Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2004-04-06 · Rural Housing Service, USDA · Notices

Notices. Proposed collection; comment request

446 words·~2 min read·/register/2004/04/06/04-7698

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 3410-06-P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Rural Housing Service Notice of Request for Extension of a Currently Approved Information Collection AGENCY: Rural Housing Service, USDA. ACTION: Proposed collection; comment request. SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice announces the Rural Housing Service's
(RHS)intention to request an extension for a currently approved information collection in support of the Section 502 Rural Housing Demonstration Program. DATES: Comments on this notice must be received by June 7, 2004,to be assured of consideration. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gloria L. Denson, Loan Specialist, Single Family Housing Direct Loan Division, RHS, U.S. Department of Agriculture, STOP 0783, South Building, Washington, DC 20250, Telephone 202-720-1474. (This is not a toll free number.) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: *Title:* Section 502 Rural Housing Demonstration Program. *OMB Number:* 0575-0114. *Expiration Date of Approval:* October 31, 2004. *Type of Request:* Extension of a currently approved information collection. *Abstract:* Under section 506 (b), RHS may provide loans for innovative housing units and systems which do not meet existing published standards, rules, regulations or policies. The intended effect is to increase the availability of affordable rural housing for low-income families through innovative designs and systems. *Estimate of Burden:* Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 80 hours to complete the application, Proposal Content and Criteria, including additional material, specifications and blueprints. *Respondents:* Business or other for profit. *Estimate Number of Respondents:* 25. *Estimated Number of Responses Per Respondent:* 1. *Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents:* 2,000 hours. Copies of this information collection can be obtained from Brigitte Sumter, Regulations and Paperwork Management Branch, at
(202)692-0042. *Comments:* Comments are invited on:
(a)Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of RHS, including whether the information will have practical utility;
(b)the accuracy of RHS's estimates of the burden of the proposed collection of information including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
(c)ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(d)ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments may be sent to Brigitte Sumter, Regulations and Paperwork Management Branch, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Rural Development, Stop 0742, Washington, DC 20250. All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will also become a matter of public record. Dated: March 19, 2004. Arthur A. Garcia, Administrator, Rural Housing Service. [FR Doc. 04-7698 Filed 4-5-04; 8:45 am]
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.