Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Maryland · Health - General

§ 21-260

466 words·~2 min read·/md/health-general/21-260

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

§21–260.
(a)Except as to an alleged violation that is enumerated under subsection (b)(2) of this section, a person may not be convicted of any violation of this part, if, with respect to the alleged violation, the person establishes by a preponderance of evidence that the person did not commit the alleged violation purposely, knowingly, recklessly, or negligently.
(1)A person may not be convicted of any violation of the provisions of this subtitle that are enumerated under paragraph
(2)of this subsection, if, with respect to the alleged violation, the person establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that:
(i)For the purpose of disclosing the possible existence of the violation, the person:
1. Made an inspection, examination, or test; or
2. Received a written report that certified the results of an inspection, examination, or test that was made;
(ii)The inspection, examination, or test and the instruments, personnel, and methods used in connection with it reasonably would be expected to disclose the existence of the violation;
(iii)The inspection, examination, test, or the written report provided no basis for a belief that the alleged violation existed; and
(iv)The person did not commit the alleged violation purposely, knowingly, recklessly, or negligently.
(2)The provisions of paragraph
(1)of this subsection apply to any violation of any of the following provisions of this subtitle:
(i)§ 21-256(1) of this subtitle, concerning the manufacture or sale of an adulterated or misbranded article;
(ii)§ 21-256(2) of this subtitle, concerning the adulteration or misbranding of any article;
(iii)§ 21-256(4) of this subtitle, concerning the receipt in commerce of any adulterated or misbranded article;
(iv)§ 21-256(5) of this subtitle, concerning the delivery of any adulterated or misbranded article;
(v)§ 21-258(b)(13) of this subtitle, concerning the failure to identify on a prescription form the name of the prescriber of a drug;
(vi)§ 21-258(b)(14) of this subtitle, concerning the dispensing of a drug on a written prescription that lacks the name of the prescriber; and
(vii)§ 21-258(b)(15) of this subtitle, concerning the provision to the Secretary of information about prescription drugs.
(c)For purposes of this section, an inspection, examination, or test by representative samples of a lot, delivery, or other mercantile quantity is considered to be a method that reasonably would be expected to disclose the existence of a violation with respect to all of the articles included in the lot, delivery, or other mercantile quantity.
(d)Unless the person also is the manufacturer, packer, distributor, or seller of the article, a publisher, radio or television broadcast license holder, or other agency or medium for the dissemination of an advertisement is not liable under this subtitle for the dissemination by that person of a false advertisement concerning a food, drug, device, or cosmetic.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.