary of Elringklinger AG, including on-site leased workers from Personnel Unlimited, Livonia, MI: May 27, 2004.* *TA-W-57,235; 3M Company, Automotive Div., Stillwater, MN: May 20, 2004.* *TA-W-57,188; Neat Feet Hosiery, Inc., Stoneville, NC: May 12, 2004.* *TA-W-57,233; Culp, Inc., Corporate Headquarters, High Point, NC: May 19, 2004.* *TA-W-57,229; Renaissance Mark, Bowling Green, KY: May 16, 2004.* *TA-W-57,178; C-Tech Industries, d/b/a The Hotsy Corporation, Humboldt, IA: May 13, 2004.* *TA-W-57,374; United Plastics Group, Inc., El Paso Division, including on-site leased workers of Integrated Human Capital, El Paso, TX: June 14, 2004.* *TA-W-57,142; Culp, Inc., including the following Divisions, Culp Upholstery Prints, Culp Central Distribution Center and Culp Sample Department, Burlington, NC: May 5, 2004.* *TA-W-57,140; Culp, Inc., Culp Design Center, Burlington, NC: May 9, 2004.* The following certifications have been issued. The requirement of upstream supplier to a trade certified primary firm has been met. None Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

(ATAA)for older workers, the group eligibility requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met. In the following cases, it has been determined that the requirements of Section 246(a)3)ii) have not been met for the reasons specified. The Department as determined that criterion

(2)of Section 246 has not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily transferable. *TA-W-57,219; Riverside Paper Corporation, Kerwin Paper Mill, Appleton, WI* *TA-W-57,281; Continental JC., Inc., New York, NY* *TA-W-52,419; Nestaway, a div. of Axia, Inc., Cleveland, OH* *TA-W-53,395; Du-Co Ceramics Co., Saxonburg, PA* The Department as determined that criterion

(1)of Section 246 has not been met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of age or older. *TA-W-57,124; Jeanerette Shipping Company, Inc., a div. of Jeanerette Sugar Company, Inc., Jeanerette, LA* Since the workers are denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA. *TA-W-57,077; Radicispandex Corp., Fall River, MA* *TA-W-57,141; Stanbury Uniforms, Inc., Waxahachie, TX* *TA-W-57,253; Intermark Fabric Corp., including leased workers of Placement Pros and Staffing Consultants, Plainfield, CT* *TA-W-57,253; Vision Knits, Inc., Albemarle, NC* *TA-W-57,025; AGC Automotive, TN, Inc., Mt. Pleasant, TN* *TA-W-57,108; Parker Hannifin Corp., Minneapolis, MN* *TA-W-57,174; Microsemi Corp., Colorado Div., Broomfield, CO* *TA-W-57,189; Elliott Company, Jeannette, PA* *TA-W-57,138; New Hope Weavers, Ltd, Lansdale, PA* *TA-W-57,237; Tingstol Company, on-site workers employed at Honeywell, Inc., Golden Valley, MN* *TA-W-57,196; K & T Jewelry and Accessories, Inc., Providence, RI* *TA-W-57,149; MCI, Service Deliver Div., a subsidiary of MCI, Inc., Weldon Springs, MO* *TA-W-57,157; Ted Thorsen, LLC, Wilkes-Barre, PA* *TA-W-57,128; Northwest Airlines, Inc., Technical Operations—MSP, Bloomington, MN* *TA-W-57,118; Lucerne Textiles, Inc., New York, NY* *TA-W-57,130; Barrow Industries, Inc., including on-site workers employed at Canton Samples, Inc., Norwood, MA* *TA-W-57,245; Delta Air Lines, Technical Operations, Atlanta, GA* *TA-W-57,300; Aegis Communications Group, Irving, TX* *TA-W-57,287A; Stora Enso North America, Biron Mill, Wisconsin Rapids, WI* Affirmative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

