Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 114th Congress · S. 2757 (Introduced in Senate) — To prohibit certain transactions with Iran and to impose sanctions with respect to foreign financial institutions tha... · Sec. 2

Sec. 2. Prohibition on certain transactions with Iran and blocking of property with respect to foreign financial institutions that facilitate certain transactions with Iran

810 words·~4 min read·/bill/114/s/2757/is/section-2

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Congress finds the following: A nuclear capable Iran poses a direct threat to the United States and its allies around the world. Nothing in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action obligates the United States to lift financial sanctions with respect to Iran, and in fact, unilateral sanctions have proven effective in achieving foreign policy aims of the United States. Iran has violated United Nations Security Council Resolutions 1929
(2010)and 2231 (2015), which form the basis of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. The goal of imposing economic sanctions with respect to Iran was to penalize Iran for its pursuit of nuclear weapons for illicit purposes. In spite of the fact that Iran has violated the resolutions specified in paragraph
(3)and destroyed the intent of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, President Barack Obama has voluntarily paid the Government of Iran $1,700,000,000 in a settlement of a claim before the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal. After giving the Government of Iran further access to global assets, President Obama has now indicated that he is prepared to give Iran access to United States dollars. Continuing his governance by executive fiat, President Obama is giving Iran access to United States dollars in a manner that evades review by Congress. President Obama continues to let Iran dictate the interpretation of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action to the people of the United States. Secretary of the Treasury Jack Lew said to the Senate last year that, Iranian banks will not be able to clear U.S. dollars through New York and that Iranian banks will not hold correspondent account relationships with U.S. financial institutions, or enter into financing arrangements with U.S. banks . Granting access to the United States dollar will strengthen the access of Iran to the global financial system, increase the ability of Iran to conduct illicit transactions in weapons trade, and decrease the minor amount of leverage retained by the United States Government to contain the nuclear ambitions of Iran. The Government of Iran continues to funnel large amounts of money and arms to terrorist organizations that target citizens of the United States and even limited access to United States dollars will strengthen the ability of Iran to support those organizations. It is the sense of Congress that— because Secretary of State John Kerry and President Obama have made inconsistent, conflicting statements about allowing the Government of Iran to access the United States dollar, Congress must act to preempt any move to grant licenses resulting in access to the United States dollar; and Congress must act in the interest of the people of the United States to correct the unconstitutional actions taken by President Obama with respect to Iran. The President may not issue any license under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act ( 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq. ) to an offshore dollar clearing entity to conduct a transaction with an Iranian financial institution in United States dollars. Notwithstanding section 560.516 of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act), a United States person may not process any transfer of funds to or from Iran, or for the direct or indirect benefit of persons in Iran or the Government of Iran, even if the transfer arises from, and is ordinarily incident and necessary to give effect to, an underlying transaction. The President shall, in accordance with the International Emergency Economic Powers Act ( 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq. ), block and prohibit all transactions in all property and interests in property of any foreign financial institution that serves as an offshore dollar clearing entity to conduct a transaction with an Iranian financial institution in United States dollars if such property and interests in property are in the United States, come within the United States, or are or come within the possession or control of a United States person. Not later than 30 days before the President implements any measure that would provide access to the United States dollar to the Government of Iran or an Iranian person, the President shall submit to Congress a report that describes the measure. This section shall terminate only on the date on which the President certifies to Congress that Iran is no longer a state sponsor of terrorism (as defined in section 301 of the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2010 ( 22 U.S.C. 8541 )). In this section: The term foreign financial institution has the meaning of that term as determined by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to section 104(i) of the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2010 ( 22 U.S.C. 8513(i) ). The term Iranian financial institution has the meaning given that term in section 104A(d) of the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2010 ( 22 U.S.C. 8513b(d) ).
Connectionstraces to 4
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.