Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2005-04-01 · National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) · Notices

Notices. Final rule

806 words·~4 min read·/register/2005/04/01/05-6410

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4312-97-P NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION 36 CFR Part 1270 RIN 3095-AB40 Presidential Records Act Procedures AGENCY: National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: In response to a petition for rulemaking, NARA is amending our rules concerning Presidential records to lengthen the time from 10 working days to 35 calendar days to appeal denial of access. This proposed rule will affect the public. DATES: Effective May 2, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Davis Heaps at
(301)837-1801. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed rule was published in the October 1, 2004, **Federal Register** (69 FR 58875) for a 60-day public comment period. NARA notified several researcher organizations about the proposed rule. A copy of the proposed rule was also posted on the NARA Web site. NARA received three responses to the proposed rule from the public. NARA proposed, in response to a petition for proposed rulemaking, to extend the timeframe in which a person may appeal the denial of a request for access to Presidential records made under the Presidential Records Act
(PRA)(44 U.S.C. 2201-2207). Two public commenters agreed with the proposed regulation changes. One member of the public objected to NARA's proposed length of appeal time. The commenter said that a requester should be able to appeal NARA's letter of denial “within 35 working days after the requester receives written notification,” not “within 35 calendar days of the date of NARA's denial letter” as NARA proposed. We did not adopt that recommendation. The commenter argued that the proposed length in timeframe was unfair because the delivery of NARA's denial letter could be considerably delayed. The commenter said that the appeal timeframe should continue to be based on when the requester receives the denial, not the date of NARA's denial letter. NARA proposed the timeframe requested by the petitioners, which was based on the timeframe for appeals NARA permits under the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA)( *see* 36 CFR 1250.72(a)) and the Privacy Act
(PA)( *see* 36 CFR 1202.56(a)). The petition cited the following compelling reasons for requesting an extension to the length of time to file an appeal under the PRA: • NARA's longer appeal timeframes for FOIA and PA denials; • The disparity with the lengthy waits requesters have, only to learn of a denial of access; and, • Extenuating circumstances that make it difficult for requesters to appeal in 10 days after receipt of NARA's denial. Among the latter are requesters being on vacation, business trips, and academic absences like visiting professorships and sabbaticals. The petitioners' request is based on well-recognized and widely accepted practices in implementing the FOIA. NARA believes that this rule will be of assistance to requesters of Presidential records. This rule is not a significant regulatory action for the purposes of Executive Order 12866 and has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, it is hereby certified that this rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities because this rule applies to the public. This rule does not have any federalism implications. This rule is not a major rule as defined in 5 U.S.C. Chapter 8, Congressional Review of Agency Rulemaking. List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 1270 Archives and records. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, NARA amends part 1270 of title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows: PART 1270—PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS 1. The authority citation for part 1270 is revised to read as follows: Authority: 44 U.S.C. 2201-2207. 2. Amend § 1270.42 by revising paragraphs (a), (b), and
(d)to read as follows: Subpart D—Access to Presidential Records § 1270.42 Denial of access to public; right to appeal.
(a)Any person denied access to a Presidential record (hereinafter *the requester* ) because of a determination that the record or a reasonable segregable portion of the record was properly restricted under 44 U.S.C. 2204(a), and not placed in the public domain by the former President or his agent, may file an administrative appeal with the appropriate Presidential library director at the address cited in part 1253 of this chapter.
(b)All appeals must be received by NARA within 35 calendar days of the date of NARA's denial letter.
(d)Upon receipt of an appeal, the appropriate Presidential library director has 30 working days from the date an appeal is received to consider the appeal and respond in writing to the requester. The director's response must state whether or not the Presidential records requested are to be released and the basis for this determination. The director's decision to withhold release of Presidential records is final and not subject to judicial review. Dated: March 25, 2005. Allen Weinstein, Archivist of the United States. [FR Doc. 05-6410 Filed 3-31-05; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 4
2 references not yet in our index
  • 36 CFR 1270
  • 44 USC 2201-2207
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Final rule
Cite36 CFR 1270
Cite44 USC 2201-2207
Cites 6Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.