Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 115th Congress · H.R. 2936 (Engrossed in House) — To expedite under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and improve forest management activities on National... · Sec. 311

Sec. 311. Use of arbitration instead of litigation to address challenges to forest management activities

693 words·~3 min read·/bill/115/hr/2936/eh/section-311

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

The Secretary of Agriculture, with respect to National Forest System lands, and the Secretary of the Interior, with respect to public lands, shall each establish a discretionary arbitration pilot program as an alternative dispute resolution process in lieu of judicial review for the activities described in paragraph (2). The Secretary concerned, at the sole discretion of the Secretary, may designate objections or protests to forest management activities for arbitration under the arbitration pilot program established under paragraph (1).
Under the arbitration pilot program, the Secretary concerned may not arbitrate more than 10 objections or protests to forest management activities in a fiscal year in— each Forest Service Region; and each State Region of the Bureau of Land Management. An objection or protest to a forest management activity shall not be counted towards the limitation on number of arbitrations under paragraph
(3)unless— on the date such objection or protest is designated for arbitration, the forest management activity for which such objection or protest is filed has not been the subject of arbitration proceedings under the pilot program; and the arbitration proceeding has commenced with respect to such objection or protest. The pilot programs established pursuant to paragraph
(1)shall terminate on the date that is 7 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. Any person that submitted a public comment on the forest management activity that is subject to arbitration may intervene in the arbitration— by endorsing— the forest management activity; or the modification proposal submitted under subparagraph (B); or by submitting a proposal to further modify the forest management activity. With respect to an objection or protest that is designated for arbitration under this subsection (a), a request to intervene in an arbitration must be submitted not later than the date that is 30 days after the date on which such objection or protest was designated for arbitration. Multiple intervening parties may submit a joint proposal so long as each intervening party meets the eligibility requirements of paragraph (1). The Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the Interior shall jointly develop and publish a list of not fewer than 20 individuals eligible to serve as arbitrators for the pilot programs under this section. In order to be eligible to serve as an arbitrator under this subsection, an individual shall be, on the date of the appointment of such arbitrator— certified by the American Arbitration Association; and not a registered lobbyist. For each arbitration commenced under this section, the Secretary concerned and each applicable objector or protestor shall agree, not later than 14 days after the agreement process is initiated, on a mutually acceptable arbitrator from the list published under subsection. In the case of an agreement with respect to a mutually acceptable arbitrator not being reached within the 14-day limit described in subparagraph (A), the Secretary concerned shall appoint an arbitrator from the list published under this subsection. The arbitrator appointed under subsection (c)— may not modify any of the proposals submitted with the objection, protest, or request to intervene; and shall select to be conducted— the forest management activity, as approved by the Secretary; or a proposal submitted by an objector or an intervening party. An arbitrator shall, when selecting a proposal, consider— whether the proposal is consistent with the applicable forest plan, laws, and regulations; whether the proposal can be carried out by the Secretary concerned; and the effect of each proposal on— forest health; habitat diversity; wildfire potential; insect and disease potential; timber production; and the implications of a resulting decline in forest health, loss of habitat diversity, wildfire, or insect or disease infestation, given fire and insect and disease historic cycles, on— domestic water costs; wildlife habitat loss; and other economic and social factors. The decision of an arbitrator with respect to the forest management activity— shall not be considered a major Federal action; shall be binding; and shall not be subject to judicial review, except as provided in section 10(a) of title 9, United States Code. Not later than 90 days after the date on which the arbitration is filed with respect to the forest management activity, the arbitration process shall be completed.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.