Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 117th Congress · H.R. 9244 (Introduced in House) — To amend the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 to increase the funds allocated to carry out the market access program an... · Sec. 2

Sec. 2. Findings

319 words·~1 min read·/bill/117/hr/9244/ih/section-2

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Congress finds the following: Between 1977 and 2019, the export promotion programs of the Department of Agriculture (in this section referred to as the Programs ) have added, on average, $9,600,000,000 per year to the value of United States agricultural exports, equal to a total of nearly $648,000,000,000, or 13.7 percent, in additional export revenue. Between 1977 and 2019, the Programs have generated a net return of $24.50 for every dollar invested. Between 2002 and 2019, the Programs have contributed up to 225,800 full- and part-time jobs across the United States economy.
Between 2002 and 2019, the Programs have added up to $45,000,000,000 in gross economic output and $22,300,000,000 in gross domestic product. Communities across the United States that produce agricultural commodities as varied as apples, blueberries, strawberries, cotton, beef, soybeans, rice, wheat, dairy, corn, citrus, wine, pork, peanuts, cranberries, lentils, tree nuts, timber, poultry, potatoes, and seafood, have utilized the Programs to increase the foreign market access of such communities.
Private sector contributions have helped maintain the public-private partnership between the Department of Agriculture and private agricultural groups as the effective available funds from the Department have declined, with private contributions representing approximately 70 to 77 percent of the funds available for export promotion from 2013 to 2019. Agricultural export promotion programs of foreign competitors have expanded at a far faster rate than the Programs, placing United States producers at a competitive disadvantage in international markets.
The economic impact of the Programs has eroded in recent years, as funding for the Market Access Program has remained static since 2006, and funding for the Foreign Market Development Program has remained static since 2002, while inflation has increased. A recent academic analysis found that doubling public funding for the Market Access Program and the Foreign Market Development Program, coupled with increasing private contributions by 10 to 20 percent, would result in average annual gains in agricultural exports of approximately $7,400,000,000.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.