Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-10-04 · Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce · Notices

Notices. Notice of extension of time limit for the final results of antidumping duty administrative review

422 words·~2 min read·/register/2000/10/04/00-25464

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 3410-15-P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-475-811] Grain-Oriented Electrical Steel From Italy: Notice of Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Antidumping Administrative Review AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice of extension of time limit for the final results of antidumping duty administrative review. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is extending the time limit for the final results of the antidumping duty administrative review of grain-oriented electrical steel
(GOES)from Italy. The period of review is August 1, 1998 through July 31, 1999. EFFECTIVE DATE: October 4, 2000. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maureen McPhillips or Nancy Decker, Office of AD/CVD Enforcement Group III, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone
(202)482-0193 or
(202)482-0196, respectively. The Applicable Statute Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act), as amended, are references to the provisions effective January 1, 1995, the effective date of the amendments made to the Act by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act. In addition, all citations to the Department's regulations are to the regulations at 19 CFR Part 351 (1999). Background On August 31, 1999, AST requested that the Department conduct an administrative review of its exports of grain-oriented electrical steel. The Department initiated this administrative review on October 1, 1999 (64 FR 53318). On September 7, 2000, we published the preliminary results of review in the **Federal Register** (65 FR 54215). Extension of Time Limit for Final Results During this review complex issues have been raised regarding the classification of AST's sales of GOES to the United States. In order to analyze this issue appropriately, the Department sent an additional supplementary questionnaire after the publication of the Preliminary Results. Due to the time constraints placed on the respondent to answer this questionnaire and petitioners to comment on the response, we require an extension. Therefore, because it is not practicable to complete this review within the time limits mandated by section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department is extending the time limit for the final results to be 180 days from the date of the publication of the preliminary results. Therefore, our final results are due no later than March 6, 2001. This extension of the time limit is in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2). Dated: September 27, 2000. Joseph A. Spetrini, Deputy Assistant Secretary, AD/CVD Enforcement Group III. [FR Doc. 00-25464 Filed 10-3-00; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 19 CFR 351
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice of extension of time limit for the final results of antidumping duty administrative review
Cite19 CFR 351
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.