Proposed Rules. Proposed rule

316 words·~1 min read·/register/2003/12/10/03-30591

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 62 [NV108-SWIb; FRL-7595-6] Approval and Promulgation of State Air Quality Plans for Designated Facilities and Pollutants; Control of Emissions From Existing Commercial/Industrial Solid Waste Incinerator Units; Nevada AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve a negative declaration submitted by the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection. The negative declaration certifies that commercial/industrial solid waste incinerator units, which are subject to the requirements of sections 111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air Act, do not exist within the agency's air pollution control jurisdiction.

DATES: Comments must be received in writing by January 9, 2004. ADDRESSES: Send comments to Andrew Steckel, Rulemaking Office Chief (AIR-4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901, or e-mail to *steckel.andrew@epa.gov,* or submit comments at *http://www.regulations.gov.* FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mae Wang, EPA Region IX,

(415)947-4124, *wang.mae@epa.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal addresses a Clean Air Act section 111(d)/129 negative declaration submitted by the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection certifying that commercial/industrial solid waste incinerator units do not exist within its air pollution control jurisdiction. This negative declaration was submitted on October 16, 2003. For further information, please see the information provided in the direct final action, with the same title, that is located in the “Rules and Regulations” section of this **Federal Register** publication. If no adverse comments are received in response to this action, no further activity will be contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. Dated: November 19, 2003. Alexis Strauss, Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. [FR Doc. 03-30591 Filed 12-9-03; 8:45 am]

Connections1 off-index

1 reference not yet in our index

40 CFR 62

Citation graph

cites case law

Proposed Rules

Proposed rule

Cite40 CFR 62

Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources