Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 118th Congress · S. 4367 (Reported in Senate) — To provide for improvements to the rivers and harbors of the United States, to provide for the conservation and devel... · Sec. 230

Sec. 230. Review of authorities and programs for alternative project delivery

276 words·~1 min read·/bill/118/s/4367/rs/section-230

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act and subject to subsections
(b)and (c), the Secretary shall carry out a study of the authorities and programs of the Corps of Engineers that facilitate the use of alternative project delivery methods for water resources development projects, including public-private partnerships. In carrying out the study under subsection (a), the authorities and programs that are studied shall include any programs and authorities under— section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 ( 33 U.S.C. 2232 ); section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 ( 42 U.S.C. 1962d–5b ); and section 5014 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 ( 33 U.S.C. 2201 note; Public Law 113–121 ). The Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report that— describes the findings of the study under subsection (a); and includes— an assessment of how each authority and program included in the study under subsection
(a)has been used by the Secretary; a list of the water resources development projects that have been carried out pursuant to the authorities and programs included in the study under subsection (a); a discussion of the implementation challenges, if any, associated with the authorities and programs included in the study under subsection (a); a description of lessons learned and best practices identified by the Secretary from carrying out the authorities and programs included in the study under subsection (a); and any recommendations, including legislative recommendations, that result from the study under subsection (a).
Connectionstraces to 3
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 42 USC 1962d–5b
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 230
Review of authorities and programs for alternative project delivery
Cite42 USC 1962d–5b
Cites 4Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.