(ATAA)for older workers, the group eligibility requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met. The following certifications have been issued; the date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determinations. In the following cases, it has been determined that the requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(ii) have been met. I. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are 50 years of age or older. II. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are not easily transferable. III. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry ( *i.e.,* conditions within the industry are adverse). *TA-W-54,712; Gemeinhardt Company, Elkhart, IN: April 12, 2003 through May 25, 2006.* *TA-W-52,243; Nestle Purina Pet Food, St. Joseph, MO: July 1, 2002 through August 22, 2005.* *TA-W-52,239; Titan Tire Corp., Des Moines, IA: June 24, 2002 through October 2, 2005.* * TA-W-53,026; Metaldyne Driveline/Hydraulics Group, Bedford Heights, OH: September 17, 2002 through November 14, 2005. * *TA-W-57,140; Culp, Inc., Culp Design Center, Burlington, NC: May 9, 2004.* *TA-W-57,155; Thomson, Inc., Thomson Marion Div., Marion, IN: April 10, 2005.* *TA-W-57,177; Broyhill Furniture Industries, Inc., Occasional #1 Plant, Lenoir, NC, A; Broyhill Harper Furniture, Lenoir, NC, B; Lenoir Chair #1 Plant, Lenoir, NC, C; Broyhill Marion Plant, Marion, NC, D; Broyhill Particleboard Plant, Lenoir, NC, E; Central Lumber Yard, Lenoir, NC, F; Broyhill Central Warehouse, Lenoir, NC, G; Broyhill Security, Lenoir, NC: April 29, 2004.* *TA-W-57,178; C-Tech Industries, d/b/a The Hotsy Corp., Humboldt, IA: May 13, 2004.* *TA-W-57,229; Renaissance Mark, Bowling Green, KY: May 16, 2004.* *TA-W-57,233; Culp, Inc., Corporate Headquarters, High Point, NC: May 19, 2004.* *TA-W-56,630; Sherwood Harsco Gasserv, a subsidiary of Harsco Corp., Washington, PA: February 22, 2004.* *TA-W-56,839; Exide Technologies, Shreveport, LA: March 23, 2004.* *TA-W-57,008; Caldwell VSR, Inc., Weslaco, TX: April 19, 2004.* *TA-W-57,041; Louisiana-Pacific Corp., Hayden Lake, ID: April 19, 2004.* *TA-W-57,049; Acuity Lighting Group, a subsidiary of Acuity Brands, Inc., Conyers, GA: April 21, 2004.* *TA-W-57,096; GE Infrastructure, Sensing Division, Edison, NJ: May 2, 2004.* *TA-W-57,112; Broyhill Furniture Industries, Inc., Broyhill Corporate Office, Lenoir, NC: April 18, 2004.* *TA-W-57,127; J.T. Shannon Lumber Company, including on-site leased workers of All Seasons Temporaries, Pennsylvania Div., Tidioute, PA: April 22, 2004.* *TA-W-57,159; Electro-Mel Industries, Inc., Hazelhurst, WI: May 4, 2004.* *TA-W-57,188; Neat Feet Hosiery, Inc., Stoneville, NC: May 12, 2004.* *TA-W-57,235; 3M Company, Automotive Div., Stillwater, MN: May 20, 2004.* *TA-W-57,274; Laidlaw Corporation, Monticello, WI: May 27, 2004.* *TA-W-57,280; Elringklinger Sealing Systems (USA), Inc., a subsidiary of Elringklinger AG, including on-site leased workers from Personnel Unlimited, Livonia, MI: May 27, 2004.* *TA-W-57,087; Strandflex, Div. of Maryland Specialty Wire, Oriskany, NY: April 22, 2004.* *TA-W-57,116; Rockville Fabrics Corporation, Active Quilting Div., Plains, PA: May 2, 2004.* *TA-W-57,122; Tower Automotive, Inc., Croydon, IN: May 4, 2004* *TA-W-57,126; Tekmax, Inc., a subsidiary of Mitek Industries, Inc., Tangent, OR: April 28, 2004.* *TA-W-57,134; Zomax, Inc., including on-site leased workers of West Valley, Staffing Group, Fremont, CA: April 27, 2004.* *TA-W-57,167; DB Roberts Company, Workers at Sanmina-SCI, Westbrook, ME: May 13, 2004.* *TA-W-57,195; True Manufacturing Company, a div. of The True Value Company, Paint Brush Manufacturing Div., Cary, IL: May 9, 2004.* *TA-W-57,226; Danly IEM, Ionia, MI: May 2, 2004.* *TA-W-57,246; TRW Automotive U.S. LLC, Engine Components North American Technical Center, Engine Lab Department, Warrensville Heights, OH: May 24, 2004.* *TA-W-57,249; Lamplight Farms, Inc., including on-site leased workers of PA Staffing, Inc., QPS Staffing Services, Inc., Menomonee Falls, WI: May 24, 2004.* *TA-W-57,287; Stora Enso North America, Wisconsin Rapids Mill, Wisconsin Rapids, WI: June 17, 2005.* *TA-W-57,301; Contec, LLC, a subsidiary of Contec Holdings, LLC, including leased workers of Available Personnel and Kelly Services, Seattle, WA: June 1, 2004.* *TA-W-57,332; FI-Fabry Industries, Green Bay, WI: November 13, 2004.* *TA-W-55,319; Danaher Linear Motion Systems, a div. of The Danaher Motion Group, formerly known as Thomson Bay Co., Bay City, MI: July 19, 2003 through October 8, 2006.* *TA-W-53,587; Sensient Imaging Technologies, Inc., (formerly Formulabs), Industrial Ink Div., Piqua, OH: October 28, 2002 through December 18, 2005.* *TA-W-54,804; Southern Glove Manufacturing Co., Inc., Cumberland Glove Div., Duffield, VA: April 19, 2003 through May 28, 2006.* *TA-W-54,257; MCS Industries, Inc., including leased workers of Adecco Personnel, Allied Personnel Services, and Job Connection, Easton, PA: February 10, 2003 through March 2, 2006.* *TA-W-54,195; Tyco Valves & Controls N.A., Foundry, Prophetstown, IL: February 4, 2003 through February 19, 2006.* *TA-W-52,173; Carr Lowrey Glass Co., Baltimore, MD: June 27, 2002 through August 13, 2005.* *TA-W-53,087; Manchester Tool Co., Akron, OH: September 18, 2002 through November 12, 2005.* *TA-W-53,481; Springs Industries, Inc., including leased workers of Phillips Staffing, including contract workers of Johnson Controls, Inc., Springfield Plant, Laurel Hill, NC: October 31, 2002 through November 24, 2005.* *TA-W-53,677; Smead Manufacturing Co., Logan, OH: November 18, 2002 through December 22, 2005.* I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the months of June 2005. Copies of these determinations are available for inspection in Room C-5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 during normal business hours or will be mailed to persons who write to the above address. Dated: June 29, 2005. Timothy Sullivan, Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5-3748 Filed 7-13-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-57,114] Selkirk, LLC; Logan, OH; Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration of Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance By letter dated June 8, 2005, a company official requested administrative reconsideration regarding Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

