Sec. 2. Trade negotiating objectives regarding human health
166 words·~1 min read·
/bill/114/hr/5436/ih/section-2A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
Section 102(b)(4) of the Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015 ( Public Law 114–26 ; 19 U.S.C. 4201(b)(4) ) is amended— by redesignating subparagraphs
(G)and
(H)as subparagraphs
(H)and (I), respectively; and by inserting after subparagraph
(F)the following: recognizing the right of the United States to elect to deny the benefits of any dispute settlement claim that is made under the provisions of any trade agreement to which the United States is a party and that challenges any law or other measure relating to human health that is adopted, maintained, or enforced by the United States; and providing in each such trade agreement that, if the United States elects to deny a claim relating to a law or other measure that the United States considers appropriate to ensure that investment activity in its territory is undertaken in a manner sensitive to the human health objectives of the United States, then that claim shall be dismissible in any arbitration proceeding; .
Connectionstraces to 2
Traces to 2 documents
public-private-law
U.S. Code
Citation graph
cites case law
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources