Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2004-07-15 · Food and Drug Administration, HHS · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Notice; withdrawal

308 words·~1 min read·/register/2004/07/15/04-16036

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4184-01-M DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. 2004D-0160] Withdrawal of Guidance Document on Use of Unapproved Hormone Implants in Veal Calves AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice; withdrawal. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration
(FDA)is withdrawing a guidance for industry (#172) entitled “Use of Unapproved Hormone Implants in Veal Calves.” This guidance, which was issued on April 2, 2004, is being withdrawn because the policy contained within it only applied to veal calves presented for slaughter prior to June 6, 2004. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gloria J. Dunnavan, Center for Veterinary Medicine (HFV-230), Food and Drug Administration, 7500 Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855, 301-827-1166, e-mail: *gloria.dunnavan@fda.gov* . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the **Federal Register** dated April 8, 2004 (69 FR 18594), FDA announced the availability of a guidance for industry (#172) entitled “Use of Unapproved Hormone Implants in Veal Calves.” This guidance outlined special measures to ensure the safety of veal in response to the identified illegal use of unapproved hormone implants in veal calves. The policy outlined in this guidance only applied to veal calves presented for slaughter prior to June 6, 2004. Therefore, the guidance is no longer relevant and is being withdrawn. Because there is no approved animal drug application providing for the use of these implants in veal calves, such use is illegal. Under section 512 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 360b), use of an unapproved new animal drug results in the drug being unsafe, and, therefore, the drugs are adulterated under section 501(a)(5) of the act (21 U.S.C. 351(a)(5)). In addition, food that bears or contains these drugs is adulterated under section 402(a)(2)(C)(ii) of the act (21 U.S.C. 342(a)(2)(C)(ii)). Dated: July 9, 2004. Jeffrey Shuren, Assistant Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 04-16036 Filed 7-14-04; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 3
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Notice; withdrawal
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.