Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 116th Congress · S. 4049 (Reported in Senate) — To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2021 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military c... · Sec. 232

Sec. 232. Independent comparative analysis of efforts by China and the United States to recruit and retain researchers in national security-related fields

453 words·~2 min read·/bill/116/s/4049/rs/section-232

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

The Secretary of Defense shall seek to enter into an agreement with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine for the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to perform the services covered by this section. The Secretary shall seek to enter into the agreement described in paragraph
(1)not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. Under an agreement between the Secretary and the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine under this section, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine shall carry out a comparative analysis of efforts by China and the United States Government to recruit and retain domestic and foreign researchers and develop recommendations for the Department of Defense. The comparative analysis carried out under paragraph
(1)and the recommendations developed under such paragraph shall include the following: A list of the talent programs used by China and a list of the incentive programs used by the United States to recruit and retain relevant researchers. The types of researchers, scientists, other technical experts, and fields targeted by each talent program listed under subparagraph (A). The number of researchers in academia, the Department of Defense Science and Technology Reinvention Laboratories, and national security science and engineering programs of the National Nuclear Security Administration targeted by the talent programs listed under subparagraph (A). The number of personnel currently participating in the talent programs listed under subparagraph
(A)and the number of researchers currently participating in the incentive programs listed under such subparagraph. The incentives offered by each of the talent programs listed under subparagraph
(A)and a description of the incentives offered through incentive programs under such subparagraph to recruit and retain researchers, scientists, and other technical experts. A characterization of the national security, economic, and scientific benefits China gains through the talent programs listed under subparagraph
(A)and a description of similar gains accrued to the United States through incentive programs listed under such subparagraph. A list of findings and recommendations relating to policies that can be implemented by the United States, especially the Department of Defense, to improve the relative effectiveness of United States activities to recruit and retain researchers, scientists, and other technical experts relative to China. Not later than one year after the date of the execution of an agreement under subsection (a), the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the findings National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine with respect to the review carried out under this section and the recommendations developed under this section. The report submitted under paragraph
(1)shall be submitted in a publicly releasable and unclassified formats, but may include a classified annex.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.