Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2002-04-15 · Department of Defense (DoD) · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Proposed rule; withdrawal

169 words·~1 min read·/register/2002/04/15/02-9050

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 48 CFR Part 203 [DFARS Case 99-D028] Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Anticompetitive Teaming AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD). ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal. SUMMARY: DoD is withdrawing the proposed rule published at 66 FR 55157 on November 1, 2001. The rule proposed amendments to the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to add policy addressing exclusive teaming arrangements. The proposed amendments specified that certain exclusive teaming arrangements may evidence violations of the antitrust laws.
Public comments received on this proposed rule and on an earlier proposed rule published at 64 FR 63002 on November 18, 1999, indicated that there is no demonstrated need for DFARS guidance on this subject. Therefore, DoD is withdrawing the proposed rule. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Susan Schneider, Defense Acquisition Regulations Council, OUSD(AT&L)DP(DAR), IMD 3D139, 3062 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3062. Telephone
(703)602-0326; facsimile
(703)602-0350. Please cite DFARS Case 99-D028. Michele P. Peterson, Executive Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations Council. [FR Doc. 02-9050 Filed 4-12-02; 8:45 am]
Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 48 CFR 203
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Proposed rule; withdrawal
Cite48 CFR 203
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.