Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 115th Congress · H.R. 4425 (Introduced in House) — To reform the safety net for farmers and ranchers, enhance soil, water, and habitat conservation, encourage beginning... · Sec. 241

Sec. 241. Repeal and reestablishment of EQIP conservation innovation grant program

405 words·~2 min read·/bill/115/hr/4425/ih/section-241

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Section 1240H of the Food Security Act of 1985 ( 16 U.S.C. 3839aa–8 ) is repealed. The amendment made by this subsection shall not affect the validity or terms of any contract entered into by the Secretary of Agriculture under section 1240H of the Food Security Act of 1985 ( 16 U.S.C. 3839aa–8 ) before October 1, 2018, or any payments required to be made in connection with the contract. The Secretary may use funds made available to carry out conservation innovation grants and payments under section 1240S of title XII of the Food Security Act of 1985, as added by subsection
(b)of this section, to continue to carry out contracts referred to in subparagraph
(A)using the provisions of law and regulation applicable to such contracts as they existed on September 30, 2018. Chapter 5 of subtitle D of title XII of the Food Security Act of 1985 ( 16 U.S.C. 3839bb et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section: The Secretary shall, for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023, carry out a conservation innovation grant program to encourage innovation in conservation on private farmland, rangeland, wetlands, grasslands, and forest lands. The Secretary shall provide grants under this section to governmental and nongovernmental organizations and persons, on a competitive basis, to carry out projects that— develop and test innovative and cost-effective technologies and practices and methods of conservation delivery to address priority resource concerns; involve producers who are eligible for payments or technical assistance under this title; leverage Federal funds made available to carry out this section with matching funds provided by State and local governments and private organizations to promote environmental enhancement and protection in conjunction with agricultural production; ensure efficient and effective transfer of innovative technologies and approaches demonstrated through projects that receive funding under this subsection, such as market systems for pollution reduction and practices for the storage of carbon in soil; provide environmental and resource conservation benefits through increased participation by producers of specialty crops; provide payments to producers to implement cost-effective and innovative technologies to address priority resource concerns related to air quality from agricultural operations; or provide environmental and resource conservation benefits through increased participation by beginning farmers and ranchers and socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers. The Secretary shall develop criteria for evaluating applications for competitive grants under this section that will ensure that priority resource concerns are effectively addressed. .
Connectionstraces to 1
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 16 USC 3839aa–8
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 241
Repeal and reestablishment of EQIP conservation innovation grant program
Cite16 USC 3839aa–8
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.