Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Alaska · Title 12 · Chapter 73

Sec. 12.73.020. Findings required for post-conviction DNA testing orders.

357 words·~2 min read·/ak/title-12/chapter-73/12-73-020

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Sec. 12.73.020. Findings required for post-conviction DNA testing orders.
The court shall order post-conviction DNA testing of specific evidence if
(1)the applicant was convicted of a felony under AS 11.41 ;
(2)the applicant and, if represented, the applicant's attorney, have submitted the affidavits required by AS 12.73.010 (b);
(3)the applicant did not admit or concede guilt under oath in an official proceeding for the offense that was the basis of the conviction or a lesser included offense, except that the court, in the interest of justice, may waive this requirement; for the purposes of this paragraph, the entry of a guilty or nolo contendere plea is not an admission or concession of guilt;
(4)the evidence either
(A)was not subjected to DNA testing; or
(B)was previously subjected to DNA testing, and
(i)the applicant is requesting DNA testing using a method or technology that is substantially more probative than the previous DNA testing; or
(ii)the court determines that granting the application is in the best interest of justice;
(5)the evidence to be tested has been subject to a chain of custody and retained under conditions that ensure that the evidence has not been substituted, contaminated, or altered in any manner material to the proposed DNA testing;
(6)the proposed DNA testing is reasonable in scope, uses scientifically sound methods, and is consistent with accepted forensic practices;
(7)the applicant identifies a theory of defense that would establish the applicant's innocence;
(8)the applicant was convicted after a trial and the identity of the perpetrator was a disputed issue in the trial;
(9)the proposed DNA testing of the specific evidence may produce new material evidence that would
(A)support the theory of defense described in
(7)of this section; and
(B)raise a reasonable probability that the applicant did not commit the offense;
(10)the applicant consents to provide a DNA sample for purposes of comparison and to entry of the results into the DNA identification registration system under AS 44.41.035 and into any other law enforcement database; and
(11)the application is timely as described in AS 12.73.040 .
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.