Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · California · Health and Safety Code

§ 1644.6

536 words·~2 min read·/ca/health-and-safety-code/1644-6

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)No physician and surgeon shall be subject to liability for damages for any cause of action based solely on the use of sperm donated by a sexually intimate partner of the recipient if both of the following conditions are met:
(1)The physician and surgeon provides insemination or assisted reproductive technology services and has obtained the informed consent of the recipient, who waives second or other repeat testing of the sexually intimate partner and acknowledges and accepts the risks of using sperm from a sexually intimate partner who has not undergone repeat testing, in accordance with paragraph
(1)of subdivision
(c)of Section 1644.5.
(2)The physician and surgeon complies with the applicable requirements specified in Section 1644.5.
(b)No physician and surgeon shall be subject to disciplinary action against his or her professional license, or subject to peer review by a professional association peer review body, as defined in clause
(iii)of subparagraph
(B)of paragraph
(1)of subdivision
(a)of Section 805 of the Business and Professions Code, because the physician and surgeon used sperm donated by a sexually intimate partner of the recipient in providing insemination or assisted reproductive technology services if both of the following conditions are met:
(1)The physician and surgeon has obtained the informed consent of the recipient who waives second or other repeat testing of the sexually intimate partner and acknowledges and accepts the risks of using sperm from a sexually intimate partner who has not undergone repeat testing, in accordance with paragraph
(1)of subdivision
(c)of Section 1644.5.
(2)The physician and surgeon complies with the applicable requirements specified in Section 1644.5.
(c)A tissue bank that is owned and operated by a physician and surgeon shall not be subject to disciplinary action against its license because of the use of sperm donated by a sexually intimate partner of the recipient in providing insemination or assisted reproductive technology services if both of the following conditions are met:
(1)A physician and surgeon affiliated with the tissue bank has obtained the informed consent of the recipient, who waives second or other repeat testing of the sexually intimate partner and acknowledges and accepts the risks of using sperm from a sexually intimate partner who has not undergone repeat testing, in accordance with paragraph
(1)of subdivision
(c)of Section 1644.5.
(2)The physician and surgeon complies with the applicable requirements specified in Section 1644.5.
(d)Nothing in this section shall create a duty for a physician and surgeon to use sperm donated by a sexually intimate partner of the recipient in providing insemination or assisted reproductive technology services if the physician and surgeon reasonably concludes that the insemination or services do not meet the 2008 American Society for Reproductive Medicine guidelines for gamete and embryo donation.
(e)Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect any liability that may be imposed pursuant to a federal rule or regulation when a physician and surgeon, or tissue bank provides insemination or assisted reproductive technology services.
(f)For purposes of this section, “sexually intimate partner” includes a known or designated donor to whose sperm the recipient has previously been exposed in a nonmedical setting in an attempt to conceive.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.