Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 119th Congress · S. 2296 (Engrossed in Senate) — To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2026 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military c... · Sec. 1096

Sec. 1096. Retired law enforcement officers continuing service

826 words·~4 min read·/bill/119/s/2296/es/section-1096

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

This section may be cited as the . Retired Law Enforcement Officers Continuing Service Act Title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 ( 34 U.S.C. 10101 et seq. ) is amended by adding at the end the following: In this part: The term civilian law enforcement task — includes— assisting in homicide investigations; assisting in carjacking investigations; assisting in financial crimes investigations; assisting in compliance with reporting requirements; reviewing camera footage; crime scene analysis; forensics analysis; and providing expertise in computers, computer networks, information technology, or the internet; and does not include the ability to make arrests or use force under the color of law.
The term eligible entity means a State, local, Tribal, or territorial law enforcement agency that certifies that retired law enforcement personnel hired using amounts from a grant under this part— have appropriate and reasonably current training and experience to effectively carry out the tasks described in section 3062(a); or will participate in appropriate continuing education programs to satisfy subparagraph (A). The Attorney General may award grants to eligible entities for the purpose of hiring retired personnel from law enforcement agencies to— train civilian employees of the eligible entity on civilian law enforcement tasks that can be performed on behalf of a law enforcement agency; and perform civilian law enforcement tasks on behalf of the eligible entity.
An eligible entity receiving a grant under subsection
(a)shall make a good faith effort to determine whether a retired law enforcement officer seeking to be hired by the eligible entity using amounts from a grant under this part has a disciplinary record or an internal investigation record by— conducting a search of the National Decertification Index; or requesting the personnel record of the retired law enforcement officer from each law enforcement agency that employed the retired law enforcement officer. Before making any hiring determination, the highest ranking law enforcement officer of an eligible entity receiving a grant under subsection
(a)or a designee of that law enforcement officer shall review any findings of misconduct that arise as a result of a search or request conducted pursuant to paragraph (1). A grant awarded under this part shall be subject to the accountability requirements of this section. In this subsection, the term unresolved audit finding means a finding in a final audit report of the Inspector General of the Department of Justice that an audited grantee has used grant funds for an unauthorized expenditure or otherwise unallowable cost that is not closed or resolved within 12 months from the date when the final audit report is issued. Beginning in the first fiscal year beginning after the date of enactment of the Retired Law Enforcement Officers Continuing Service Act , and in each fiscal year thereafter, the Inspector General of the Department of Justice shall conduct audits of recipients of grants under this part to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse of funds by grantees. The Inspector General of the Department of Justice shall determine the appropriate number of grantees to be audited each year. A recipient of grant funds under this part that is found to have an unresolved audit finding shall not be eligible to receive grant funds under this part during the first 2 fiscal years beginning after the end of the 12-month period described in paragraph (1). In awarding grants under this part, the Attorney General shall give priority to eligible entities that did not have an unresolved audit finding during the 3 fiscal years before submitting an application for a grant under this part. Beginning in the fiscal year during which audits commence under subsection (b)(2), the Attorney General shall submit to the Committee on the Judiciary and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives an annual certification— indicating whether— all audits issued by the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Justice under subsection
(b)have been completed and reviewed by the appropriate Assistant Attorney General or Director; and all mandatory exclusions required under subsection (b)(3) have been issued; and that includes a list of any grant recipients excluded under subsection (b)(3) from the previous year. Before the Attorney General awards a grant to an eligible entity under this part, the Attorney General shall compare potential grant awards with other grants awarded by the Attorney General to determine if grant awards are or have been awarded for a similar purpose. If the Attorney General awards grants to the same applicant for a similar purpose, the Attorney General shall submit to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives a report that includes— a list of all such grants awarded, including the total dollar amount of any such grants awarded; and the reason the Attorney General awarded multiple grants to the same applicant for a similar purpose. .
Connectionstraces to 1
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 1096
Retired law enforcement officers continuing service
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.