(ATAA)applicable to workers of the subject firm. The negative determination was signed on May 17, 2005, and was published in the **Federal Register** on June 13, 2005 (70 FR 34155). The workers of Selkirk, LLC, Logan, Ohio were certified eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance

(TAA)on May 17, 2005. The initial ATAA investigation determined that the skills of the subject worker group are easily transferable to other positions in the local area. In the request for reconsideration, the company official provided new information confirming that the skills of the workers at the subject firm are not easily transferable in the local commuting area. Additional investigation has determined that the workers possess skills that are not easily transferable. A significant number or proportion of the worker group are age fifty years or over. Competitive conditions within the industry are adverse. Conclusion After careful review of the additional facts obtained on reconsideration, I conclude that the requirements of Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, have been met for workers at the subject firm. In accordance with the provisions of the Act, I make the following certification: “All workers of Selkirk, LLC, Logan, Ohio, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after May 28, 2005 through May 17, 2007, are eligible to apply for trade adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.” “I further determine that all workers of Selkirk, LLC, Logan, Ohio, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after April 26, 2004 through May 17, 2007 are eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.” Signed in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of June 2005. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5-3740 Filed 7-13-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-55,448] Sheaffer Manufacturing Company, LLC, Fort Madison, IA; Revised Determination on Reopening Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance On June 21, 2005, the Department on its own motion reopened the investigation regarding Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

(ATAA)applicable to workers of the subject firm. The negative determination was signed on September 23, 2004, and was published in the **Federal Register** on October 26, 2004 (69 FR 62461). The workers of Sheaffer Manufacturing Company, LLC, Fort Madison, Iowa were certified eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance

