§ 4-903

343 words·~2 min read·/md/housing-and-community-development/4-903

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

§4–903.

The General Assembly finds that:

(i)many residents of the State live in dwellings that do not conform to building, health, safety, fire, occupancy, or other codes and standards applicable to housing;

(ii)many communities or political subdivisions in the State do not have a minimum livability code; and

(iii)these conditions impede the development and maintenance of healthy, safe, and viable communities;

(2)private sector financing is often unavailable for rehabilitation because:

(i)owner–occupants of housing in need of rehabilitation often have low incomes; and

(ii)nonoccupant owners often incur high risks in owning and managing the housing;

(3)rehabilitating suitable housing:

(i)increases the economic life of the housing;

(ii)is often more economical and less disruptive than replacing the housing and relocating its occupants;

(iii)can better promote community development when it is done through organized housing rehabilitation programs;

(iv)is essential for sound community development; and

(v)can be helped by rehabilitating commercial buildings serving communities where housing rehabilitation is desirable;

(4)it is a proper public purpose for which public money may be spent and property acquired to:

(i)rehabilitate housing;

(ii)develop healthful, safe, and viable communities;

(iii)rehabilitate commercial buildings to help rehabilitate and develop housing; and

(iv)provide healthful and safe housing for migratory workers to maintain and expand the agricultural activities that are dependent on the labor of these workers; and

(5)it is a proper public purpose for which public money may be spent to:

(i)improve, modify, and add to housing to increase the supply of special housing for special populations, such as elderly households, individuals with disabilities, and other disadvantaged residents of the State;

(ii)prevent lead poisoning by modifying older housing to provide a lead–safe environment, as lead paint in older housing is a major source of lead poisoning in children;

(iii)provide adequate indoor plumbing, water supply, and sewage disposal systems for dwellings; and

(iv)reduce or eliminate radon and asbestos, which are major detriments to the health and safety of residents, on a pilot program basis.