Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2004-05-25 · Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Notice of regulatory review and request for comments

588 words·~3 min read·/register/2004/05/25/04-11742

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 3510-22-S 69 101 Tuesday, May 25, 2004 Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing Service 7 CFR Part 989 [Docket No. FV04-989-610 REVIEW] Raisins Produced From Grapes Grown in California AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. ACTION: Notice of regulatory review and request for comments. SUMMARY: This document announces that the Agricultural Marketing Service
(AMS)plans to review Marketing Order No. 989 for raisins produced from grapes grown in California, under criteria contained in section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). DATES: Written comments on this notice must be received by July 23, 2004. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments concerning this notice of review. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Fax:
(202)720-8938; or E-mail: *moab.docketclerk@usda.gov* or *http://www.regulations.gov.* All comments should reference the docket number and the date and page number of this issue of the **Federal Register** and will be made available for public inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk during regular business hours, or may be viewed at *http://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.* FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martin Engeler, Assistant Regional Manager, or Maureen T. Pello, Senior Marketing Specialist, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 2202 Monterey Street, Suite 102B, Fresno, CA 93721; telephone:
(559)487-5901; Fax:
(559)487-5906; E-mail: *Martin.Engeler@usda.gov* or *Maureen.Pello@usda.gov* ; or George Kelhart, Technical Advisor, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; telephone:
(202)720-2491; Fax:
(202)720-8938; or E-mail: *George.Kelhart@usda.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Marketing Order No. 989, as amended (7 CFR part 989), regulates the handling of raisins produced from grapes grown in California. The marketing order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 (AMAA), as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674). AMS initially published in the **Federal Register** (63 FR 8014; February 18, 1999), its plan to review certain regulations, including Marketing Order No. 989, under criteria contained in section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA; 5 U.S.C. 601-612). Updated plans were published in the **Federal Register** on January 4, 2002 (67 FR 525), and again on August 14, 2003 (68 FR 48574). Because many AMS regulations impact small entities, AMS has decided, as a matter of policy, to review certain regulations which, although they may not meet the threshold requirement under section 610 of the RFA, warrant review. The purpose of the review will be to determine whether the marketing order for raisins produced from grapes grown in California should be continued without change, amended, or rescinded (consistent with the objectives of the AMAA) to minimize the impacts on small entities. In conducting this review, AMS will consider the following factors:
(1)The continued need for the marketing order;
(2)the nature of complaints or comments received from the public concerning the marketing order;
(3)the complexity of the marketing order;
(4)the extent to which the marketing order overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts with other Federal rules, and, to the extent feasible, with State and local governmental rules; and
(5)the length of time since the marketing order has been evaluated or the degree to which technology, economic conditions, or other factors have changed in the area affected by the marketing order. Written comments, views, opinions, and other information regarding the raisin marketing order's impact on small businesses are invited. Dated: May 19, 2004. A.J. Yates, Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. 04-11742 Filed 5-24-04; 8:45 am]
Connections3 off-index
3 references not yet in our index
  • 7 CFR 989
  • 7 USC 601-674
  • 5 USC 601-612
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Notice of regulatory review and request for comments
Cite7 CFR 989
Cite7 USC 601-674
Cite5 USC 601-612
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.