Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Maryland · Health - General

§ 20-1902

355 words·~2 min read·/md/health-general/20-1902

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

§20–1902.
(a)A person or an agent, a representative, or a designee of the State or a local government may not require, coerce, or compel an individual to undergo the subcutaneous implanting of an identification device.
(1)An individual who is implanted with a subcutaneous identification device in violation of subsection
(a)of this section may file a civil action in the circuit court in the county where the violation occurred.
(2)If the court finds that the person or agent, representative, or designee of the State or a local government violated subsection
(a)of this section, the court may:
(i)Assess against the defendant:
1. A civil penalty not exceeding $10,000; and
2. An additional civil penalty not exceeding $1,000 for each day after the day of implantation that the violation continues until corrected; and
(ii)Award the plaintiff:
1. Compensatory damages;
2. Injunctive relief;
3. Reasonable attorney’s fees and litigation expenses, including expert witness fees and expenses; or
4. Any other appropriate relief.
(3)In addition to the damages or relief awarded under paragraph
(2)of this subsection, the court may award the plaintiff punitive damages on a finding of proof of the defendant’s malice, oppression, fraud, or duress inflicted in requiring, coercing, or compelling the plaintiff to undergo the subcutaneous implanting of an identification device.
(1)Except as provided in paragraph
(2)of this subsection, an action brought under subsection
(b)of this section shall be filed within 3 years after the date on which the identification device was implanted.
(2)If a defendant induces the plaintiff to delay the filing of the action or the plaintiff delays the filing due to threats made by the defendant that caused the plaintiff duress, the defendant may not assert the limitation specified under paragraph
(1)of this subsection.
(d)The remedies provided by this section are in addition to any other statutory, legal, or equitable remedies that may be available and are not intended to be prerequisite to or exclusive of any other remedies.
(e)The provisions of this section shall be liberally construed in the protection of privacy and bodily integrity.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.