Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 117th Congress · H.R. 4190 (Introduced in House) — To impose anti-fraud requirements with respect to certain unemployment benefits authorized under the CARES Act, and f... · Sec. 102

Sec. 102. Recovery of overpayments attributable to fraud

422 words·~2 min read·/bill/117/hr/4190/ih/section-102

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Section 2102(f)(3) of the CARES Act ( 15 U.S.C. 9021(f)(3) ) is amended by adding at the end the following: In any case in which a State agency makes an overpayment of assistance to any individual under an agreement under this section, the State shall make restitution to the Secretary for the amount of such overpayment. . The amendments made by paragraph
(1)shall take effect as if included in the enactment of the CARES Act ( Public Law 116–136 ). Section 3304(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— in paragraph (4), by striking and at the end of subparagraph (F), by inserting and at the end of subparagraph (G), and by adding at the end the following: amounts may be withdrawn for the payment of fees in accordance with paragraph (19); ; and by striking and at the end of paragraph (18), by redesignating paragraph
(19)as paragraph (20), and by inserting after paragraph
(18)the following: in the case of any State that fails to recover at least 75 percent of amounts of pandemic unemployment assistance paid to individuals who fraudulently obtained such assistance under section 2102 of the CARES Act prior to December 31, 2022, the payment of a processing fee to the Secretary of the Treasury, for each withdrawal made from the unemployment fund of the State, in a total amount equal to the amounts of such assistance unrecovered as of such date, to be amortized, as determined by the Secretary of Labor, over a 5-year period beginning on January 1, 2023, except that in no case may the method governing the computation of regular compensation (as defined in section 205(2) of the Federal-State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 1970) under the State law be modified in a manner such that the number of weeks, or the average weekly benefit amount, of regular compensation (as so defined) which will be payable after any such withdrawal be less than the number of weeks, or the average weekly benefit amount, of the average weekly benefit amount of regular compensation (as so defined) which would otherwise have been payable at such time under the State law, as in effect on January 1, 2020; and . Section 303(a)(5) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 503(a)(5) ) is amended by striking ; and at the end and inserting : . Provided further ; That amounts may be withdrawn for the payment of fees in accordance with paragraph
(19)of section 3304(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
Connectionstraces to 3
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 102
Recovery of overpayments attributable to fraud
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.