(TAA)on September 23, 2004. The initial ATAA investigation determined that the skills of the subject worker group are easily transferable to other positions in the local area. New information provided by the company contains new facts of a substantive nature bearing on the determination. Upon further contact with a company official, it was confirmed that the information provided by the company was incorrectly reported during the initial investigation. During the initial investigation it was reported that the skills of the workers at the subject firm are easily transferable. It has been determined by new information provided by the company that the skills of the workers at the subject firm are not easily transferable in the local commuting area. Upon further investigation it has been determined that a significant number or proportion of the worker group are age fifty years or over. Competitive conditions within the industry are adverse. Conclusion After careful review of the additional facts obtained on reconsideration, I conclude that the requirements of Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, have been met for workers at the subject firm. In accordance with the provisions of the Act, I make the following certification: “All workers of Sheaffer Manufacturing Company, LLC, Fort Madison, Iowa, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after August 9, 2003 through September 23, 2006, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.” Signed in Washington, DC, this 22nd day of June, 2005. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5-3736 Filed 7-13-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment Standards Administration Proposed Collection; Comment Request ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a preclearance consultation program to provide the general public and Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This program helps to ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed. Currently, the Employment Standards Administration is soliciting comments concerning the proposed collection: Agreement and Undertaking (OWCP-1). A copy of the proposed information collection request can be obtained by contacting the office listed below in the addresses section of this Notice. DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the addresses section below on or before September 12, 2005. ADDRESSES: Ms. Hazel M. Bell, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Ave., NW., Room S-3201, Washington, DC 20210, telephone

(202)693-0418, fax

(202)693-1451, e-mail: *bell.hazel@dol.gov.* Please use only one method of transmission for comments (mail, fax, or e-mail). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. *Background:* Coal Mine operators and Longshore companies desiring to be self-insurers are required by law (30 U.S.C. 933 BL and 33 U.S.C. 932 LS) to produce security in terms of an indemnity bond, security deposit, or for Black Lung only, a letter of credit or 501(c)(21) trust. Once a company's application to become self-insured is reviewed by the Division of Coal Mine Workers; Compensation (DCMWC) or by the Division of Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation (DLHWC) and it is determined the company is potentially eligible, an amount of security is determined to guarantee the payment of benefits required by the Act. The OWCP-1 form is executed by the self-insurer who agrees to abide by the Department's rules and authorizes the Secretary, in the event of default, to file suit to secure payment from a bond underwriter or in the case of a Federal Reserve account, to sell the securities for the same purpose. A company cannot be authorized to self-insure until this requirement is met. Regulations establishing this requirement are at 20 CFR 726.110 for Coal Mine/Black Lung and 20 CFR 703.304 for Longshore. This information collection is currently approved for use through December 31, 2005. II. *Review Focus:* The Department of Labor is particularly interested in comments which: • Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; • Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; • Enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and • Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, *e.g.* , permitting electronic submissions of responses. III. *Current Actions:* The Department of Labor seeks the approval of the extension of this information collection in order to determine if a coal mine or Longshore company is potentially eligible to become self-insured. The information is reviewed to insure that the correct amounts of negotiable securities are deposited or indemnity bond is purchased or for Black Lung only, a letter of credit or 501(c)(21) trust that in case of default OWCP has the authority to utilize the securities or bond. If this Agreement and Undertaking were not required, OWCP would not be empowered to utilize the company's security deposit to meet its financial responsibilities for the coal mine and Longshore benefits in case of default. *Type of Review:* Extension. *Agency:* Employment Standards Administration. *Titles:* Agreement of Undertaking. *OMB Number:* 1215-0034. *Agency Numbers:* OWCP-1. *Affected Public:* Business or other for-profit. *Total Respondents:* 300. *Total Annual Responses:* 300. *Estimated Total Burden Hours:* 75. *Estimated Time Per Response:* 15 minutes. *Frequency:* On Occasion. *Total Burden Cost (capital/startup):* $0. *Total Burden Cost (operating/maintenance):* $120.00. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for Office of Management and Budget approval of the information collection request; they will also become a matter of public record. Dated: July 8, 2005. Bruce Bohanon, Chief, Branch of Management Review and Internal Control, Division of Financial Management, Office of Management, Administration and Planning, Employment Standards Administration. [FR Doc. 05-13851 Filed 7-13-05; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 6

Traces to 6 documents

U.S. Code

CFR

1 reference not yet in our index