Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2004-06-18 · DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL AERONAUTICS · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Final rule

721 words·~3 min read·/register/2004/06/18/04-13625

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION 48 CFR Part 31 [FAC 2001-24; FAR Case 2002-006; Item VIII] RIN 9000-AJ65 Federal Acquisition Regulation; Application of Cost Principles and Procedures and Accounting for Unallowable Costs AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council (Councils) have agreed on a final rule amending the Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR)to revise FAR 31.204, Application of principles and procedures, to improve clarity and structure. DATES: *Effective Date:* July 19, 2004. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The FAR Secretariat at
(202)501-4755 for information pertaining to status or publication schedules. For clarification of content, contact Mr. Edward Loeb, Policy Advisor, at
(202)501-0650. Please cite FAC 2001-24, FAR case 2002-006. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A. Background DoD, GSA, and NASA published a proposed rule in the **Federal Register** at (68 FR 28108) on May 22, 2003, with request for comments. The rule proposed to amend FAR 31.204, Application of principles and procedures, and FAR 31.201-6, Accounting for unallowable costs. Nine respondents submitted comments; however, no comments related to FAR 31.204. Therefore, the Councils concluded that the proposed rule should be converted to a final rule without changes. The proposed FAR rule also included proposed revisions to FAR 31.201-6, Accounting for unallowable costs. Due to significant changes made as a result of public comments received, the Councils have decided that the proposed revisions to FAR 31.201-6 will be published as a second proposed rule in a **Federal Register** notice under new FAR case 2004-006. This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not subject to review under Section 6(b) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804. B. Public Comments There were no public comments received on section 31.204. C. Regulatory Flexibility Act The Department of Defense, the General Services Administration, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration certify that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, *et seq.* , because most contracts awarded to small entities use simplified acquisition procedures or are awarded on a competitive, fixed-price basis, and do not require application of the cost principles and procedures discussed in this rule. For FY 2003, only 2.4 % of all contract actions were cost contracts awarded to small business. D. Paperwork Reduction Act The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the changes to the FAR do not impose information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, *et seq.* List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 31 Government procurement. Dated: June 10, 2004. Ralph J. De Stefano, Acting Director, Acquisition Policy Division. Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA amend 48 CFR part 31 as set forth below: PART 31—CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 31 is revised to read as follows: Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 42 U.S.C. 2473(c). 2. Amend section 31.204 in the first sentence of paragraph
(a)by removing “shall be allowed” and adding “are allowable” in its place; by revising paragraph (b); and by redesignating paragraph
(c)as paragraph
(d)and adding a new paragraph
(c)to read as follows: 31.204 Application of principles and procedures. (b)(1) For the following subcontract types, costs incurred as reimbursements or payments to a subcontractor are allowable to the extent the reimbursements or payments are for costs incurred by the subcontractor that are consistent with this part:
(i)Cost-reimbursement.
(ii)Fixed-price incentive.
(iii)Price redeterminable ( *i.e.* , fixed-price contracts with prospective price redetermination and fixed-ceiling-price contracts with retroactive price redetermination).
(2)The requirements of paragraph (b)(1) of this section apply to any tier above the first firm-fixed-price subcontract or fixed-price subcontract with economic price adjustment provisions.
(c)Costs incurred as payments under firm-fixed-price subcontracts or fixed-price subcontracts with economic price adjustment provisions or modifications thereto, for which subcontract cost analysis was performed are allowable if the price was negotiated in accordance with 31.102. [FR Doc. 04-13625 Filed 6-17-04; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 5
2 references not yet in our index
  • 48 CFR 31
  • 42 USC 2473(c)
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Final rule
Cite48 CFR 31
Cite42 USC 2473(c)
Cites 7Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.