Sec. 103. Report on blue carbon in the United States
366 words·~2 min read·
/bill/116/s/5056/is/section-103A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act and every 2 years thereafter, the Administrator, in consultation with the interagency working group, shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives a report containing the following: A summary of federally funded coastal and marine blue carbon ecosystem research, monitoring, preservation, and restoration activities, including the budget for each of those activities and a description of the progress made in advancing the national priorities established by the interagency working group.
With respect to each blue carbon ecosystem, the— type; location; and type of ownership, delineated by private lands, State lands, Tribal lands, or Federal. An assessment of the vulnerability of coastal and marine blue carbon ecosystems to climate impacts such as sea-level rise, acidification, and saltwater intrusion, and other environmental and human stressors, such as development, water pollution, and aquaculture. An assessment of the greatest anthropogenic threats to blue carbon ecosystems, including the Federal agency actions that have historically caused and presently cause great adverse effects on such ecosystems.
An assessment of the carbon sequestration potential of blue carbon ecosystems and the probable changes to sequestration under climate change scenarios. An assessment of biophysical, social, and economic impediments, including water storage and flood control structures, to coastal blue carbon ecosystem protection and restoration and opportunities to restore and enhance the resilience and sequestration potential of blue carbon ecosystems. An assessment of aging or outdated artificial structures, including dikes, levees, dams, culverts, water storage structures, shoreline hardening projects, impediments to fish passage, and other infrastructure that impede the ecological or sequestration functions of blue carbon ecosystems and the feasibility of repairing, retrofitting, or removing such structures.
An assessment of the economic, social, and environmental co-benefits that those blue carbon ecosystems provide including— coastal protection from storms and flooding; tourism and recreational use; benefits to fisheries; nutrient removal; number of jobs that are directly or indirectly attributable to blue carbon ecosystems; and total economic activity that is attributable to blue carbon ecosystems. An assessment of the social and economic makeup of the communities served by blue carbon ecosystems.