Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 117th Congress · H.R. 4521 (Placed on Calendar Senate) — To provide for a coordinated Federal research initiative to ensure continued United States leadership in engineering... · Sec. 106002

Sec. 106002. Limitation on duty suspensions or reductions for finished goods

475 words·~2 min read·/bill/117/hr/4521/pcs/section-106002

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Section 3(b) of the American Manufacturing Competitiveness Act of 2016 ( 19 U.S.C. 1332 note) is amended as follows: In paragraph (2)— by redesignating subparagraph
(K)as subparagraph (L); and by inserting after subparagraph
(J)the following: A certification that the article is not a finished good, defined as a good that— is ready for sale to the ultimate purchaser, end user, or consumer, whether or not packed or repacked after entry into the customs territory of the United States (as such term is defined in General Note 2 to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States) for retail sale; will not undergo any substantial processing or transformation, as such terms are interpreted by U.S. Customs and Border Protection, after entry into the customs territory of the United States; is an unassembled, disassembled, or otherwise incomplete good, having the essential character of the complete and assembled finished good; or is solely intended to be— repacked to make the good suitable for retail sale or distribution; retagged or relabeled; combined with instructional or warranty materials or with other items or accessories for post-entry sale; or subjected to other minor operations not substantially transforming the good as entered into the customs territory of the United States. . By amending paragraph (3)(C)(ii)(IV) to read as follows: A list of petitions for duty suspensions and reductions for which the Commission recommends modifications to the scope of the articles that are the subject of such petitions, with the modifications specified— to address objections by domestic producers to such petitions; or to ensure that the articles are not finished goods as defined under paragraph (2)(K). . By amending paragraph (3)(C)(ii)(VI) to read as follows: A list of petitions for duty suspensions and reductions that the Commission does not recommend for inclusion in a miscellaneous tariff bill, other than petitions specified in subclause (V), including petitions for which, in the view of the Commission, the articles that are the subject of the petitions are finished goods, as defined under paragraph (2)(K). . Section 3(c) of the American Manufacturing Competitiveness Act of 2016 ( 19 U.S.C. 1332 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: An identification of any article that is subject to an order issued pursuant to title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1671 et seq. ) whose article description may overlap with the article description of the subject of the petition. . The United States International Trade Commission may issue such guidance, including in the form of a list of goods presumed to be finished goods and their accompanying headings under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, as the Commission determines useful or necessary to provide information to petitioners with respect to the limits imposed on duty suspensions and reductions by reason of the amendments under subsection (a).
Connectionstraces to 2
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 106002
Limitation on duty suspensions or reductions for finished goods
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.