2A:58C-3. Exemptions from liability
338 words·~2 min read·
/nj/title-2a/chapter-58c/2a-58c-3A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
a. In any product liability action against a manufacturer or seller for harm allegedly caused by a product that was designed in a defective manner, the manufacturer or seller shall not be liable if:
(1)At the time the product left the control of the manufacturer, there was not a practical and technically feasible alternative design that would have prevented the harm without substantially impairing the reasonably anticipated or intended function of the product; or
(2)The characteristics of the product are known to the ordinary consumer or user, and the harm was caused by an unsafe aspect of the product that is an inherent characteristic of the product and that would be recognized by the ordinary person who uses or consumes the product with the ordinary knowledge common to the class of persons for whom the product is intended, except that this paragraph shall not apply to industrial machinery or other equipment used in the workplace and it is not intended to apply to dangers posed by products such as machinery or equipment that can feasibly be eliminated without impairing the usefulness of the product; or
(3)The harm was caused by an unavoidably unsafe aspect of the product and the product was accompanied by an adequate warning or instruction as defined in section 4 of this act.
b. The provisions of paragraph
(1)of subsection a. of this section shall not apply if the court, on the basis of clear and convincing evidence, makes all of the following determinations:
(1)The product is egregiously unsafe or ultra-hazardous;
(2)The ordinary user or consumer of the product cannot reasonably be expected to have knowledge of the product's risks, or the product poses a risk of serious injury to persons other than the user or consumer; and
(3)The product has little or no usefulness.
c. No provision of subsection a. of this section is intended to establish any rule, or alter any existing rule, with respect to the burden of proof.
L. 1987, c. 197, s. 3.