Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2003-10-03 · Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT · Notices

Notices. Notice of petition for exemption received

435 words·~2 min read·/register/2003/10/03/03-25048

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4910-62-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration [Summary Notice No. PE-2003-57] Petitions for Exemption; Summary of Petitions Received AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of petition for exemption received. SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA's rulemaking provisions governing the application, processing, and disposition of petitions for exemption, part 11 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), this notice contains a summary of a certain petition seeking relief from specified requirements of 14 CFR.
The purpose of this notice is to improve the public's awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of FAA's regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor the inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to affect the legal status of any petition or its final disposition. DATES: Comments on petitions received must identify the petition docket number involved and must be received on or before October 23, 2003. ADDRESSES: Send comments on the petition to the Docket Management System, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Room Plaza 401, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001. You must identify the docket number FAA-2003-15812 at the beginning of your comments. If you wish to receive confirmation that the FAA received your comments, include a self-addressed, stamped postcard. You may also submit comments through the Internet to *http://dms.dot.gov.* You may review the public docket containing the petition, any comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The Dockets Office (telephone 1-800-647-5527) is on the plaza level of the NASSIF Building at the Department of Transportation at the above address. Also, you may review public dockets on the Internet at *http://dms.dot.gov.* FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Caren Centorelli, Office of Rulemaking (ARM-1), Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591. Tel.
(202)267-8199. This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85 and 11.91. Issued in Washington, DC, on September 24, 2003. Donald P. Byrne, Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations. Petitions for Exemption *Docket No.:* FAA-2003-15812. *Petitioner:* Airbus. *Section of 14 CFR Affected:* 14 CFR 25.562(b)(2). *Description of Relief Sought:* Petitioner requests exemption from the floor warpage test requirements of 14 CFR 25.562(b)(2), which requires that “where floor rails or floor fittings are used to attach the seating devices to the test fixture, the rails or fittings must be misaligned with respect to the adjacent set of rails or fittings by at least 10 degrees (i.e, out of parallel) with one rolled 10 degrees.” The petitioner requests this relief for flightdeck seats on Model A380 aircraft. [FR Doc. 03-25048 Filed 10-2-03; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 2
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice of petition for exemption received
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.