Sec. 203. Treatment of secondary transactions in digital commodities that originally involved investment contracts

201 words·~1 min read·/bill/119/hr/3633/ih/section-203

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the offer or sale of a digital commodity that originally involved an investment contract by a person other than the issuer of such digital commodity, or an agent or underwriter thereof, shall be deemed not to be an offer or sale of the investment contract originally involving the digital commodity between the issuer of the investment contract involving the digital commodity, or an agent or underwriter thereof, and the purchaser of such digital commodity under— the Securities Act of 1933 ( 15 U.S.C. 77a et seq. ); the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 ( 15 U.S.C. 80b–1 et seq. ); the Investment Company Act of 1940 ( 15 U.S.C. 80a–1 et seq. ); the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( 15 U.S.C. 78a et seq. ); the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 ( 15 U.S.C. 78aaa et seq. ); and any applicable provisions of State law.

An end user distribution does not involve the offer or sale of a security. In this section and with respect to a digital commodity issuer, the term agent means any person directly or indirectly controlled by the issuer or under direct or indirect common control with the issuer.

Connectionstraces to 3

Traces to 3 documents

U.S. Code

2 references not yet in our index

15 USC 80b–1
15 USC 80a–1

Citation graph

cites case law

Sec. 203

Treatment of secondary transactions in digital commodities that originally involved investment contracts

U.S.C.§ 77a

U.S.C.§ 78a

U.S.C.§ 78aaa

Cite15 USC 80b–1

Cite15 USC 80a–1

Cites 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources