Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 117th Congress · H.R. 7776 (Engrossed in House) — To provide for improvements to the rivers and harbors of the United States, to provide for the conservation and devel... · Sec. 105

Sec. 105. Removal of manmade obstruction to aquatic ecosystem restoration projects

180 words·~1 min read·/bill/117/hr/7776/eh/section-105

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

In carrying out an aquatic ecosystem restoration project, at the request of a non-Federal interest and with the consent of the owner of a manmade obstruction, the Secretary shall determine whether the removal of such obstruction from the aquatic environment within the geographic scope of the project is necessary to meet the aquatic ecosystem restoration goals of the project. If the Secretary determines under subsection
(a)that removal of an obstruction is necessary, the Secretary shall consider the removal of such obstruction to be a project feature and the cost of such removal shall be shared between the Secretary and non-Federal interest as a construction cost. The requirements of subsection
(a)shall apply to any project for ecosystem restoration authorized on or after June 10, 2014. The authority contained in this section shall not apply to the Ice Harbor Lock and Dam, the Little Goose Lock and Dam, the Lower Granite Lock and Dam, and the Lower Monumental Lock and Dam on Snake River, authorized by section 2 of the Act of March 2, 1945 (chapter 19, 59 Stat. 21).
Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 59 Stat. 21
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 105
Removal of manmade obstruction to aquatic ecosystem restoration projects
Stat.59 Stat. 21
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.