Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 114th Congress · H.R. 1806 (Reported in House) — To provide for technological innovation through the prioritization of Federal investment in basic research, fundament... · Sec. 106

Sec. 106. Greater accountability in Federal funding for research

276 words·~1 min read·/bill/114/hr/1806/rh/section-106

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

The Foundation shall award Federal funding for basic research and education in the sciences through a new research grant or cooperative agreement only if an affirmative determination is made by the Foundation under subsection
(b)and written justification relating thereto is published under subsection (c). A determination referred to in subsection
(a)is a justification by the responsible Foundation official as to how the research grant or cooperative agreement promotes the progress of science in the United States, consistent with the Foundation mission as established in the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 ( 42 U.S.C. 1861 et seq. ), and further— is worthy of Federal funding; and is in the national interest, as indicated by having the potential to achieve— increased economic competitiveness in the United States; advancement of the health and welfare of the American public; development of an American STEM workforce that is globally competitive; increased public scientific literacy and public engagement with science and technology in the United States; increased partnerships between academia and industry in the United States; support for the national defense of the United States; or promotion of the progress of science in the United States. Public announcement of each award of Federal funding described in subsection
(a)shall include a written justification from the responsible Foundation official as to how a grant or cooperative agreement meets the requirements of subsection (b). A determination under subsection
(b)shall be made after a research grant or cooperative agreement proposal has satisfied the Foundation’s reviews for Merit and Broader Impacts. Nothing in this section shall be construed as altering the Foundation’s intellectual merit or broader impacts criteria for evaluating grant applications.
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 106
Greater accountability in Federal funding for research
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.