Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 117th Congress · H.R. 8367 (Reported in House) — To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2023 for intelligence and intelligence-related activities of the United S... · Sec. 311

Sec. 311. Personnel vetting performance measures

325 words·~1 min read·/bill/117/hr/8367/rh/section-311

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of National Intelligence, acting as the Security Executive Agent, and in coordination with the Chair and other principals of the Council, shall develop performance measures to assess the vetting of personnel, including measures to assess continuous vetting and the quality of each phase of the security clearance process, including the initiation, investigation, and adjudication phases. Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of National Intelligence shall submit to the congressional intelligence committees a report describing the performance measures developed under subsection (a).
The report under paragraph
(1)shall include the following: A description of how departments and agencies of the United States Government have implemented Security Executive Agent Directive 6 titled Continuous Evaluation and related personnel vetting performance measures to ensure that implementation is efficient and effective, including the resources expended by each department or agency for continuous vetting and whether departments and agencies are identifying security-relevant information in a timely manner. A description of the performance measures the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of Defense use to assess the quality of each phase of the security clearance process, including initiation, investigation, adjudication, reinvestigation, and continuous vetting. How such performance measures meet key attributes for successful performance measures as described in the report of the Comptroller General of the United States titled Personnel Vetting: Actions Needed to Implement Reforms, Address Challenges, and Improve Planning (GAO–22–104093). Any impediments or constraints relating to the implementation of Security Executive Agent Directive 6 or the development of such performance measures to assess the quality of the clearance process. The terms continuous vetting , Council , and Security Executive Agent have the meanings given those terms in section 6601 of the Damon Paul Nelson and Matthew Young Pollard Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 2018, 2019, and 2020 ( 50 U.S.C. 3352 ).
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 311
Personnel vetting performance measures
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.